Advanced Search Results
The Secretary of State for India in Council Represented by the Collect ...
Chennai
Apr-19-1928
Land Acquisition
118Ind.Cas.273
mesne profits. The Government was in possession of the Kistna River under the provisions of Act VI of 1884. Section 11 of the Act runs as follows:After such surveys shall have been completed and approved and the notification … having asked for permission and no permission having been refused is not entitled to compensation under the Rivers Conservancy Act and it cannot be said that Government has asserted a hostile title against him or that the decision … Secretary of State for India v. Bommadevara Venkatanarasinha Naidu 58 Ind. Cas. 689 : (1920) M.W.N. 209 : 11 L.W. 256 : 27 M.L.T. 147.]2.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Tamil Nadu and anr. Vs. P. Krishnamurthy and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Mar-24-2006
EnvironmentCivil
Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 - Sections 4, 4A, 4A(1), 4A(2), 4A(3), 15, 17, 17A and 24A; Madras River Conservancy Act, 1884; Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) (Amendment) Act, 1986; Tamil Nadu Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1959 - Rules 1(3), 2(6), 8, 8A, 8C, 8(8), 8(11), 15, 36(1), 36(5) and 38A; Constitution of India
AIR2006SC1622; JT2006(4)SC167; (2006)3MLJ313(SC); 2006(3)SCALE460; (2006)4SCC517
15 provides for absolute prohibition or regulation of quarrying or removal of sand from riverbeds to which Madras River Conservancy Act, 1884 has been extended and for regulating the quarrying or removal of sand from beds of river in charge … minor minerals by making appropriate rules, in view of the power delegated to it by the Parliament under Section 15 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (for short the 'Act'). The power to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskV. Narasimha Rao Vs. the Government of Andhra Pradesh,indust
Andhra Pradesh
Jan-31-2012
Property
Andhra Pradesh Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1966, - Sections 9-K(3), 9-N, 35-A, 11(2)(c), 4(a), 9-B(5)
the safety of the river, its course and river bed, and exercises power under the A.P. (Andhra Area) River Conservancy Act, 1884; he has jurisdiction over both the left and right banks of the Krishna river, and at the KC … as the issue involved was in the orbit of the High Court. 6. In his subsequent report dated 15.06.2010, the River Conservator stated that the … all of them located in Gunutr District for transportation of the sand quarried at reach No.8, Amaravati. 24. Section 9-I(2) requires the successful tenderer/bidder to execute a lease deed with the Assistant Director of Mines and Geology
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mohd. MohsinuddIn Vs. the Government of A.P., Rep. by Its Prin
Andhra Pradesh
Jan-19-2012
Land Acquisition
the safety of the river, its course and river bed, and exercises power under the A.P. (Andhra Area) River Conservancy Act, 1884; he has jurisdiction over both the left and right banks of the Krishna river, and at the KC … (2010) 10 SCC 32.3) (1998) 1 SC”4. (2008) 3 SCC 54.5) (1996) 6 SCC 58.6) 2011(3) ALD 68.(DB) 7) 2001(4) SCC 53.8) 2003(1) SCC 69.9) … ramps all of them located in Gunutr District for transportation of the sand quarried at reach No.8, Amaravati.24. Section 9-I(2) requires the successful tenderer/bidder to execute a lease deed with the Assistant Director of Mines and Geology
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAlluri Narayana Murthy Raju Vs. Dist. Collector and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Sep-02-2008
Contract
Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 32 and 56; Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Rivers Conservancy Act, 1884; Interest Act, 1978 - Sections 3 and 3(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 144; Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Auction of Sand in the Water Courses Vesting in Gram Panchayat) Rules, 2000 - Rules 5, 7, 8, 11 to 18, 19 and 26
AIR2008AP264; 2008(6)ALD103
respondent No. 2 on 23.12.2000 calling for tenders for auctioning the right to quarry the sand in Gostani river in Maddi Gram Panchayat, Padmanabham Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, the petitioner made his application by paying necessary E.M.D. Respondent … of the auction or is lifting the sand against the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Rivers Conservancy Act, 1884.18. Sections 32 and 56 of the Act, which are very material for the present purpose, read as … Inspector of Police, Bheemunipatnam, respondent No. 5 initiated proceedings dated 24.12.2001 under Section 144, Cr.P.C. Despite the said measures, the villagers did not permit the … file complaint to the police, who registered the same as Crime No. 68 of 2001 of Padmanabham Police Station. On information given by the Inspector
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Madras Represented by the Collector of East Godavari at K ...
