Advanced Search Results

V. Ramachandra Reddy and anr. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Samithis and Zilla Parishads Act, 1959 - Sections 2, 3(1) and 3(3); Madras General Clauses Act, 1891 - Sections 15 and 21; General Clauses Act, 1897; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1965AP40

act of issuing the notification itself. Examples of the latter type of creation of corporate bodies are the River Boards Act, 1956, the State Financial Corporation Act, the Road Transport Corporation Act, 1950,. the Electricity Supply Act, 1948. These Acts … It may be stated that the Government has in exercise of the powers conferred by Clause (b) of Section 2 of the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Samithis and Zilla Parishads Act (XXXV of 1959) (hereinafter called the 'Zilla … constituted under the Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Village Panchayats Act 1950 (Act X of 1950) and in relation to the Telangana area a gram panchayat

In Re : Networking of Rivers

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 262

the case of the petitioner that the Inter-State Water Disputes Act, 1956 (for short `the Act') and the River Boards Act, 1956 were enacted by the Parliament under Article 262 read with Entry 56 of List-I of the Seventh Schedule … thereto. For example, the Supreme Court can certainly direct the Central Government to fulfill its statutory obligation under Section 4 of the Act, which is mandatory, without deciding any water dispute between the States. [See : Tamil … 00 Punjab 28.21 6.35 27.96 5.75 28.15 6.16 Haryana 34.23 8.27 40.18 10.00 35.36 8.74 All India 56.44 27.09 49.01 23.62 54.88 26.1041. Thus, they

Orient Paper and Industries Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR2009MP143

of water of inter-State river. Entry 17, List-II is made subject to Entry 56 of List-I whereunder the River Boards Act, 1956 has been enacted. Section 13(a)(i) and (ii) and Section 15 deal with the Board's power with respect to … draw water for the Mill and the workers colony from the said river and permission was granted on 10-6-1964 on the condition that the petitioner-company should construct three regulators cum bunds on the river at its own

In the Matter of : Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ConstitutionCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 32, 38, 39, 73, 131, 137, 143, 162, 213, 245, 246, 248, 262, 371D and 374; Inter-state Water Disputes Act, 1956 - Sections 3, 5, 6, 11 and 152A; River Boards Act, 1956 - Sections 2 and 4; Karnataka Cauvery Basin Irrigation Protection Ordinance, 1991 - Sections 1 and 7; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 9(1) and 11; Customs Act, 1962; Life Insurance Corporation (Modification of Settlement) Act, 1976; Delhi Laws Act, 1912; Ajmer-Merwara (Extension of Laws) Act, 1947; Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1952 - Sections 7(1)

Reported in : AIR1992SC522; JT1991(4)SC361; 1991(2)SCALE1049; [1991]Supp2SCR497

as follows: Karnataka-177 TMC, Tamil Nadu including Pondicherry-489 TMC and Kerala-5 TMC.6. In 1956 the Parliament enacted the River Boards Act, 1956 for the purpose of regulation and development of inter-State rivers and river valleys and also the Inter-State Water … Court three questions for its opinion. The Reference reads as follows.:Whereas, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 4 of the Inter-State Water Disputes Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), the Central Government constituted … the negative.27. The State of Kerala has in its written submissions of 10th August, 1991 by and large supported the stand taken by the State

Jt. Cit, Gnr, Sr Vs. Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2005)93ITD321(Ahd.)

project of four States viz. Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Gujarat and Rajasthan with a terminal major dam on the river Narmada in Gujarat. The project is to create a concrete gravity dam of the height of 128 meters … the view expressed by the Madras High Court in Seshasayee Paper and Boards Ltd's case (1985) 156 ITR 542 on the ground that the Madras … of Gujarat has established the assessee Corporation as a wholly-owned Government Company under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 to take the execution of Sardar Sarovar Project - an inter-state multi-purpose project of four States viz. Madhya … the expenditure and income to work-in-progress account. Pursuant to the notice Under Section 148 the assessee filed return of income for the years under consideration, … distribution system is planned to be completed in 10/20 years. On completion of the project annual additional

Superintending Engineer and ors. Vs. Workmen of Machkund Hydro Electri ...

