Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: river conservancy act 1884 section 18 · Page 1 of about 12 results (0.045 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 02 2008

Alluri Narayana Murthy Raju Vs. Dist. Collector and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-02-2008

Subject : Contract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 32 and 56; Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Rivers Conservancy Act, 1884; Interest Act, 1978 - Sections 3 and 3(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 144; Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Auction of Sand in the Water Courses Vesting in Gram Panchayat) Rules, 2000 - Rules 5, 7, 8, 11 to 18, 19 and 26

Reported in : AIR2008AP264; 2008(6)ALD103

respondent No. 2 on 23.12.2000 calling for tenders for auctioning the right to quarry the sand in Gostani river in Maddi Gram Panchayat, Padmanabham Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, the petitioner made his application by paying necessary E.M.D. Respondent … of the auction or is lifting the sand against the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Rivers Conservancy Act, 1884.18. Sections 32 and 56 of the Act, which are very material for the present purpose, read as … Inspector of Police, Bheemunipatnam, respondent No. 5 initiated proceedings dated 24.12.2001 under Section 144, Cr.P.C. Despite the said measures, the villagers did not permit the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 27 1919

The Secretary of State for India in Council Vs. Sri Rajah Bommadevara ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-27-1919

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 58Ind.Cas.689

year, the villages have been held on ordinary ryotwary, tenure.19. In 1894 operations were begun under the Rivers Conservancy Act (Mad. Act VI of 1884) with the object of confining the course of the river Kistna within defined … land really belonged to B is removed. (The Limitation Act relieves against ignorance only in case s under sections 5, 14 and 18). It has been held that even ignorance of his dispossession will not save the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 12 1904

Annakumaru Pillai Vs. Muthupayal and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-12-1904

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1904)14MLJ248

in the bed from which the prisoner had removed them and which was situated in a tidal navigable river.14. Apart from any statute, in State v. Taylor 72 Am. Deo. 347 referred to above, dishonest removal of … have always been taken to be the exclusive property of the sovereign, by whom, consequently, they have been conserved; and the fishery operations connected therewith have always been carried on under state control and have formed a … for determination in the present case are.1. (a). Whether live chanks not actually seized but remaining free in their natural habitat in the bed of … average revenue during the 25 years from 1876-77 to 1902-03 (not reckoning 1884-85 in which for some reason not apparent there was no fishery) derived … property? (c). Is 'possession' within the meaning of Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code predicablc in … so far as appears, having been enacted in 1811.5. The chanks are not fixed to the localities

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 05 1922

Wyoming Vs. Colorado

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-05-1922

Subject : Land Acquisition

determining this controversy, in which Wyoming seeks to prevent diversion of water from the headwaters of the Laramie River in Colorado for use in irrigating Colorado lands, to the detriment of prior irrigation appropriations made from the … Page 259 U. S. 473 of flow such as extreme flow of 1884 would be impractical to the extent that it exceeded the ordinary high … Colo. 61; Oppenlander v. Left Hand Ditch Co., 18 Colo. 142; Wyatt v. Larimer & Weld Irrigation … appropriation lays upon each state a duty to exercise her right reasonably and in a manner calculated to conserve the common supply. P. 259 U. S. 484 . 10. The evidence establishes: (a) The average yearly flow … part in Wyoming. When this suit was brought, the two corporate defendants, acting under the authority and permission of Colorado, were proceeding to divert in … 262, § 9, 14 Stat. 251, contained a section providing: "Whenever, by priority of possession, rights to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 31 1949

Hynes Vs. Grimes Packing Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : May-31-1949

Subject : Land Acquisition

337 U. S. 94 spoken of in Order No. 128, establishing the reservation is situated on the Karluk River, long recognized as one of the most important salmon spawning streams of Alaska. The natives live at its … Indians or Eskimos by section 8 of the Act of May 17, 1884 (23 Stat. 26), or by section 14 or section 15 of the … Reservation cannot be predicated on the language of the Act of June 18, 1934, which must be construed as effective only where there has been … P. 337 U. S. 118 . (b) The White Act, the purpose of which was to protect and conserve the fisheries of Alaska on a nonmonopolistic basis, Page 337 U. S. 88 authorizes the establishment of preserves

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 24 2006

State of Tamil Nadu and anr. Vs. P. Krishnamurthy and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-24-2006

Subject : EnvironmentCivil

Acts : Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 - Sections 4, 4A, 4A(1), 4A(2), 4A(3), 15, 17, 17A and 24A; Madras River Conservancy Act, 1884; Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) (Amendment) Act, 1986; Tamil Nadu Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1959 - Rules 1(3), 2(6), 8, 8A, 8C, 8(8), 8(11), 15, 36(1), 36(5) and 38A; Constitution of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC1622; JT2006(4)SC167; (2006)3MLJ313(SC); 2006(3)SCALE460; (2006)4SCC517

15 provides for absolute prohibition or regulation of quarrying or removal of sand from riverbeds to which Madras River Conservancy Act, 1884 has been extended and for regulating the quarrying or removal of sand from beds of river in charge … or removal of sand from riverbeds to which Madras River Conservancy Act, 1884 has been extended and for regulating the quarrying or removal of sand … minor minerals by making appropriate rules, in view of the power delegated to it by the Parliament under Section 15 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (for short the 'Act'). The power to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 18 1931

Arizona Vs. California

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : May-18-1931

Subject : Land Acquisition

1931 283 U.S. 423 Syllabus 1. The United States has power to construct a dam across a navigable river for the purpose of improving navigation, and need not first obtain approval of its plans by the state … and preventing floods in this interstate river; or as a means of conserving and apportioning its waters among the states equitably entitled thereto, or for … Arizona, (1930), vol. i, pp. 216-36. By the Act of July 5, 1884, c. 229, 23 Stat. 133, 144, Congress appropriated $25,000 for the improvement … the state or limit in any way the exercise of her legal right to appropriate water. Id. (3) Section 18 of the Act declares that nothing in it "shall be construed as interfering with such rights as the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 19 1975

Antoine Vs. Washington

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Feb-19-1975

Subject : Land Acquisition

] The original reservation was over 3 million acres "bounded on the east and south by the Columbia River, on the west by the Okanagan River, and on the north by the British possessions." Exec.Order of July … of commercial fishing [and hunting], and the like may be regulated by the State in the interest of conservation, provided the regulation meets appropriate standards and does not discriminate against the Indians." The "appropriate standards" requirement means … State in 1889, 26 Stat. 1552, and, the next year, by the Act of Aug.19, 1890, 26 Stat. 355, Congress created the Commission that negotiated … "Any person who hunts . . . deer in violation of this section is guilty of a gross misdemeanor. . . ." Section 77.16.030 provides … to the Government by an Agreement made in 1891, later ratified and implemented by Congress, one of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 18 1927

Morris Vs. Duby

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Apr-18-1927

Subject : Land Acquisition

plaintiffs below, the appellants here, owned and operated for hire, under proper license, motor trucks on the Columbia River Highway in Oregon from the east boundary of Multnomah County to the west limits of the City of … nor the earlier post road acts, Rev.Stat. § 3964; Act March 1, 1884, c. 9, 23 Stat. 3, do that." The mere fact that a … 372. Argued October 29, 1926 * Decided April 18, 1927 274 U.S. 135 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT … no provision, express or implied, by which there is withheld from the state its ordinary police power to conserve the highways in the interest of the public and to prescribe such reasonable regulations for their use as … to protect highways from damage by vehicles is not affected by the Acts of Congress providing for national and state cooperation in the construction of … damage of any highway or highways or any sections thereof to reduce the maximum weights and speeds

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

1987

iowa Mut. Ins. Co. Vs. Laplante

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-01-1987

Subject : Land Acquisition

as a jurisdictional prerequisite. In this respect, the rule is analogous to principles of abstention articulated in Colorado River Water Conservation Dist. v. United States, 424 U. S. 800 (1976): even where there is concurrent jurisdiction in … jurisdictional prerequisite. In this respect, the rule is analogous to principles of abstention articulated in Colorado River Water Conservation Dist. v. United States, 424 U. S. 800 (1976): even where there is concurrent jurisdiction in both the … protects non-Indians against unfair treatment in tribal courts. Pp. 480 U. S. 18 -19. 2. Although a final determination of jurisdiction by the Blackfeet Tribal … Without seeking review by the Tribal Court of Appeals, petitioner brought an action in Federal District Court, alleging diversity of citizenship as the basis for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial