Advanced Search Results
T.T.K.-lig Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Dec-16-2005
Service Tax
(2006)(193)ELT169TriDel
importation, to the extent equal to the duty of excise levied as cess under Section 12 of the Rubber Act, 1947 on rubber produced/manufactured in India as on the said date? 2. It appears that the appellants had challenged … Supreme Court and later not pressed as evident from the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court made on 17-2-2003 : Learned Counsel for the appellants states that she has instructions not to press these appeals. It is
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Aski.T.C. Limited Vs. the Agricultural Produce Market Committee and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Jan-24-2002
ConstitutionOther Taxes
Tobacco Board Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 3(1), 8, 13, 13A, 14A, 20 and 20A; Bihar Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1960 - Sections 3, 4(2), 8, 8(2), 15, 27 and 32; Constitution of India - Articles 32, 226, 227, 246, 246(1), 246(2), 246(3), 246(4), 249, 250, 251, 252, 253, 254, 254(1), 254(2), 352 to 354 and 369; Industries, Development and Regulation Act, 1951 - Sections 18G; Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1966; Oriental Gas Company Act, 1960; Mysore Silkworm Seed and Cocoon (Regulation of Production, Supply and Distribution) Act, 1959; Central Provinces and Berar Sales of Motor Spirit & Lubricants Taxation Act, 1938;Central Silk Boards Act, 1948 - Sections 2; Maharashtra Debt Relief Act, 1976; Gold (Control) Act, 1968; Bihar Markets Act, 1960 - Sections 6 to 15
AIR2002SC852; 2002(1)ARBLR112(SC); [2002(2)JCR177(SC)]; JT2002(1)SC294; 2002(1)SCALE327; (2002)9SCC232; [2002]1SCR441; (2002)1UPLBEC814
List I, namely, the Cardomon Act, 1965; The Central Silk Board Act, 1958; The Coffee Act, 1942; The Rubber Act, 1947; The Tea Act, 1953; The Coir Industry Act, 1953; The Coconut Development Board Act, 1979 and The Tobacco … been bought or sold within the market area and the power to levy and collect market fee under Section 27 of the Bihar Agricultural Produce Markets Act, being on the Agricultural produce bought or sold in the … hold, that the Adhiniyam permitting levy and collection of fee under Section 17(iii), in so far as it applies to tobacco, is not repugnant to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Malankara Rubber and Produce Co. and ors., Etc., Etc. Vs. the Stat ...
Supreme Court of India
Apr-28-1972
Property
Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 -- Sections 81 and 96; Kerala Land Reforms (Amendment) Act, 1969 - Sections 80, 80-A and 81(1); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 31-A, 31-A(2) and 31-B; Kerala Land Reforms (Amendment) Act, 1964; Kerala Plantations (Additional Tax) Act, 1960 - Sections 2(6)
AIR1972SC2027; 1972(0)KLT411(SC); (1972)2SCC492; [1973]1SCR399
of measures passed by the Central Legislature to control various industries, namely, the Tea Act of 1953, the Rubber Act, 1947, The Cardamom Act, 1955, the Coffee Act of 1942 and the coir Act of 1963. The measures in … to be in terms of item 52 of List I of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution. under Section 17 of this Act no one can plant or replant rubber except under and in accordance with the conditions
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Superintending Engineer and ors. Vs. Workmen of Machkund Hydro Electri ...
Orissa
Nov-12-1959
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10, 10(1), 15 and 25G; Constitution of India - Article 226
AIR1960Ori205
Disputes Act, 1947 relating to the disputes which arose between Lipton Ltd. and their workers Union and under Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act the award of Tribunal was binding on all persons employed in the Delhi … considered in a recent Madras case in Management of India Tyre and Rubber Co. (India) Private Ltd. v. Workers of the India Tyre and Rubber … in all these cases as aforesaid was not the 'appropriate Government' within the meaning of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Act XIV of 1947) and accordingly the said reference having been invalid, it was contended that the awards
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Ruby Rubber Works Ltd.,
Kerala
Apr-06-1989
Direct Taxation
[1989]178ITR181(Ker)
subsidy scheme framed by the Rubber Board and the provisions of the Rubber Act.14. Section 8 of the Rubber Act, 1947, provides that it shall be the duty of the Board to promote by such measures as it thinks … Tribunal, Cochin Bench :'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, Rs. 16,740 and Rs. 17,105 being the subsidy received from the Rubber Board is taxable income for the assessment years 1971-72 and 1974-75,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.Ct.M. Corporation Pvt. Ltd., Madras and ors. Vs. the Director of Enf ...
Chennai
Mar-09-1988
FERA
Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 54; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 - Sections 4, 5, 9, 10, 10(1), 10(2), 12(2), 17, 18-A, 18-B, 23 and 23(1); Foreign Exchange Regulation (Amendment) Act, 1964
AIR1989Mad141
62186-43 receivable by the fifth appellant on account of sale of Nataraja Rubber Estate in 1959 was delayed; (ii) that the fifth appellant in contravention … appellants who were initially charged for having contravened the provisions of Section 10(1)(b) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) were later on proceeded against departmentally for- contravention of the provisions of … person contravenes the provisions of Section 4, Section 5, Section 9, Section 10, Sub-section (2) of Section 12, Section 17, Section 18-A or Section 18-B or of any rule, direction, or order made thereunder, he shall--(a) be liable
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN.P.K.R.R. Cooperative Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. the Commercial Tax Officer ...
Chennai
Aug-11-2010
Constitution
Constitution Of India - Article 226
said decision has to be understood in the light of the specific provision contained in Section 12 of Rubber Act 1947 and Section 5 read along with Entry 71 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act. Section 12 of … cent on the purchase of sugarcane by the Sugar Mills was notified in G.O.P.No.88 CT & RE dated 17.3.1993-Notn.No.II(1)/ CTRE/41(b)/93 Gazettee dated 17.3.1993 Effective from 1.10.1992) Relevant para of Clauses 3 and 5 A of the Sugarcane
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGouri Shankar Chatterjee and ors. Vs. Texmaco Limited and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Dec-15-2000
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 17-B
[2001(89)FLR694]; JT2001(1)SC117; (2001)ILLJ553SC; 2000(8)SCALE407; (2001)1UPLBEC346
In that context, reliance was placed by the High Court on the decision reported in Firestone Tyre & Rubber Co. of India Pvt. Ltd. v. Workmen 1981 (II) LLJ and ultimately the Division Bench held that the … writ petition was dismissed. An application filed by the petitioners herein under Section 17-B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 was allowed and it was directed that the 92 workmen should be paid every month an amount of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Management of Ram Lal Anand College Vs. the Workman Sh. C.L. Yadav ...
Delhi
Jan-31-2006
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 11A, 17B, 21 and 22; Minimum Wages Act; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; University Non-academic Staff Employees Regulations - Regulation 70 and 70(8)
2006(87)DRJ731; 2006(3)SLJ251(Delhi)
the Supreme Court, reported as N. Kalindi v. Tata Locomotive & Engg. Co. Ltd : (1960)IILLJ228SC and Dunlop Rubber Co. (India) Ltd. v. Workmen : (1965)ILLJ426SC , it was held that though in inquiry proceedings, it would … been established. The learned Single Judge had no jurisdiction, not even under Section 11-A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, to enter into the question whether the charges could have been established by better or further evidence. That … college issued a memorandum alleging certain objectionable conduct to the workman on 17. 1. 1976. He replied to it on 2. 2. 1976. By an
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGujarat State Road Transport Corporation Limited Vs. Bhikhalal Punabha ...
Gujarat
Feb-22-2002
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - sections 11A and 17B; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227
[2003(96)FLR60]
in view of the decision of the apex court in case of Workmen of M/s. Firestone Tyre and Rubber Co. of India P. Ltd. versus The Management and others reported in A.I.R. 1973 S.C. page 1227. Reliance … therefore, the labour court ought not to have exercised the powers under section 11-A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 in view of the act of serious misconduct and dishonesty and misappropriation on the part of the respondent … the petitioner has paid the wages to the respondent workman under section 17-B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 though the petition has been filed
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »