Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: river conservancy act 1884 section 2 · Page 1 of about 23 results (0.038 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 24 2006

State of Tamil Nadu and anr. Vs. P. Krishnamurthy and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-24-2006

Subject : EnvironmentCivil

Acts : Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 - Sections 4, 4A, 4A(1), 4A(2), 4A(3), 15, 17, 17A and 24A; Madras River Conservancy Act, 1884; Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) (Amendment) Act, 1986; Tamil Nadu Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1959 - Rules 1(3), 2(6), 8, 8A, 8C, 8(8), 8(11), 15, 36(1), 36(5) and 38A; Constitution of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC1622; JT2006(4)SC167; (2006)3MLJ313(SC); 2006(3)SCALE460; (2006)4SCC517

15 provides for absolute prohibition or regulation of quarrying or removal of sand from riverbeds to which Madras River Conservancy Act, 1884 has been extended and for regulating the quarrying or removal of sand from beds of river in charge … minor minerals by making appropriate rules, in view of the power delegated to it by the Parliament under Section 15 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (for short the 'Act'). The power to … proceedings, the High Court issued a direction to the State Government on 26.7.2002 to constitute a High Level Committee consisting of scientists, geologists and environmentalists

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 19 2012

Mohd. MohsinuddIn Vs. the Government of A.P., Rep. by Its Prin

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-19-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

the safety of the river, its course and river bed, and exercises power under the A.P. (Andhra Area) River Conservancy Act, 1884; he has jurisdiction over both the left and right banks of the Krishna river, and at the KC … ramps all of them located in Gunutr District for transportation of the sand quarried at reach No.8, Amaravati.24. Section 9-I(2) requires the successful tenderer/bidder to execute a lease deed with the Assistant Director of Mines and Geology

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 31 2012

V. Narasimha Rao Vs. the Government of Andhra Pradesh,indust

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-31-2012

Subject : Property

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1966, - Sections 9-K(3), 9-N, 35-A, 11(2)(c), 4(a), 9-B(5)

the safety of the river, its course and river bed, and exercises power under the A.P. (Andhra Area) River Conservancy Act, 1884; he has jurisdiction over both the left and right banks of the Krishna river, and at the KC … all of them located in Gunutr District for transportation of the sand quarried at reach No.8, Amaravati. 24. Section 9-I(2) requires the successful tenderer/bidder to execute a lease deed with the Assistant Director of Mines and Geology

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 02 2008

Alluri Narayana Murthy Raju Vs. Dist. Collector and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-02-2008

Subject : Contract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 32 and 56; Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Rivers Conservancy Act, 1884; Interest Act, 1978 - Sections 3 and 3(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 144; Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Auction of Sand in the Water Courses Vesting in Gram Panchayat) Rules, 2000 - Rules 5, 7, 8, 11 to 18, 19 and 26

Reported in : AIR2008AP264; 2008(6)ALD103

respondent No. 2 on 23.12.2000 calling for tenders for auctioning the right to quarry the sand in Gostani river in Maddi Gram Panchayat, Padmanabham Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, the petitioner made his application by paying necessary E.M.D. Respondent … of the auction or is lifting the sand against the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Rivers Conservancy Act, 1884.18. Sections 32 and 56 of the Act, which are very material for the present purpose, read as … Inspector of Police, Bheemunipatnam, respondent No. 5 initiated proceedings dated 24.12.2001 under Section 144, Cr.P.C. Despite the said measures, the villagers did not permit the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 31 1950

The State of Madras Represented by the Collector of East Godavari at K ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-31-1950

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Madras River Conservancy Act, 1884 - Sections 16 and 25; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 80 - Order 1, Rule 10; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 117

Reported in : AIR1952Mad510; (1951)IMLJ454

given two months time to pay the costs. Civil - compensation - Sections 16 and 25 of Madras River Conservancy Act, 1884, Section 117 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and Section 80 and Order 1 Rule 10 of Code of … the lessee in respect of the suit lands. These four suits are O. S. Nos. 34 of 1941, 29 of 1943, 14 of 1944 & 61 of 1944. 10 those suite the plffs. had alleged that the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 12 1962

State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Koneru Suryanarayana and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-12-1962

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 1; Madras Rivers Conservancy Act, 1884 - Sections 3, 7, 11, 12 and 13

Reported in : AIR1963AP94

claiming the accretions as theirs, though in that case the nanal grass was planted by the Government for river conservancy. I do not know whether this case is strictly in point, for the reason that it was found … of the Government, and, is therefore, in contravention of Sections 11, 12 and 13 of the Madras Rivers Conservancy Act (Act VI of 1884). Accordingly it is contended that the planting of nanal grass constitutes an illegal operation, … suit was brought by Koneru Survanarayana and Vemulapalli Subbayya (respondents 1 and 2 in the present appeal) on behalf of all the owners of the … the reformation in situ. These formations of accretions are dealt with in Section 4 of the Bengal Regulation XI of 1825. We are in this

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 27 1919

The Secretary of State for India in Council Vs. Sri Rajah Bommadevara ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-27-1919

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 58Ind.Cas.689

year, the villages have been held on ordinary ryotwary, tenure.19. In 1894 operations were begun under the Rivers Conservancy Act (Mad. Act VI of 1884) with the object of confining the course of the river Kistna within defined … would fall to be considered only if I had decided the questions 2 to 4 against the plaintiffs. The questions I propose to consider are,--(1) … land really belonged to B is removed. (The Limitation Act relieves against ignorance only in case s under sections 5, 14 and 18). It has been held that even ignorance of his dispossession will not save the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 19 1928

The Secretary of State for India in Council Represented by the Collect ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-19-1928

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 118Ind.Cas.273

mesne profits. The Government was in possession of the Kistna River under the provisions of Act VI of 1884. Section 11 of the Act runs as follows:After such surveys shall have been completed and approved and the notification … having asked for permission and no permission having been refused is not entitled to compensation under the Rivers Conservancy Act and it cannot be said that Government has asserted a hostile title against him or that the decision … the decree of the Additional Subordinate Judge of Bezwada in O.S. No. 22 of 1923 on his file. This was a suit by the zemindar

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 19 1928

Secy. of State Vs. (Bommadevara) Satyanarayana Varaprasada Rao Bahadur ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-19-1928

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1929Mad520

mesne profits. The Government was in possession of the Kistna river under the provisions of Act 6 of 1884. Section 11 of the Act runs as follows:After such surveys shall have been completed and approved and the notification … having asked for permission and no permission having been refu6ed is not entitled to compensation under the Rivers Conservancy Act and it cannot be said that Government has asserted a hostile title against him or that the decision … appeals against the decree of the Additional Sub-Judge of Bezwada in O.S. 22 of 1923 on his file. This was a suit by the Zamindar

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 08 1925

Prafulla Kamini Roy Vs. Bhabani Nath Roy

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-08-1925

Subject : Family

Reported in : (1925)ILR52Cal1018

enactment pro tanto must be deemed to have been repealed by the later one: The Conservators of the River Thames v. Hall (1868) L. R. 3 C. P. 415 and Emperor v. Probhat Chandra Barua (1924) I. … of Section 98, Civil Procedure Code, for I am satisfied that since 1884 when the Full Bench delivered judgment in the case of Gossami Sri … on the third part of Section 652 of the Codes of 1877 and 1882. which was added by Section 2 of the Civil Procedure Code Amendment Act (XII of 1895), and which was re-enacted in Section 12 of … But a reversionary heir thus appealing to the Court truly for the conservation and just administration of the property does so in a representative capacity

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial