Advanced Search Results

The State of Madras Represented by the Collector of East Godavari at K ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Madras River Conservancy Act, 1884 - Sections 16 and 25; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 80 - Order 1, Rule 10; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 117

Reported in : AIR1952Mad510; (1951)IMLJ454

given two months time to pay the costs. Civil - compensation - Sections 16 and 25 of Madras River Conservancy Act, 1884, Section 117 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and Section 80 and Order 1 Rule 10 of Code of

Mohd. MohsinuddIn Vs. the Government of A.P., Rep. by Its Prin

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

the safety of the river, its course and river bed, and exercises power under the A.P. (Andhra Area) River Conservancy Act, 1884; he has jurisdiction over both the left and right banks of the Krishna river, and at the KC … ramps all of them located in Gunutr District for transportation of the sand quarried at reach No.8, Amaravati.24. Section 9-I(2) requires the successful tenderer/bidder to execute a lease deed with the Assistant Director of Mines and Geology … THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITON NOs.25583 of 2010, 1708, 17915, 17922 AND 1793.OF 201.31-01-2012 V. Narasimha Rao The Government of Andhra

V. Narasimha Rao Vs. the Government of Andhra Pradesh,indust

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1966, - Sections 9-K(3), 9-N, 35-A, 11(2)(c), 4(a), 9-B(5)

the safety of the river, its course and river bed, and exercises power under the A.P. (Andhra Area) River Conservancy Act, 1884; he has jurisdiction over both the left and right banks of the Krishna river, and at the KC … COMMON ORDER: 1. These five Writ Petitions relate to the use of additional ramps, by … all of them located in Gunutr District for transportation of the sand quarried at reach No.8, Amaravati. 24. Section 9-I(2) requires the successful tenderer/bidder to execute a lease deed with the Assistant Director of Mines and Geology

Alluri Narayana Murthy Raju Vs. Dist. Collector and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Contract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 32 and 56; Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Rivers Conservancy Act, 1884; Interest Act, 1978 - Sections 3 and 3(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 144; Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Auction of Sand in the Water Courses Vesting in Gram Panchayat) Rules, 2000 - Rules 5, 7, 8, 11 to 18, 19 and 26

Reported in : AIR2008AP264; 2008(6)ALD103

respondent No. 2 on 23.12.2000 calling for tenders for auctioning the right to quarry the sand in Gostani river in Maddi Gram Panchayat, Padmanabham Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, the petitioner made his application by paying necessary E.M.D. Respondent … of the auction or is lifting the sand against the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Rivers Conservancy Act, 1884.18. Sections 32 and 56 of the Act, which are very material for the present purpose, read as … Inspector of Police, Bheemunipatnam, respondent No. 5 initiated proceedings dated 24.12.2001 under Section 144, Cr.P.C. Despite the said measures, the villagers did not permit the … his application by paying necessary E.M.D. Respondent No. 2 conducted auction on 10.4.2000 and the petitioner emerged as the highest bidder. The contract was awarded

State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Koneru Suryanarayana and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 1; Madras Rivers Conservancy Act, 1884 - Sections 3, 7, 11, 12 and 13

Reported in : AIR1963AP94

claiming the accretions as theirs, though in that case the nanal grass was planted by the Government for river conservancy. I do not know whether this case is strictly in point, for the reason that it was found … of the Government, and, is therefore, in contravention of Sections 11, 12 and 13 of the Madras Rivers Conservancy Act (Act VI of 1884). Accordingly it is contended that the planting of nanal grass constitutes an illegal operation, … Seshachelapathi, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree in O. S. … the reformation in situ. These formations of accretions are dealt with in Section 4 of the Bengal Regulation XI of 1825. We are in this

State of Tamil Nadu and anr. Vs. P. Krishnamurthy and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : EnvironmentCivil

Acts : Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 - Sections 4, 4A, 4A(1), 4A(2), 4A(3), 15, 17, 17A and 24A; Madras River Conservancy Act, 1884; Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) (Amendment) Act, 1986; Tamil Nadu Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1959 - Rules 1(3), 2(6), 8, 8A, 8C, 8(8), 8(11), 15, 36(1), 36(5) and 38A; Constitution of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC1622; JT2006(4)SC167; (2006)3MLJ313(SC); 2006(3)SCALE460; (2006)4SCC517

15 provides for absolute prohibition or regulation of quarrying or removal of sand from riverbeds to which Madras River Conservancy Act, 1884 has been extended and for regulating the quarrying or removal of sand from beds of river in charge … minor minerals by making appropriate rules, in view of the power delegated to it by the Parliament under Section 15 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (for short the 'Act'). The power to … R.V. Raveendran, J.1. These appeals by special leave against the judgment dated 11.5.2004 of a Division Bench of the High Court of Madras in W.A.

The Secretary of State for India in Council Represented by the Collect ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 118Ind.Cas.273

mesne profits. The Government was in possession of the Kistna River under the provisions of Act VI of 1884. Section 11 of the Act runs as follows:After such surveys shall have been completed and approved and the notification … having asked for permission and no permission having been refused is not entitled to compensation under the Rivers Conservancy Act and it cannot be said that Government has asserted a hostile title against him or that the decision … of the Additional Subordinate Judge of Bezwada in O.S. No. 22 of 1923 on his file. This was a suit by the zemindar of South

Hynes Vs. Grimes Packing Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

337 U. S. 94 spoken of in Order No. 128, establishing the reservation is situated on the Karluk River, long recognized as one of the most important salmon spawning streams of Alaska. The natives live at its … Indians or Eskimos by section 8 of the Act of May 17, 1884 (23 Stat. 26), or by section 14 or section 15 of the … of this statute also is important, it is set out here, [ Footnote 4 ] 44 Stat. 752: "SECTION 1. That, for the purpose of protecting and conserving the fisheries of the United States in all waters of … (b) The White Act, the purpose of which was to protect and conserve the fisheries of Alaska on a nonmonopolistic basis, Page 337 U. S.

The Secretary of State for India in Council Vs. Sri Rajah Bommadevara ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 58Ind.Cas.689

year, the villages have been held on ordinary ryotwary, tenure.19. In 1894 operations were begun under the Rivers Conservancy Act (Mad. Act VI of 1884) with the object of confining the course of the river Kistna within defined … to the Government by the Rivers Conservancy, Madras, Act, No. VI of 1884), the reclamations having taken place between 1897 and 1912.3. The plaintiff's contention … land really belonged to B is removed. (The Limitation Act relieves against ignorance only in case s under sections 5, 14 and 18). It has been held that even ignorance of his dispossession will not save the

Secy. of State Vs. (Bommadevara) Satyanarayana Varaprasada Rao Bahadur ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1929Mad520

mesne profits. The Government was in possession of the Kistna river under the provisions of Act 6 of 1884. Section 11 of the Act runs as follows:After such surveys shall have been completed and approved and the notification … having asked for permission and no permission having been refu6ed is not entitled to compensation under the Rivers Conservancy Act and it cannot be said that Government has asserted a hostile title against him or that the decision … the decree of the Additional Sub-Judge of Bezwada in O.S. 22 of 1923 on his file. This was a suit by the Zamindar of South