Advanced Search Results

State of Tamil Nadu and anr. Vs. P. Krishnamurthy and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : EnvironmentCivil

Acts : Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 - Sections 4, 4A, 4A(1), 4A(2), 4A(3), 15, 17, 17A and 24A; Madras River Conservancy Act, 1884; Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) (Amendment) Act, 1986; Tamil Nadu Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1959 - Rules 1(3), 2(6), 8, 8A, 8C, 8(8), 8(11), 15, 36(1), 36(5) and 38A; Constitution of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC1622; JT2006(4)SC167; (2006)3MLJ313(SC); 2006(3)SCALE460; (2006)4SCC517

15 provides for absolute prohibition or regulation of quarrying or removal of sand from riverbeds to which Madras River Conservancy Act, 1884 has been extended and for regulating the quarrying or removal of sand from beds of river in charge … the term of such leases being three years or less, under Rule 8 of the Rules. It is stated that as on 2.10.2003, private agencies … minor minerals by making appropriate rules, in view of the power delegated to it by the Parliament under Section 15 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (for short the 'Act'). The power to

Alluri Narayana Murthy Raju Vs. Dist. Collector and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Contract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 32 and 56; Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Rivers Conservancy Act, 1884; Interest Act, 1978 - Sections 3 and 3(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 144; Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Auction of Sand in the Water Courses Vesting in Gram Panchayat) Rules, 2000 - Rules 5, 7, 8, 11 to 18, 19 and 26

Reported in : AIR2008AP264; 2008(6)ALD103

respondent No. 2 on 23.12.2000 calling for tenders for auctioning the right to quarry the sand in Gostani river in Maddi Gram Panchayat, Padmanabham Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, the petitioner made his application by paying necessary E.M.D. Respondent … of the auction or is lifting the sand against the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Rivers Conservancy Act, 1884.18. Sections 32 and 56 of the Act, which are very material for the present purpose, read as … Inspector of Police, Bheemunipatnam, respondent No. 5 initiated proceedings dated 24.12.2001 under Section 144, Cr.P.C. Despite the said measures, the villagers did not permit the … direction to respondent No. 2 to refund the bid amount of Rs. 8,35,000/- together with interest.2. The facts of the case are stated as under:In

The State of Madras Represented by the Collector of East Godavari at K ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Madras River Conservancy Act, 1884 - Sections 16 and 25; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 80 - Order 1, Rule 10; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 117

Reported in : AIR1952Mad510; (1951)IMLJ454

given two months time to pay the costs. Civil - compensation - Sections 16 and 25 of Madras River Conservancy Act, 1884, Section 117 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and Section 80 and Order 1 Rule 10 of Code of … the points involved in those appeals were the same as those in the first two appeals. Of these 8 suits, covered by the 9 appeals, 4 were filed by the Maharajah of Pithapuram, his son the Kumararajah,

The Secretary of State for India in Council Vs. Sri Rajah Bommadevara ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 58Ind.Cas.689

year, the villages have been held on ordinary ryotwary, tenure.19. In 1894 operations were begun under the Rivers Conservancy Act (Mad. Act VI of 1884) with the object of confining the course of the river Kistna within defined … land really belonged to B is removed. (The Limitation Act relieves against ignorance only in case s under sections 5, 14 and 18). It has been held that even ignorance of his dispossession will not save the … Secretary of State for India 47 Ind. Cas. 606 : 41 M.P 840 : 35 M.L.J. 159 : (1918) M.W.N. 662 applies, and the bed

Haveliram Shetty Vs. Maharaja of Morvi

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : AIR1945Bom88; (1944)46BOMLR877

within certain limits, was vested in those undertakers for the purposes of conservation and improvement, by several special Acts. The Ouse Improvement Act, 1884, incorporated … vested in those undertakers for the purposes of conservation and improvement, by several special Acts. The Ouse Improvement Act, 1884, incorporated some of the powers and provisions of the Harbours, Docks, and Piers Clauses Act, 1847, including Section … by getting a certificate from the Controller under the proviso to Clause 8 thereof. Accordingly, the Court of Appeal sent the matter back to the … found in Barraclough v. Brown [18971 A.C. 615. In that case the undertakers of the navigation of the riversAirs and Calder by its secretary were given statutory rights to sue; on their behalf. The navigation of the

