Advanced Search Results

State of Tamil Nadu and anr. Vs. P. Krishnamurthy and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : EnvironmentCivil

Acts : Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 - Sections 4, 4A, 4A(1), 4A(2), 4A(3), 15, 17, 17A and 24A; Madras River Conservancy Act, 1884; Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) (Amendment) Act, 1986; Tamil Nadu Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1959 - Rules 1(3), 2(6), 8, 8A, 8C, 8(8), 8(11), 15, 36(1), 36(5) and 38A; Constitution of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC1622; JT2006(4)SC167; (2006)3MLJ313(SC); 2006(3)SCALE460; (2006)4SCC517

15 provides for absolute prohibition or regulation of quarrying or removal of sand from riverbeds to which Madras River Conservancy Act, 1884 has been extended and for regulating the quarrying or removal of sand from beds of river in charge … in the State. It is in this background, Rule 38A came to be inserted in the Rules by Notification dated 1.10.2003 with effect from 2.10.2003.4. Prior to insertion of the said Rule, the State Government was granting

Alluri Narayana Murthy Raju Vs. Dist. Collector and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Contract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 32 and 56; Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Rivers Conservancy Act, 1884; Interest Act, 1978 - Sections 3 and 3(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 144; Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Auction of Sand in the Water Courses Vesting in Gram Panchayat) Rules, 2000 - Rules 5, 7, 8, 11 to 18, 19 and 26

Reported in : AIR2008AP264; 2008(6)ALD103

respondent No. 2 on 23.12.2000 calling for tenders for auctioning the right to quarry the sand in Gostani river in Maddi Gram Panchayat, Padmanabham Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, the petitioner made his application by paying necessary E.M.D. Respondent … of the auction or is lifting the sand against the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Rivers Conservancy Act, 1884.18. Sections 32 and 56 of the Act, which are very material for the present purpose, read as … The facts of the case are stated as under:In pursuance of the notification issued by respondent No. 2 on 23.12.2000 calling for tenders for auctioning … his application by paying necessary E.M.D. Respondent No. 2 conducted auction on 10.4.2000 and the petitioner emerged as the highest bidder. The contract was awarded

The Secretary of State for India in Council Represented by the Collect ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 118Ind.Cas.273

: 11 L.W. 256 : 27 M.L.T. 147.]2. From 1894 the Government was in possession of the Kistna River for conservancy purposes and the suit lankas were formed in consequence of the operations of Government. On 12th … possession of the Kistna River under the provisions of Act VI of 1884. Section 11 of the Act runs as follows:After such surveys shall have … having asked for permission and no permission having been refused is not entitled to compensation under the Rivers Conservancy Act and it cannot be said that Government has asserted a hostile title against him or that the decision … as follows:After such surveys shall have been completed and approved and the notification as provided by this Act made by the Governor-in-Council, land within the … Judge of Bezwada in O.S. No. 22 of 1923 on his file. This was a suit by

Sri Kanaka Durga Agnikula Kshatriya Sand Quarry, Boatsmen and Fisherme ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : River Conservancy Act, 1884; Constitution of India - Article 226; Andhra Pradesh Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1966 - Rules 9B to 9X and 25

Reported in : 2006(1)ALD495; 2006(2)ALT399

is competent to club or subdivide reaches in consultation with River Conservator with regard to reaches falling under River Conservancy Act, 1884. Rule 9-B(2)(b) of the Rules is to the effect that it shall be competent to the DLC to … notice provides for distance range in the village where a ramp can be provided. As seen from the notification, the distance range where the ramp can be provided for the lessee is between two points is minimum … conditions, the petitioner was required to pay the bid amount of Rs. 1,57,500/- (after allowing ten per cent concession as it is a Boatsmen Society)

Mohd. MohsinuddIn Vs. the Government of A.P., Rep. by Its Prin

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

the safety of the river, its course and river bed, and exercises power under the A.P. (Andhra Area) River Conservancy Act, 1884; he has jurisdiction over both the left and right banks of the Krishna river, and at the KC … is situated on the right flood bank of the Krishna River in Guntur District of Andhra Pradesh. A notification dated 05.03.2010 was issued for auction of leasehold rights to conduct sand quarry operations in respect of Amaravathi … THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITON NOs.25583 of 2010, 1708, 17915, 17922 AND 1793.OF 201.31-01-2012 V. Narasimha Rao The Government of Andhra

V. Narasimha Rao Vs. the Government of Andhra Pradesh,indust

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1966, - Sections 9-K(3), 9-N, 35-A, 11(2)(c), 4(a), 9-B(5)

the safety of the river, its course and river bed, and exercises power under the A.P. (Andhra Area) River Conservancy Act, 1884; he has jurisdiction over both the left and right banks of the Krishna river, and at the KC … is situated on the right flood bank of the Krishna River in Guntur District of Andhra Pradesh. A notification dated 05.03.2010 was issued for auction of leasehold rights to conduct sand quarry operations in respect of Amaravathi … COMMON ORDER: 1. These five Writ Petitions relate to the use of additional ramps, by

State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Koneru Suryanarayana and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 1; Madras Rivers Conservancy Act, 1884 - Sections 3, 7, 11, 12 and 13

Reported in : AIR1963AP94

claiming the accretions as theirs, though in that case the nanal grass was planted by the Government for river conservancy. I do not know whether this case is strictly in point, for the reason that it was found … of the Government, and, is therefore, in contravention of Sections 11, 12 and 13 of the Madras Rivers Conservancy Act (Act VI of 1884). Accordingly it is contended that the planting of nanal grass constitutes an illegal operation, … by Mr. Sambasivarao, depends upon the survey under Section 3 and the notification under Section 7 of the Act. Whether the river was so surveyed … Seshachelapathi, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree in O. S.

Secy. of State Vs. (Bommadevara) Satyanarayana Varaprasada Rao Bahadur ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1929Mad520

Venkata Narasimha Naidu [1920] 11 M.L.W. 256 .2. From 1894 the Government was in possession of the Kistna river for conservancy purposes and the suit lands were formed in consequence of the operations of Government. On 12th … possession of the Kistna river under the provisions of Act 6 of 1884. Section 11 of the Act runs as follows:After such surveys shall have … having asked for permission and no permission having been refu6ed is not entitled to compensation under the Rivers Conservancy Act and it cannot be said that Government has asserted a hostile title against him or that the decision … as follows:After such surveys shall have been completed and approved and the notification as provided by this Act made by the Governor-in-Council, land within the … Additional Sub-Judge of Bezwada in O.S. 22 of 1923 on his file. This was a suit by