Advanced Search Results

In the Matter of : Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ConstitutionCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 32, 38, 39, 73, 131, 137, 143, 162, 213, 245, 246, 248, 262, 371D and 374; Inter-state Water Disputes Act, 1956 - Sections 3, 5, 6, 11 and 152A; River Boards Act, 1956 - Sections 2 and 4; Karnataka Cauvery Basin Irrigation Protection Ordinance, 1991 - Sections 1 and 7; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 9(1) and 11; Customs Act, 1962; Life Insurance Corporation (Modification of Settlement) Act, 1976; Delhi Laws Act, 1912; Ajmer-Merwara (Extension of Laws) Act, 1947; Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1952 - Sections 7(1)

Reported in : AIR1992SC522; JT1991(4)SC361; 1991(2)SCALE1049; [1991]Supp2SCR497

as follows: Karnataka-177 TMC, Tamil Nadu including Pondicherry-489 TMC and Kerala-5 TMC.6. In 1956 the Parliament enacted the River Boards Act, 1956 for the purpose of regulation and development of inter-State rivers and river valleys and also the Inter-State Water … to move the Supreme Court under Article 131 of the Constitution notwithstanding the provisions of Article 262 and Section 11 of the Act. According to the learned Counsel since the scope of Article 262 read with the scheme

State of Karnataka Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : EnvironmentConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 131, 256 and 262(1); Rivers Boards Act, 1956; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 15; Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956 - Sections 2(C), 3, 4, 5(2), 6 and 11; States Reorganisation Act, 1956

Reported in : AIR2001SC1560; JT2000(6)SC1; 1999(4)SCALE332; (2000)9SCC572

List II Entry 17, List I, Entry 56, and Statutes like Inter-State Water Disputes Act, 1956 and Rivers Boards Act, 1956.187. The controversy, in the present proceedings, amongst the States of Maharashtra, Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh is with … State would be a fresh water dispute and as such would be barred under Article 262 read with Section 11 of the Inter-State Water Disputes Act, 1956. The question of submergence of land pursuant to the user of … in any water year more than the quantity of water of the river Krishna specified hereunder:(i) as from the water-year commencing on the 1st June

Steel Authority of India Ltd. Vs. State of Orissa and anr.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Commercial

Reported in : AIR2009Ori124; 107(2009)CLT430

the Petitioner Company for its use is an inter-State river and the said river was covered by River Board Act, 1956 and the State was denuded of its legislative power.9. In the light of the contention as … Petitioner Company for its use is an inter-State river and the said river was covered by River Board Act, 1956 and the State was denuded of its legislative power.9. In the light of the contention as noted hereinabove, … Petition. In Indian Contract Act, 1872 the term 'coercion' has defined under Section 15 and in the event a contract has been obtained by coercion, … That the mining lease relating to Bolani Ores Mines was executed on 11.4.1960 between the Governor of Orissa and the erstwhile Bolani Ores Limited, for

In Re : Networking of Rivers

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 262

the case of the petitioner that the Inter-State Water Disputes Act, 1956 (for short `the Act') and the River Boards Act, 1956 were enacted by the Parliament under Article 262 read with Entry 56 of List-I of the Seventh Schedule … expression `may' in the Constitution does not indicate a clear legislative intent, thus, it may be possible that Section 11 of the Act could refer only to such disputes as are already referred to a - Tribunal and

D.M. Singhvi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80 - Order 7, Rule 11; Punjab Re-organisation Act, 1966 - Sections 78, 78(1), 79, 79(1) and 80; Punjab and Haryana vide Reorganisation Act; Constitution of India - Articles 131, 143, 226, 245, 246, 262, 262(2), 263 and 298; Inter state River Water Disputes Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 3, 5(1), 7 and 11; Punjab Termination of Agreements Act 2004 - Sections 3 and 5;

Reported in : AIR2005Raj280; RLW2005(2)Raj1488; 2005(3)WLC45

jurisdiction of the court. The water disputes barred under Section 11 of the Inter state River Water Disputes Act, 1956 (for short 'Act of 1956') read with Article 263 of the Constitution. The petitioner seeks an order/direction to … its functions and such amounts shall be apportioned among the successor Slates, the Stale of Rajasthan and Electricity Boards of the said States in such proportion as the Central Government may, having regard to the benefits to

R. Krishnaiah Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Rep. by Its Cabinet Secretary, ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ConstitutionCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 262; Inter-State Water Disputes Act, 1956 - Sections 6, 6A and 11

