Advanced Search Results

Mohd. MohsinuddIn Vs. the Government of A.P., Rep. by Its Prin

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

the safety of the river, its course and river bed, and exercises power under the A.P. (Andhra Area) River Conservancy Act, 1884; he has jurisdiction over both the left and right banks of the Krishna river, and at the KC … ramps all of them located in Gunutr District for transportation of the sand quarried at reach No.8, Amaravati.24. Section 9-I(2) requires the successful tenderer/bidder to execute a lease deed with the Assistant Director of Mines and Geology … SCC 44.2) (2010) 10 SCC 32.3) (1998) 1 SC”4. (2008) 3 SCC 54.5) (1996) 6 SCC 58.6) 2011(3) ALD 68.(DB) 7) 2001(4) SCC 53.8) 2003(1)

V. Narasimha Rao Vs. the Government of Andhra Pradesh,indust

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1966, - Sections 9-K(3), 9-N, 35-A, 11(2)(c), 4(a), 9-B(5)

the safety of the river, its course and river bed, and exercises power under the A.P. (Andhra Area) River Conservancy Act, 1884; he has jurisdiction over both the left and right banks of the Krishna river, and at the KC … quarrying, and revenue sharing, was worked out by the District Level Committee. 5. The River Conservator, vide letter dated 01.06.2010, informed the Joint Collector-cum-Chairman, District … all of them located in Gunutr District for transportation of the sand quarried at reach No.8, Amaravati. 24. Section 9-I(2) requires the successful tenderer/bidder to execute a lease deed with the Assistant Director of Mines and Geology

State of Tamil Nadu and anr. Vs. P. Krishnamurthy and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : EnvironmentCivil

Acts : Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 - Sections 4, 4A, 4A(1), 4A(2), 4A(3), 15, 17, 17A and 24A; Madras River Conservancy Act, 1884; Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) (Amendment) Act, 1986; Tamil Nadu Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1959 - Rules 1(3), 2(6), 8, 8A, 8C, 8(8), 8(11), 15, 36(1), 36(5) and 38A; Constitution of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC1622; JT2006(4)SC167; (2006)3MLJ313(SC); 2006(3)SCALE460; (2006)4SCC517

15 provides for absolute prohibition or regulation of quarrying or removal of sand from riverbeds to which Madras River Conservancy Act, 1884 has been extended and for regulating the quarrying or removal of sand from beds of river in charge … minor minerals by making appropriate rules, in view of the power delegated to it by the Parliament under Section 15 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (for short the 'Act'). The power to … disposing of the said writ petition. A contempt petition (Contempt Application No. 561/2001) was filed complaining of non-implementation of the said directions by the State

Alluri Narayana Murthy Raju Vs. Dist. Collector and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Contract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 32 and 56; Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Rivers Conservancy Act, 1884; Interest Act, 1978 - Sections 3 and 3(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 144; Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Auction of Sand in the Water Courses Vesting in Gram Panchayat) Rules, 2000 - Rules 5, 7, 8, 11 to 18, 19 and 26

Reported in : AIR2008AP264; 2008(6)ALD103

respondent No. 2 on 23.12.2000 calling for tenders for auctioning the right to quarry the sand in Gostani river in Maddi Gram Panchayat, Padmanabham Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, the petitioner made his application by paying necessary E.M.D. Respondent … of the auction or is lifting the sand against the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Rivers Conservancy Act, 1884.18. Sections 32 and 56 of the Act, which are very material for the present purpose, read as … Inspector of Police, Bheemunipatnam, respondent No. 5 initiated proceedings dated 24.12.2001 under Section 144, Cr.P.C. Despite the said measures, the villagers did not permit the

The State of Madras Represented by the Collector of East Godavari at K ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Madras River Conservancy Act, 1884 - Sections 16 and 25; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 80 - Order 1, Rule 10; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 117

Reported in : AIR1952Mad510; (1951)IMLJ454

given two months time to pay the costs. Civil - compensation - Sections 16 and 25 of Madras River Conservancy Act, 1884, Section 117 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and Section 80 and Order 1 Rule 10 of Code of … 1945, covered by A. S. No. 252 of 1948. the same Ravi Subbarayudu claimed a compensation of Rs. 500 for the same land for the year 1943-44 owing to refusal of permission to cultivate. In O. S.

The Secretary of State for India in Council Vs. Sri Rajah Bommadevara ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 58Ind.Cas.689

year, the villages have been held on ordinary ryotwary, tenure.19. In 1894 operations were begun under the Rivers Conservancy Act (Mad. Act VI of 1884) with the object of confining the course of the river Kistna within defined … land really belonged to B is removed. (The Limitation Act relieves against ignorance only in case s under sections 5, 14 and 18). It has been held that even ignorance of his dispossession will not save the

The Secretary of State for India in Council Represented by the Collect ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 118Ind.Cas.273

mesne profits. The Government was in possession of the Kistna River under the provisions of Act VI of 1884. Section 11 of the Act runs as follows:After such surveys shall have been completed and approved and the notification … having asked for permission and no permission having been refused is not entitled to compensation under the Rivers Conservancy Act and it cannot be said that Government has asserted a hostile title against him or that the decision … his estate [cf. Secretary of State for India v. Bommadevara Venkatanarasinha Naidu 58 Ind. Cas. 689 : (1920) M.W.N. 209 : 11 L.W. 256 :

State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Koneru Suryanarayana and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 1; Madras Rivers Conservancy Act, 1884 - Sections 3, 7, 11, 12 and 13

Reported in : AIR1963AP94

claiming the accretions as theirs, though in that case the nanal grass was planted by the Government for river conservancy. I do not know whether this case is strictly in point, for the reason that it was found … of the Government, and, is therefore, in contravention of Sections 11, 12 and 13 of the Madras Rivers Conservancy Act (Act VI of 1884). Accordingly it is contended that the planting of nanal grass constitutes an illegal operation, … the reformation in situ. These formations of accretions are dealt with in Section 4 of the Bengal Regulation XI of 1825. We are in this … behalf of all the owners of the lands covered by patta No. 50 of Bobberlanka village, claiming possession of an extent of 32 acres of

Secy. of State Vs. (Bommadevara) Satyanarayana Varaprasada Rao Bahadur ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1929Mad520

mesne profits. The Government was in possession of the Kistna river under the provisions of Act 6 of 1884. Section 11 of the Act runs as follows:After such surveys shall have been completed and approved and the notification … having asked for permission and no permission having been refu6ed is not entitled to compensation under the Rivers Conservancy Act and it cannot be said that Government has asserted a hostile title against him or that the decision … conviction before a Magistrate, be liable to a fine not exceeding Rs. 500, or in default of payment, to simple imprisonment cot exceeding throe months

Arizona Vs. California

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

Arizona, (1930), vol. i, pp. 216-36. By the Act of July 5, 1884, c. 229, 23 Stat. 133, 144, Congress appropriated $25,000 for the improvement … 1931 283 U.S. 423 Syllabus 1. The United States has power to construct a dam across a navigable river for the purpose of improving navigation, and need not first obtain approval of its plans by the state … specified purpose of regulating the flow and preventing floods in this interstate river; or as a means of conserving and apportioning its waters among the states equitably entitled thereto, or for the purpose of performing international obligations. … it. P. 283 U. S. 454 . 5. The Boulder Canyon Project Act, December 21, 1928, authorizes the Secretary of the Interior at the expense … her legal right to appropriate water. Id. (3) Section 18 of the Act declares that nothing in