Advanced Search Results

Alluri Narayana Murthy Raju Vs. Dist. Collector and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Contract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 32 and 56; Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Rivers Conservancy Act, 1884; Interest Act, 1978 - Sections 3 and 3(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 144; Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Auction of Sand in the Water Courses Vesting in Gram Panchayat) Rules, 2000 - Rules 5, 7, 8, 11 to 18, 19 and 26

Reported in : AIR2008AP264; 2008(6)ALD103

for tenders for auctioning the right to quarry the sand in Gostani river in Maddi Gram Panchayat, Padmanabham Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, the petitioner made his … of the auction or is lifting the sand against the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Rivers Conservancy Act, 1884.18. Sections 32 and 56 of the Act, which are very material for the present purpose, read as … the period up to the institution of proceedings is governed by the provisions of the Interest Act, 1978. Section 3(1) of the said Act reads as follows:3. Power of Court to allow interest: (1) In any proceedings for

V. Narasimha Rao Vs. the Government of Andhra Pradesh,indust

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1966, - Sections 9-K(3), 9-N, 35-A, 11(2)(c), 4(a), 9-B(5)

the safety of the river, its course and river bed, and exercises power under the A.P. (Andhra Area) River Conservancy Act, 1884; he has jurisdiction over both the left and right banks of the Krishna river, and at the KC … all of them located in Gunutr District for transportation of the sand quarried at reach No.8, Amaravati. 24. Section 9-I(2) requires the successful tenderer/bidder to execute a lease deed with the Assistant Director of Mines and Geology … Assistant Director of Mines and Geology, Guntur. The said lease agreement dated 31.03.2010 detailed the limits of the Amaravathi reach as the revenue limits of

Mohd. MohsinuddIn Vs. the Government of A.P., Rep. by Its Prin

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

the safety of the river, its course and river bed, and exercises power under the A.P. (Andhra Area) River Conservancy Act, 1884; he has jurisdiction over both the left and right banks of the Krishna river, and at the KC … Kumar Addl. Advocate General Citations:1. (1982) 2 SCC 44.2) (2010) 10 SCC 32.3) (1998) 1 SC”4. (2008) 3 SCC 54.5) (1996) 6 SCC 58.6) 2011(3) … ramps all of them located in Gunutr District for transportation of the sand quarried at reach No.8, Amaravati.24. Section 9-I(2) requires the successful tenderer/bidder to execute a lease deed with the Assistant Director of Mines and Geology

State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Koneru Suryanarayana and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 1; Madras Rivers Conservancy Act, 1884 - Sections 3, 7, 11, 12 and 13

Reported in : AIR1963AP94

claiming the accretions as theirs, though in that case the nanal grass was planted by the Government for river conservancy. I do not know whether this case is strictly in point, for the reason that it was found … of the Government, and, is therefore, in contravention of Sections 11, 12 and 13 of the Madras Rivers Conservancy Act (Act VI of 1884). Accordingly it is contended that the planting of nanal grass constitutes an illegal operation, … of the Act to the instant case, as contended for by Mr. Sambasivarao, depends upon the survey under Section 3 and the notification under Section 7 of the Act. Whether the river was so surveyed and notified or

State of Tamil Nadu and anr. Vs. P. Krishnamurthy and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : EnvironmentCivil

Acts : Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 - Sections 4, 4A, 4A(1), 4A(2), 4A(3), 15, 17, 17A and 24A; Madras River Conservancy Act, 1884; Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) (Amendment) Act, 1986; Tamil Nadu Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1959 - Rules 1(3), 2(6), 8, 8A, 8C, 8(8), 8(11), 15, 36(1), 36(5) and 38A; Constitution of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC1622; JT2006(4)SC167; (2006)3MLJ313(SC); 2006(3)SCALE460; (2006)4SCC517

15 provides for absolute prohibition or regulation of quarrying or removal of sand from riverbeds to which Madras River Conservancy Act, 1884 has been extended and for regulating the quarrying or removal of sand from beds of river in charge … contend that Rule 38A does not conform to Section 4A(3) of the Act. It is pointed out that Sub-section (3) of Section 4A of the Act mandates that no order making a premature termination of a mining lease

The State of Madras Represented by the Collector of East Godavari at K ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Madras River Conservancy Act, 1884 - Sections 16 and 25; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 80 - Order 1, Rule 10; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 117

Reported in : AIR1952Mad510; (1951)IMLJ454

given two months time to pay the costs. Civil - compensation - Sections 16 and 25 of Madras River Conservancy Act, 1884, Section 117 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and Section 80 and Order 1 Rule 10 of Code of … Yuvarani, who was the lessee in respect of the suit lands. These four suits are O. S. Nos. 34 of 1941, 29 of 1943, 14 of 1944 & 61 of 1944. 10 those suite the plffs. had

Srimanthu Rajah Yarlagadda Sivarama Prasad Bhadur Zamindar Vs. State o ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114; Constitution of India - Article 226; Easements Act, 1882 - Sections 15

Reported in : AIR1973AP281

of Newill in 1854, or the fact that the Government carried on conservation of rivers according to the river conservancy, 1884 and handed over the lanka lands back to the petitioner it would not make out his case … to dispose of the petitions.59. It was however contended that the test of private land as defined in Section 3 (10) of the Estates Land Act has not been properly applied to individual cases and therefore we should

Haveliram Shetty Vs. Maharaja of Morvi

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : AIR1945Bom88; (1944)46BOMLR877

within certain limits, was vested in those undertakers for the purposes of conservation and improvement, by several special Acts. The Ouse Improvement Act, 1884, incorporated … vested in those undertakers for the purposes of conservation and improvement, by several special Acts. The Ouse Improvement Act, 1884, incorporated some of the powers and provisions of the Harbours, Docks, and Piers Clauses Act, 1847, including Section … executive or administrative powers and not powers of legislation. In this connection it was pointed out that under Section 3 of the Defence of India Act the Rules and Orders passed under the Act had the effect of … A.C. 615. In that case the undertakers of the navigation of the riversAirs and Calder by its secretary were given statutory rights to sue; on

Hynes Vs. Grimes Packing Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

337 U. S. 94 spoken of in Order No. 128, establishing the reservation is situated on the Karluk River, long recognized as one of the most important salmon spawning streams of Alaska. The natives live at its … Indians or Eskimos by section 8 of the Act of May 17, 1884 (23 Stat. 26), or by section 14 or section 15 of the … in the county jail, or by both such fine and imprisonment, and in case of the violation of section 3 of said Act approved June 26, 1906, as amended, there may be imposed a further fine not exceeding … (b) The White Act, the purpose of which was to protect and conserve the fisheries of Alaska on a nonmonopolistic basis, Page 337 U. S.

The Secretary of State for India in Council Represented by the Collect ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 118Ind.Cas.273

mesne profits. The Government was in possession of the Kistna River under the provisions of Act VI of 1884. Section 11 of the Act runs as follows:After such surveys shall have been completed and approved and the notification … having asked for permission and no permission having been refused is not entitled to compensation under the Rivers Conservancy Act and it cannot be said that Government has asserted a hostile title against him or that the decision … wrongful and awarded the zemindar mesne profits at the rate of Rs. 30 per acre. It is from this decision that the Government appeals. The