Reported in : 1996(4)ALT175

to in clause (1).'Exercising law making authority under Entry 56 of List I the Parliament has made the River Boards Act, 1956 (Act 49 of 1956) to provide for the establishment of River Boards for the regulation and development of … States have to represent and protect.10. The main question agitated before us at the Bar has been whether Section 11 of the Inter-State Water Disputes Act is a bar to the jurisdiction of the Court. Learned counsel for

Vedire Venkata Reddy and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Environment

Acts : Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Sections 3 and 3(2); Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986 - Rule 5 and 5(3); Constitution of India - Articles 32, 131, 226, 262 and 262(2); Inter-State Water Disputes Act, 1956 - Sections 2 and 11; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 141 - Order 1, Rule 8

Reported in : AIR2005AP155; 2005(1)ALD325

Dispute Tribunal, which Tribunal alone can agitate these water disputes Under Section 5 of the Inter-State Water Disputes Act, 1956 and in view prohibition contained in Article 262(2) of the Constitution read with Section 11 of the Inter-State … proposed to be located before the confluence of Muneru tributary resulting inflow of water from Muneru into Krishna River and thereafter into Bay of Bengal. Since the capacity of Krishna Barrage is only 4 T.M.C., in recent … recognised is concerned, it includes, as stated above, four Directors, the Divisional Boards and four State Boards. The second part of this definition which comes

State of Himachal Pradesh. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 131, 262 (2), 363, 3; Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1966 - Sections 78, 54(3); Supreme Court Rules, 1966 - Order 23 Rule 6(a); Government of India Act, 1935 - Section 290-A; States Merger (Chief Commissioners Provinces) Order, 1949; Inter-State Water Disputes Act, 1956 - Section 11; State of Himachal Pradesh Act, 1970 - Section 38

water of an inter-state river is barred under clause (2) of Article 262 of the Constitution read with Section 11 of the Inter-State Water Disputes Act, 1956. 49. Clause (2) of Article 262 of the Constitution provides that … Irrigation and Power on 17.04.1967 regarding the formation of two separate Electricity Boards for Haryana and Punjab and related matters have been circulated by a … however, continued to be a Part-C State until it became a Union Territory by the Constitution (7th Amendment) Act, 1956. In 1966, Parliament enacted the Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1966 which bifurcated the erstwhile State of Punjab to two

M. Sreenivasulu Reddy and ors. Vs. Kishore R. Chhabria and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 6, 87, 111 and 111A; Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 - Sections 11, 11B, 15I, 15Y and 20A; Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1994 - Regulations 2, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 33, 37, 39; Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997 - Regulations 10, 11 and 12

Reported in : [2002]109CompCas18(Bom)

the use, distribution or control of waters of or in any inter-State river or river valley. Section 11 of the Inter-State Water Disputes Act, 1956, … exercise all the powers and do all the acts and things which may be exercised by the Board. Section 11 of the Act deals with the functions of the Board. The provisions of this section which are relevant … for being in breach of the provisions of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1994 (hereinafter referred … para. 2 of the order :'These items include proposed resolutions under Sections 257 and 284 of the Companies Act, 1956.'20. Counter Suit No. 297 of 1997 and Notice of Motion No. 184 of 1999 therein: Defendants Nos. 3,

State of Haryana Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1996 - Sections 78 and 78(1); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 32, 131, 142, 142(1), 143, 144, 145(3), 262, 262(2), 246(3) and 356; Inter-State Water Disputes Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 3, 4(1), 4(2), 4(3), 5(2), 5(3), 5(4), 5A to 13 and 14; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11, 15, 20 and 51 - Order 23, Rules 1 and 32; Supreme Court Rules, 1966 - Order 23, Rule 6 - Order 32, Rules 1, 2 and 3 - Order 47, Rule 6; Commission of Inquiry Act, 1952; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 36 to 42; Supreme Court (Decrees and Orders) Enforcement Order, 1954

Reported in : JT2004(5)SC72; 2004(6)SCALE75; (2004)12SCC673

from the erstwhile State of Punjab, the question of apportionment of the river waters made available to the erstwhile State of Punjab between Haryana and … first two clauses of clause 9 of the Settlement, Section 14 was added to the Inter-State Water Disputes Act, 1956 and issues relating to the usage, share and allocation of the Ravi-Beas waters were referred to the adjudication … State of A.P. : AIR2001SC1560 this Court had considered the provisions of Article 262(2) of the Constitution and Section 11 and Section 2(c) of the Inter- State Water Disputes Act and its impact on a suit filed under … reverse under the guise of re-adjusting'.44. Santa Rita Oil Company V. State Board of Equalization ALR 126 757 was a case in which a decree