Court : Orissa

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10, 10(1), 15 and 25G; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1960Ori205

of the concern is also in Andhra Pradesh. For clarification, the position is as follows :The Project concerns river Machkund which falls down from over a hill and is locally known as Duduma Water Fall. The river … was started somewhere in 1947 and by August, 1956 the power house functioned to work generating electricity … clear whether more than one Government are also contemplated by the term 'State Government' in the definition.' Under Section 10 reference is made by the approprite Government to the Industrial dispute.Where the appropriate Government is of opinion that … would happen in such a contingency.Similarly with regard to the costitution ot Board of Conciliation and Court of Enquiry by appropriate Government as provided respectively … was not the 'appropriate Government' within the meaning of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Act XIV of 1947) and accordingly the said reference having been

The State of Tamil Nadu versus the State of Karnataka & Anr

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2026] 2 S.C.R. 285

of the Pennaiyar River between the State of Tamil Nadu and the State of Karnataka.Headnotes†Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956 - ss.3, 4 - Inter- State River Pennaiyar - Dispute as regards the sharing of the waters of … 1956. 2.10. On 30th November, 2019 the plaintiff-State lodged a complaint under Section 3 of the Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956, calling upon the … relating to the construction of the dam had commenced, a fact which was further corroborated by the display board erected at the site. 2.6. Ultimately, vide communication dated 1 st July, 2013, the defendant-State responded to the

S. Nagaraja and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 131, 226 and 262; ;Inter State Water Disputes Act, 1956 - Sections 4 and 5; River Boards Act, 1956 - Sections 4(4)

Reported in : 2003(2)KarLJ88

prayers sought for in this writ petition are.--(a) To declare the Inter Water Dispute Act, 1956 and the River Boards Act, 1956 are void and unconstitutional, the legislation traversing beyond Article 262 and Entry 56 of Union List, when the … traversing beyond Article 262 and Entry 56 of Union List, when the Act included tributaries, if any, in Section 4(4) of the River Boards Act;(b) To quash the constitution of Kaveri Water Dispute, Tribunal;(e) To declare that … declined to entertain the writ petition filed directly before it for the 10 reasons assigned in paragraph 2.(iii) Ramesh Kumar Sharma v. State of Punjab,

Municipal Board and anr. Vs. Harilal

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 33; Rajasthan Regulation of Boating Act, 1956 - Sections 3; Rajasthan Regulation of Boating Rules, 1957 - Rule 4

Reported in : AIR1988Raj7; 1987(2)WLN901

expiry of six months from the commencement of this Act, no person shall ply a boat in any river or lake, whether for pleasure or for hire or otherwise, except under the authority, and in accordance with … that even statutory requirement of getting thefitness certificate according to the provisions of the Rajasthan Regulation of Boating Act, 1956, were flagrantly disregarded, clearly contravened and grossly violated in the present case. Section 3 reads as under: --'After … for grant and renewal of the certificate of fitness shall be Rs. 10/- and Rs. 5/- respectively in respect of every boat. (c) An application … in the clutches of death. The motor boat provided by the Municipal Board and not by a private agency,on payment of hire which was meant

M.D. Narayan Vs. State of Karnataka and Others Overruled

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14, 141, 245, 246 and 371-D; Bangalore City Planning Area Zonal Regulations (Amendment and Validation) Act, 1996 - Sections 1(3), 2, 3 and 4; Principal Act, 1963 - Sections 9, 10, 11, 12, 13(1) and 14; Life Insurance Corporation (Modified) of Settlement) Act, 1976; Karnataka State Civil Services (Regulation of Promotion Pay and Pension) Act, 1973; Karnataka Act, 1974; State Reorganisation Act, 1956 - Sections 115; Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961; Inter-State Water Disputes Act, 1956 - Sections 3 and 4

Reported in : 1999(4)KarLJ572

State of Karnataka and Tamil Nadu. The last agreement expired in 1974. In 1956 the Parliament enacted the River Boards Act for the purpose of regulation and development of inter-State rivers and river valleys. Inter-State Water Disputes Act, 1956 … to bring it in conformity with the Outline Development Plan and the Zonal Regulations appended thereto promulgated under Section 13{4) of the main Act and thereafter to pass further necessary orders and to take consequential action in … Court, some of the occupants of the premises filed Writ Petition Nos. 10261 and 10262 of 1987 challenging the action of the Commissioner in implementing