Advanced Search Results
Alluri Narayana Murthy Raju Vs. Dist. Collector and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Sep-02-2008
Contract
Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 32 and 56; Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Rivers Conservancy Act, 1884; Interest Act, 1978 - Sections 3 and 3(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 144; Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Auction of Sand in the Water Courses Vesting in Gram Panchayat) Rules, 2000 - Rules 5, 7, 8, 11 to 18, 19 and 26
AIR2008AP264; 2008(6)ALD103
respondent No. 2 on 23.12.2000 calling for tenders for auctioning the right to quarry the sand in Gostani river in Maddi Gram Panchayat, Padmanabham Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, the petitioner made his application by paying necessary E.M.D. Respondent … of the auction or is lifting the sand against the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Rivers Conservancy Act, 1884.18. Sections 32 and 56 of the Act, which are very material for the present purpose, read as … Inspector of Police, Bheemunipatnam, respondent No. 5 initiated proceedings dated 24.12.2001 under Section 144, Cr.P.C. Despite the said measures, the villagers did not permit the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Secretary of State for India in Council Vs. Sri Rajah Bommadevara ...
Chennai
Aug-27-1919
Civil
58Ind.Cas.689
year, the villages have been held on ordinary ryotwary, tenure.19. In 1894 operations were begun under the Rivers Conservancy Act (Mad. Act VI of 1884) with the object of confining the course of the river Kistna within defined … following passage in page 255:-- (Ayacut of river to the above limit, 235 acres, above this point there are not likely to be any disputes … land really belonged to B is removed. (The Limitation Act relieves against ignorance only in case s under sections 5, 14 and 18). It has been held that even ignorance of his dispossession will not save the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Madras Represented by the Collector of East Godavari at K ...
Chennai
Oct-31-1950
PropertyCivil
Madras River Conservancy Act, 1884 - Sections 16 and 25; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 80 - Order 1, Rule 10; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 117
AIR1952Mad510; (1951)IMLJ454
given two months time to pay the costs. Civil - compensation - Sections 16 and 25 of Madras River Conservancy Act, 1884, Section 117 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and Section 80 and Order 1 Rule 10 of Code of … & proportionate costs of Rs. 120-9-0 & dismissed the rest of the claim with proportionate costs of Rs. 23-9-2. The Govt. have filed A. S. No. 253 of 1948. There is no memo, of cross-objections. In O.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Hynes Vs. Grimes Packing Co.
US Supreme Court
May-31-1949
Land Acquisition
Indians or Eskimos by section 8 of the Act of May 17, 1884 (23 Stat. 26), or by section 14 or section 15 of the … 337 U. S. 94 spoken of in Order No. 128, establishing the reservation is situated on the Karluk River, long recognized as one of the most important salmon spawning streams of Alaska. The natives live at its … P. 337 U. S. 118 . (b) The White Act, the purpose of which was to protect and conserve the fisheries of Alaska on a nonmonopolistic basis, Page 337 U. S. 88 authorizes the establishment of preserves
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskWyoming Vs. Colorado
US Supreme Court
Jun-05-1922
Land Acquisition
determining this controversy, in which Wyoming seeks to prevent diversion of water from the headwaters of the Laramie River in Colorado for use in irrigating Colorado lands, to the detriment of prior irrigation appropriations made from the … Page 259 U. S. 473 of flow such as extreme flow of 1884 would be impractical to the extent that it exceeded the ordinary high … appropriation lays upon each state a duty to exercise her right reasonably and in a manner calculated to conserve the common supply. P. 259 U. S. 484 . 10. The evidence establishes: (a) The average yearly flow … part in Wyoming. When this suit was brought, the two corporate defendants, acting under the authority and permission of Colorado, were proceeding to divert in … 262, § 9, 14 Stat. 251, contained a section providing: "Whenever, by priority of possession, rights to … one." The Act of July 9, 1870, c. 235, § 17, 16 Stat. 217, provided that "all
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArizona Vs. California
US Supreme Court
May-18-1931
Land Acquisition