Chennai
Oct-31-1950
PropertyCivil
Madras River Conservancy Act, 1884 - Sections 16 and 25; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 80 - Order 1, Rule 10; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 117
AIR1952Mad510; (1951)IMLJ454
given two months time to pay the costs. Civil - compensation - Sections 16 and 25 of Madras River Conservancy Act, 1884, Section 117 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and Section 80 and Order 1 Rule 10 of Code of … 1884, was not precluded by Section 25 of Act which was only an enabling & not an exhaustive section. 6. In the end, he gave the plffs. In O. S. No. 34 of 1941 a decree' for Rs.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Secretary of State for India in Council Vs. Sri Rajah Bommadevara ...
Chennai
Aug-27-1919
Civil
58Ind.Cas.689
year, the villages have been held on ordinary ryotwary, tenure.19. In 1894 operations were begun under the Rivers Conservancy Act (Mad. Act VI of 1884) with the object of confining the course of the river Kistna within defined … land really belonged to B is removed. (The Limitation Act relieves against ignorance only in case s under sections 5, 14 and 18). It has been held that even ignorance of his dispossession will not save the … Venkata Lakshmi Narasamma v. Secretary of State for India 47 Ind. Cas. 606 : 41 M.P 840 : 35 M.L.J. 159 : (1918) M.W.N. 662
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Koneru Suryanarayana and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Jun-12-1962
CivilProperty
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 1; Madras Rivers Conservancy Act, 1884 - Sections 3, 7, 11, 12 and 13
AIR1963AP94
claiming the accretions as theirs, though in that case the nanal grass was planted by the Government for river conservancy. I do not know whether this case is strictly in point, for the reason that it was found … of the Government, and, is therefore, in contravention of Sections 11, 12 and 13 of the Madras Rivers Conservancy Act (Act VI of 1884). Accordingly it is contended that the planting of nanal grass constitutes an illegal operation, … the reformation in situ. These formations of accretions are dealt with in Section 4 of the Bengal Regulation XI of 1825. We are in this … appeal is directed against the judgment and decree in O. S. No. 67 of 1953 on the file of the Subordinate Judge's Court, Masulipatam. The
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSecy. of State Vs. (Bommadevara) Satyanarayana Varaprasada Rao Bahadur ...
Chennai
Apr-19-1928
Property
AIR1929Mad520
mesne profits. The Government was in possession of the Kistna river under the provisions of Act 6 of 1884. Section 11 of the Act runs as follows:After such surveys shall have been completed and approved and the notification … having asked for permission and no permission having been refu6ed is not entitled to compensation under the Rivers Conservancy Act and it cannot be said that Government has asserted a hostile title against him or that the decision
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHaveliram Shetty Vs. Maharaja of Morvi
Mumbai
Apr-06-1944
Tenancy
AIR1945Bom88; (1944)46BOMLR877
within certain limits, was vested in those undertakers for the purposes of conservation and improvement, by several special Acts. The Ouse Improvement Act, 1884, incorporated … vested in those undertakers for the purposes of conservation and improvement, by several special Acts. The Ouse Improvement Act, 1884, incorporated some of the powers and provisions of the Harbours, Docks, and Piers Clauses Act, 1847, including Section … found in Barraclough v. Brown [18971 A.C. 615. In that case the undertakers of the navigation of the riversAirs and Calder by its secretary were given statutory rights to sue; on their behalf. The navigation of the … our attention to the English cases under the Defence (General) Regulations, Reg. 62, whereby the Minister of Agriculture and Fisheries has to give a consent,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »