Advanced Search Results

Alluri Narayana Murthy Raju Vs. Dist. Collector and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Contract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 32 and 56; Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Rivers Conservancy Act, 1884; Interest Act, 1978 - Sections 3 and 3(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 144; Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Auction of Sand in the Water Courses Vesting in Gram Panchayat) Rules, 2000 - Rules 5, 7, 8, 11 to 18, 19 and 26

Reported in : AIR2008AP264; 2008(6)ALD103

respondent No. 2 on 23.12.2000 calling for tenders for auctioning the right to quarry the sand in Gostani river in Maddi Gram Panchayat, Padmanabham Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, the petitioner made his application by paying necessary E.M.D. Respondent … of the auction or is lifting the sand against the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Rivers Conservancy Act, 1884.18. Sections 32 and 56 of the Act, which are very material for the present purpose, read as … Inspector of Police, Bheemunipatnam, respondent No. 5 initiated proceedings dated 24.12.2001 under Section 144, Cr.P.C. Despite the said measures, the villagers did not permit the … of Police, Bheemunipatnam, respondent No. 5 initiated proceedings dated 24.12.2001 under Section 144, Cr.P.C. Despite the said measures, the villagers did not permit the petitioner

The State of Madras Represented by the Collector of East Godavari at K ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Madras River Conservancy Act, 1884 - Sections 16 and 25; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 80 - Order 1, Rule 10; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 117

Reported in : AIR1952Mad510; (1951)IMLJ454

given two months time to pay the costs. Civil - compensation - Sections 16 and 25 of Madras River Conservancy Act, 1884, Section 117 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and Section 80 and Order 1 Rule 10 of Code of … respect of the suit lands. These four suits are O. S. Nos. 34 of 1941, 29 of 1943, 14 of 1944 & 61 of 1944. 10 those suite the plffs. had alleged that the two blocks of

The Secretary of State for India in Council Vs. Sri Rajah Bommadevara ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 58Ind.Cas.689

year, the villages have been held on ordinary ryotwary, tenure.19. In 1894 operations were begun under the Rivers Conservancy Act (Mad. Act VI of 1884) with the object of confining the course of the river Kistna within defined … land really belonged to B is removed. (The Limitation Act relieves against ignorance only in case s under sections 5, 14 and 18). It has been held that even ignorance of his dispossession will not save the

State of Tamil Nadu and anr. Vs. P. Krishnamurthy and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : EnvironmentCivil

Acts : Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 - Sections 4, 4A, 4A(1), 4A(2), 4A(3), 15, 17, 17A and 24A; Madras River Conservancy Act, 1884; Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) (Amendment) Act, 1986; Tamil Nadu Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1959 - Rules 1(3), 2(6), 8, 8A, 8C, 8(8), 8(11), 15, 36(1), 36(5) and 38A; Constitution of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC1622; JT2006(4)SC167; (2006)3MLJ313(SC); 2006(3)SCALE460; (2006)4SCC517

15 provides for absolute prohibition or regulation of quarrying or removal of sand from riverbeds to which Madras River Conservancy Act, 1884 has been extended and for regulating the quarrying or removal of sand from beds of river in charge … minor minerals by making appropriate rules, in view of the power delegated to it by the Parliament under Section 15 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (for short the 'Act'). The power to

Haveliram Shetty Vs. Maharaja of Morvi

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : AIR1945Bom88; (1944)46BOMLR877

within certain limits, was vested in those undertakers for the purposes of conservation and improvement, by several special Acts. The Ouse Improvement Act, 1884, incorporated … vested in those undertakers for the purposes of conservation and improvement, by several special Acts. The Ouse Improvement Act, 1884, incorporated some of the powers and provisions of the Harbours, Docks, and Piers Clauses Act, 1847, including Section … and I will not pursue this matter further.13. The question we have to determine arises by virtue of Section 14 of the Defence of India Act, which lays upon the Central Government's power to legislate by rule, and … A.C. 615. In that case the undertakers of the navigation of the riversAirs and Calder by its secretary were given statutory rights to sue; on

Hynes Vs. Grimes Packing Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

Indians or Eskimos by section 8 of the Act of May 17, 1884 (23 Stat. 26), or by section 14 or section 15 of the Act of March 3, 1891 (26 Stat. 1101), or which has been heretofore … 337 U. S. 94 spoken of in Order No. 128, establishing the reservation is situated on the Karluk River, long recognized as one of the most important salmon spawning streams of Alaska. The natives live at its … (b) The White Act, the purpose of which was to protect and conserve the fisheries of Alaska on a nonmonopolistic basis, Page 337 U. S.