Arizona, (1930), vol. i, pp. 216-36. By the Act of July 5, 1884, c. 229, 23 Stat. 133, 144, Congress appropriated $25,000 for the improvement … 1931 283 U.S. 423 Syllabus 1. The United States has power to construct a dam across a navigable river for the purpose of improving navigation, and need not first obtain approval of its plans by the state … specified purpose of regulating the flow and preventing floods in this interstate river; or as a means of conserving and apportioning its waters among the states equitably entitled thereto, or for the purpose of performing international obligations. … it. P. 283 U. S. 454 . 5. The Boulder Canyon Project Act, December 21, 1928, authorizes the Secretary of the Interior at the expense … her legal right to appropriate water. Id. (3) Section 18 of the Act declares that nothing in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAntoine Vs. Washington
US Supreme Court
Feb-19-1975
Land Acquisition
] The original reservation was over 3 million acres "bounded on the east and south by the Columbia River, on the west by the Okanagan River, and on the north by the British possessions." Exec.Order of July … of commercial fishing [and hunting], and the like may be regulated by the State in the interest of conservation, provided the regulation meets appropriate standards and does not discriminate against the Indians." The "appropriate standards" requirement means … State in 1889, 26 Stat. 1552, and, the next year, by the Act of Aug.19, 1890, 26 Stat. 355, Congress created the Commission that negotiated … "Any person who hunts . . . deer in violation of this section is guilty of a gross misdemeanor. . . ." Section 77.16.030 provides … U. S. 665 ; Perrin v. United States, 232 U. S. 478 . Pp. 420 U. S.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMorris Vs. Duby
US Supreme Court
Apr-18-1927
Land Acquisition
nor the earlier post road acts, Rev.Stat. § 3964; Act March 1, 1884, c. 9, 23 Stat. 3, do that." The mere fact that a … plaintiffs below, the appellants here, owned and operated for hire, under proper license, motor trucks on the Columbia River Highway in Oregon from the east boundary of Multnomah County to the west limits of the City of … no provision, express or implied, by which there is withheld from the state its ordinary police power to conserve the highways in the interest of the public and to prescribe such reasonable regulations for their use as … to protect highways from damage by vehicles is not affected by the Acts of Congress providing for national and state cooperation in the construction of … damage of any highway or highways or any sections thereof to reduce the maximum weights and speeds
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Secretary of State for India in Council, by the District Forest Of ...
Chennai
Mar-07-1905
Property
(1905)15MLJ147
of immemorial forests which yielded none. We know that ' Tippu introduced rules of draconic severity for the conservancy of sandalwood for his revenue and teak for his navy' (Sturrock's Manual of South Canara District, p. 16). … in G. 0., dated 20th May 1865, No. 359 (Exhibit 0). In 1884 when Mr. Sturrock made an exhaustive enquiry into the actual state of … first of these heads comprehends all lands overflowed by the sea, or torn up or washed away by rivers and nullahs, and ancient waste lands which had been in that state ever since the Byjanuggur Government, and … which Government proposed to reserve as Government Reserved Forest under the Forest Act of 1882.2. The important question of principle that is raised is with … granted (Exhibit U of printed documents in A. Section 26). But even if it were the universal … it was decided by Government (G. 0., dated 23rd May I860 R. D.) that the entry of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrafulla Kamini Roy Vs. Bhabani Nath Roy
Kolkata
Jul-08-1925
Family
(1925)ILR52Cal1018
enactment pro tanto must be deemed to have been repealed by the later one: The Conservators of the River Thames v. Hall (1868) L. R. 3 C. P. 415 and Emperor v. Probhat Chandra Barua (1924) I. … of Section 98, Civil Procedure Code, for I am satisfied that since 1884 when the Full Bench delivered judgment in the case of Gossami Sri … Dewani Adalat. Now, in the case of an appeal to the Suddar Dewani Adalat, it was provided by Section 23 of Act XIII of 1861 thatif an appeal lies to the Suddar Court, it shall be heard and … But a reversionary heir thus appealing to the Court truly for the conservation and just administration of the property does so in a representative capacity
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›