Hynes Vs. Grimes Packing Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

Indians or Eskimos by section 8 of the Act of May 17, 1884 (23 Stat. 26), or by section 14 or section 15 of the … 337 U. S. 94 spoken of in Order No. 128, establishing the reservation is situated on the Karluk River, long recognized as one of the most important salmon spawning streams of Alaska. The natives live at its … created under § 2 of the Act of May 1, 1936. Pp. 337 U. S. 118 -119. (c) Section 8 of the White Act does not make exclusive the power of the Territorial Legislature to license fishing. P. … (b) The White Act, the purpose of which was to protect and conserve the fisheries of Alaska on a nonmonopolistic basis, Page 337 U. S.

Srimanthu Rajah Yarlagadda Sivarama Prasad Bhadur Zamindar Vs. State o ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114; Constitution of India - Article 226; Easements Act, 1882 - Sections 15

Reported in : AIR1973AP281

of Newill in 1854, or the fact that the Government carried on conservation of rivers according to the river conservancy, 1884 and handed over the lanka lands back to the petitioner it would not make out his case … in respect of Items 2 to 7 and a portion of Item 8. The petitioner preferred appeal in regard to Items 8, 10, 11, 13, … been given by the tribunal against the petitioner.2. The estate of Devarakota was notified under the Estates Abolition Act and taken over by the State Government on 7-9-1949. The petitioner, who is a landholder, applied for the … petitioner, who is a landholder, applied for the grant of patta under Section 12(a) of the act in respect of several items of lanka lands

Arizona Vs. California

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

1931 283 U.S. 423 Syllabus 1. The United States has power to construct a dam across a navigable river for the purpose of improving navigation, and need not first obtain approval of its plans by the state … specified purpose of regulating the flow and preventing floods in this interstate river; or as a means of conserving and apportioning its waters among the states equitably entitled thereto, or for the purpose of performing international obligations. … Arizona, (1930), vol. i, pp. 216-36. By the Act of July 5, 1884, c. 229, 23 Stat. 133, 144, Congress appropriated $25,000 for the improvement … it. P. 283 U. S. 454 . 5. The Boulder Canyon Project Act, December 21, 1928, authorizes the Secretary of the Interior at the expense … her legal right to appropriate water. Id. (3) Section 18 of the Act declares that nothing in … -359; United States v. Doremus, 249 U. S. 86 , 249 U. S. 93 -94; Dakota Central

Antoine Vs. Washington

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

] The original reservation was over 3 million acres "bounded on the east and south by the Columbia River, on the west by the Okanagan River, and on the north by the British possessions." Exec.Order of July … of commercial fishing [and hunting], and the like may be regulated by the State in the interest of conservation, provided the regulation meets appropriate standards and does not discriminate against the Indians." The "appropriate standards" requirement means … State in 1889, 26 Stat. 1552, and, the next year, by the Act of Aug.19, 1890, 26 Stat. 355, Congress created the Commission that negotiated … "Any person who hunts . . . deer in violation of this section is guilty of a gross misdemeanor. . . ." Section 77.16.030 provides … 380 . Pp. 420 U. S. 205 -206. 82 Wash.2d 440, 511 P.2d 1351, reversed and remanded.

Regional Rail Reorganization Act Cases

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

Arbor ( In re Ann Arbor R. Co., Bky. No. 74-90833, ED Mich.), and the Lehigh & Hudson River ( In re Lehigh & Hudson River R. Co., No. 72-B-419, SDNY). The following lessors of leased lines … proceeding." The District Court declared this part of § 207(b) "null and void, as violative of Article I, Section 8, Clause 4 . . . ," [ Footnote 13 ] and enjoined Page 419 U. S. 121 "all … for use for other public purposes, including highways, other forms of transportation, conservation, energy transmission, education or health care facilities, or recreation . . . … Regional Rail Reorganization Act Cases - 419 U.S. 102 (1974) U.S. Supreme Court Regional Rail Reorganization