State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Koneru Suryanarayana and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 1; Madras Rivers Conservancy Act, 1884 - Sections 3, 7, 11, 12 and 13

Reported in : AIR1963AP94

claiming the accretions as theirs, though in that case the nanal grass was planted by the Government for river conservancy. I do not know whether this case is strictly in point, for the reason that it was found … of the Government, and, is therefore, in contravention of Sections 11, 12 and 13 of the Madras Rivers Conservancy Act (Act VI of 1884). Accordingly it is contended that the planting of nanal grass constitutes an illegal operation, … having been relinquished by the plaintiffs was surveyed as R. S. No. 14 and designated as river poramboke. The 1st defendant-Government states that the extent … the reformation in situ. These formations of accretions are dealt with in Section 4 of the Bengal Regulation XI of 1825. We are in this

Arizona Vs. California

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

1931 283 U.S. 423 Syllabus 1. The United States has power to construct a dam across a navigable river for the purpose of improving navigation, and need not first obtain approval of its plans by the state … specified purpose of regulating the flow and preventing floods in this interstate river; or as a means of conserving and apportioning its waters among the states equitably entitled thereto, or for the purpose of performing international obligations. … Arizona, (1930), vol. i, pp. 216-36. By the Act of July 5, 1884, c. 229, 23 Stat. 133, 144, Congress appropriated $25,000 for the improvement … it. P. 283 U. S. 454 . 5. The Boulder Canyon Project Act, December 21, 1928, authorizes the Secretary of the Interior at the expense … her legal right to appropriate water. Id. (3) Section 18 of the Act declares that nothing in … Hamilton v. Kentucky Distilleries Co., 251 U. S. 146 , 251 U. S. 161 ; Smith v.

Antoine Vs. Washington

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

] The original reservation was over 3 million acres "bounded on the east and south by the Columbia River, on the west by the Okanagan River, and on the north by the British possessions." Exec.Order of July … settlement. . . ." The second statute came 14 years later, the Act of June 21, 1906, … of commercial fishing [and hunting], and the like may be regulated by the State in the interest of conservation, provided the regulation meets appropriate standards and does not discriminate against the Indians." The "appropriate standards" requirement means … State in 1889, 26 Stat. 1552, and, the next year, by the Act of Aug.19, 1890, 26 Stat. 355, Congress created the Commission that negotiated … "Any person who hunts . . . deer in violation of this section is guilty of a gross misdemeanor. . . ." Section 77.16.030 provides

Liverpool and London S.P. and I Asson. Ltd. Vs. M.V. Sea Success I and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 44A, 104 and 117 - Order 7, Rules 11, 11A and 14 - Order 37 - Order 43, Rule 1 - Order 49, Rule 3; Admiralty Courts Act, 1861 - Sections 1, 1(4), 5 and 6 ;Admiralty Courts Act, 1840; Supreme Court of Judicature (Consolidation) Act, 1925 - Sections 22 and 22(1); Administration of Justice Act, 1956 - Sections 20(2) and 47(2); Inland Vessels Act, 1917; Merchant Shipping Act, 1956; Multimodal Transportation of Goods Act, 1993 - Sections 7 and 7(1); Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act, 1890 - Sections 2; Colonial Courts of Admiralty (India) Act, 1891 - Sections 2; Merchant Shipping Acts, 1894 to 1923; Supreme Court of Judicature Act, 1873; Administration of Justice Act, 1920; Admiralty Jurisdiction Regulation Act, 1983; Merchant Shipping (Oil) Polluti

Reported in : JT2003(9)SC218; 2003(10)SCALE1; (2004)9SCC512; MANU/SC/0951/2003

8 P.D. 151, The Andre Theodore 10 Aspinall 94, Stokes v. The Conference 1887 (8) NSWR 10, The River Rima 1988 2 L Rep 193, a South African Court decision in The Emerald Transporter 1985 2 SALR … that the averments made in paragraphs 1 and 14 of the plaint inter alia to the effect … and cargo vessels. Barges are excluded, as are public vessels unless 'engaged in commerce'.The Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC) have proposed draft regulations to implement the financial responsibility requirements. ADEC predicts that their regulations will not … ground that the averments contained therein do not disclose a cause of action as the claim of unpaid insurance premium was not a 'necessary' within … of unpaid insurance premium was not a 'necessary' within the meaning of Section 5 of the Admiralty Courts Act, 1861. A learned Single Judge of