Advanced Search Results
Bright Trading Co. Vs. the Rubber Board and ors.
Kolkata
Jun-02-1986
Commercial
Rubber Act, 1947 - Sections 14, 15 and 23; ;Rubber Rules, 1955 - Rule 43B
AIR1987Cal169
in accordance with the terms and conditions laid down in the licence and also the provisions of the Rubber Act, 1947 and the Rubber Rules, 1955. Under the provisions of the Act and the Rules and also the terms … for a number of years. The licence was issued annually and the last such licence was issued on 14-2-1980 and was valid from 1st April, 1980 to 3lst March 1981. The petitioner's licence was suspended by the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN.P.K.R.R. Cooperative Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. the Commercial Tax Officer ...
Chennai
Aug-11-2010
Constitution
Constitution Of India - Article 226
said decision has to be understood in the light of the specific provision contained in Section 12 of Rubber Act 1947 and Section 5 read along with Entry 71 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act. Section 12 of … Clauses 3 and 5A of the Sugarcane Control Order and Section 10(2) of Act 20/1949 read along with Section 14 of the Madras Sugar Factories Control Act 1949. Section 2(r), Section 3(2) and Entry 22 of Part-E of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskT.T.K.-lig Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Dec-16-2005
Service Tax
(2006)(193)ELT169TriDel
importation, to the extent equal to the duty of excise levied as cess under Section 12 of the Rubber Act, 1947 on rubber produced/manufactured in India as on the said date? 2. It appears that the appellants had challenged … Supreme Court in R.C. Jail v. Union of India reported in 1998 (001) SCC 0616 SC (Paragraphs 13, 14 and 23), Barnagore jute Factory Co. v. Inspector of Central Excise and the decision of theAndhra Pradesh Paper
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
State of Kerala Vs. Madras Rubber Factory Ltd.
Supreme Court of India
Dec-19-1997
Sales TaxExcise
Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 2 and 5; Rubber Act, 1947 - Sections 12 and 12(1); Rubber (Amendment) Act, 1960; Rubber Rules - Rule 33D
AIR1998SC723; JT1997(10)SC298; 1998(1)KLT201(SC); 1997(7)SCALE804; (1998)1SCC616; [1997]Supp6SCR698; [1998]108STC583(SC)
arises for consideration in this batch of cases is whether the cess payable under the provisions of the Rubber Act, 1947 will form part of the purchase turnover of the respondents under the Kerala General Sales Tax, 1963.3. M/s. … the State of Kerala or was sent out of the State for use elsewhere.4. Under the provisions of Section 5 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Sales Tax Act') the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Kerala, represented by Joint Commissioner (Law) Vs. M/s. M.R. ...
Kerala
Jan-06-2016
Land Acquisition
supported by the Explanatory Note to the Notification. 13. Rubber Board is established under the provisions of the Rubber Act, 1947. Annexure R1(b) affidavit of the Corporate Manager of the assessee is filed placing therewith the certificate dated 13.06.2011 … would amount to hostile discrimination violative of the equality doctrine in Article 14 of the Constitution of India. It is further argued that the impugned … Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J. 1. These revisions under Section 41 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 and original petitions stand remitted by the Hon'ble Supreme
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJay Shree Tea Industries Ltd. and ors. Vs. Industrial Tribunal-i and o ...
Allahabad
Jan-28-2004
Labour and Industrial
Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 6W
2004(2)AWC959
been filed by Jay Shree Tea and Industries Ltd., a public sector company, and Jay Shree Tyres and Rubber Products as well as Sri R. P. Verma, a share holder in Jay Shree Tea and Industries Ltd., … share holder in Jay Shree Tea and Industries Ltd., to declare Section 6W of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as constitutionally bad and invalid, violative of Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India, and for a writ … No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. CJ, P.V. Hardas, Naresh H. Patil, R.M.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskL. Venkateswara Rao and ors. Vs. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Re ...
Andhra Pradesh
Jun-25-1993
CommercialCivil
Andhra Pradesh Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1966 - Rule 26(3); Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 15 and 21(5); Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 16 and 23; Constitution of India - Article 265
1993(3)ALT199
Association v. Union of India, : [1970]2SCR68 . It was a case arising under the provisions of the Rubber Act, 1947. Prior to the amendment made by the Rubber (Amendment) Act, 1960, the duty of excise was payable under … - 13 are not applicable to quarry leases or other mineral concessions in respect of minor minerals (vide Section 14).'Minor Minerals ' 'means building stones, gravel, ordinary clay, ordinary sand other than sand used for prescribed purposes, and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSudhir Chandra Sarkar Vs. Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Mar-27-1984
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 - Sections 4; Gratuity Rules - Rule 10; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 136; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Sections 4
AIR1984SC1064; [1984(49)FLR1]; 1984LabIC790; (1984)IILLJ223SC; 1984(1)SCALE586; (1984)3SCC369; [1984]3SCR325; 1984(16)LC986(SC)
govern the relationship between the parties. Workmen of Messrs Firestone Tyre & Rubber Co. of India (P) Ltd. v. Management and Ors. : (1973)ILLJ278SC Workmen … and civil suit would be the only remedy. In the case of workman governed by the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 33(c)(2) may provide an additional forum to recover monetary benefit. It is not suggested that plaintiff was a … enforced by a decree of civil court, the court will have to keep in view the provisions of Section 14 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 which provides that contract for personal service cannot be specifically enforced. We
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSurender Kumar vs Dayaparkash Gupta (Deceased) Thr Lrs
Delhi
Apr-01-2026
Land Acquisition
shop from his grandmother by virtue of the aforenoted Will wishes to set up his own business of rubber and latex which he was earliercarrying on with his father and in which he has gained expertise and … business. The manner in which the courts have gone into the meaning of "lockout" in the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 appears to us to be nothing but a perverse approach to the problem. One cannot imagine that a … This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent ControlAct, 1958, seeks the following prayers: -“It … * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RC.REV. 149/2020 & CM APPL. 11518/2020 SURENDER KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pramod K. Sharma,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMadras Rubber Factory Limited Vs. State of Kerala
Kerala
Mar-29-1989
Sales Tax
[1989]74STC56(Ker)
arises for consideration in these cases is whether the cess payable and paid by the manufacturers, under the Rubber Act, 1947 and the Rules, will form part of their purchase turnover, under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act. In … 1976-77 and 1977-78. The sole respondent in these three revisions is the Revenue. In these revisions, filed under Section 41 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, the revision petitioner prays to set aside or annul the … India on a reference made by the President of India under Article 143(1) of the Constitution of India. Broadly stated, 'duty of excise' is an
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »