Advanced Search Results

Court on Its Own Motion Vs. Dept. of Women and Child Development and O ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

due to sheer negligence, omission or even deliberately. In support of this plea, it is mentioned that under Right to Information Act, 2005, information was received by the applicant from Central Jail No.7 which discloses that during the period October, … JJB shall be sent back to the concerned Magistrates. (iii) Attention of the Magistrate is also drawn to Section 7 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of the Children) Act, 2000 as well as Rule 12 of … of the Constitution of India; contrary to the provisions of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as the JJ Act) apart from adverse psychological impact on these children. Obviously such a

Justice k.s.puttaswamy(retd) Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

applied is whether the law satisfies ‘public interest’. Nariman, J., on the other hand, pointed out that the Right to Information Act, 2005 has provided for personal information being disclosed to third parties subject to ‘larger public interest’ being satisfied. … encrypted immediately upon capture. The decryption key is with the UIDAI solely. Section 2(ze) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘IT Act’) which defines ‘secure systems’ and Section 2(w) of the Act, which … right of transgenders of self determination 32 (2018) 5 SCC133 See paras 72-79 of the judgment 34 (2014) 5 SCC438Writ Petition (Civil) No.494 of 2012

Sugar (Appellant) Vs. British Broadcasting Corporation and Another (Re ...

Court : House of Lords

Subject : MRTP

LORD PHILLIPS OF WORTH MATRAVERS My Lords, Introduction 1. The Freedom of Information Act 2000 (“the Act”) provides for a general right of access to information held by public authorities. That right is … shall describe as “public information". The other information held by them I shall describe as “excluded information". 8. Section 7(1) in Part I provides: “Where a public authority is listed in Schedule 1 only in relation to information

Secretary General, Supreme Court of India Vs. Subhash Chandra Agarwal

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to information

Acts : Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 4(1), 6, 6(2), 6(3), 7, 8, 8(1), 10. 22 and 24; Government Act, 1978; Judicial Disclosure Responsibility Act, 2007; Human Rights Act, 1993; Representation of People Act, 1951; Official Secrets Act, 1923; Freedom of Information Act 2000; Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968; Indian Trusts Act - Sections 88; Environmental Information Regulations, 2004; Constitution of India - Articles 3, 10, 14, 19, 19(1), 21, 32, 121, 122, 123, 124, (7), 124(2), 124(5), 217, 217(1), 233 and 235

Reported in : 166(2010)DLT305; 2010(1)KarLJ472

petition filed by the Central Public Information Officer, Supreme Court of India (hereinafter, 'the CPIO') nominated under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (hereinafter, 'the Act') questioning correctness and legality of the order dated 6th January, 2009 of the Central … Rights' (2nd Edition, Thomson, Sweet & Maxwell 2007) explains the holding requirement in the context of Freedom of Information Act, 2000 (UK), thus:'When information is 'held' by a public authorityFor the purposes of the Freedom of Information Act 2000, … be asserted and maintained within the meaning of the expression defined in Section 2(j) of the Act. Equally important are the questions requiring interpretation of … had given certain directions about disclosure. In the course of hearing on 7th October, 2009, on CM No. 14043/2009, the learned Attorney General for India

Subhash Popatlal Dave Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Bombay High Court. One of the questions of law, which had been raised, is whether under the Right to Information Act, 2005, the Petitioner was entitled to copies of the detention order before its execution, which question was negated … strengthened. In the said case, the detenue was found to be absconding and action was accordingly taken under Section 7 of the COFEPOSA Act and he was declared to be a proclaimed offender. Despite the several efforts made

X Corp vs Union of India

Court : Karnataka

OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT DECLARING THAT SECTION 79(3)(b) OF THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT, 2000 (IT ACT) DOES NOT CONFER AUTHORITY TO ISSUE INFORMATION BLOCKING ORDERS UNDER THE IT ACT, AND FURTHER DECLARE … covers all the alleged acts of the Union of India, in communicating take down orders or curtailing the right to free speech. He would contend that Section 79(3)(b) of the IT Act was never envisaged as an empowering … in Brij Bhushan v. State of Delhi [(1950) SCR 605] followed the earlier decision in the context of Section 7(1)(c) of the East Punjab Public Safety Act,1949. Fazl Ali, J., in his dissenting judgment gave the expression “public

Mr.G Permasivam Vs. Ut of Andaman and Nicobar

Court : Central Information Commission CIC

Subject : Right to Information

Matched in: Court Central Information Commission CIC

Sugar (Deceased) (Represented by Fiona Paveley) Vs. British Broadcasti ...

Court : UK Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

which the appellant so strongly relies: Matky. The complainant there was seeking, against the background of a general right to information under the Czech legal system, access to documentation concerning the construction of a new nuclear power station and … 1. Although the British Broadcasting Corporation ("the BBC") is listed as a public authority in the Freedom of Information Act 2000, the Act, as I will call it, applies to the BBC only to a limited extent. The words … wish to obviate dispute about the identity of the public authorities who were subject to the Act. 31. Section 7(1) of the Act provides: "Where a public authority is listed in Schedule 1 only in relation to information

Sri Jayanth Balakrishna vs Sri B Pradeep

Court : Karnataka

29 -(a) Notice dated 22.09.2007 issued by Assistant Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, (Transition)-2, Bangalore under Section 11 of the Right to Information Act, 2005 addressed to M/s.Pooja Constructions.(b) Order dated 18.10.2007 passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, under Section 7 … architect. As such, the contract between the plaintiff and the architect stood terminated during the month of April 2000. Plaintiff had accordingly approached another architect to execute the work. (h). Defendant had raised the third bill dated

Sahyog Mahila Mandal and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 - Sections 7(1), 14 and 15, 15(1) and 15(4); Immoral Traffic in Women and Girls Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 3(1), 3(2), 3(2A), 3 to 10, 4, 4(2), 5, 5A, 6, 6(3), 7, 7(1), 7(1A) 7(3), 8, 9, 10A, 10(2) 12, 14, 15 15(4), 15(5), 15(6A), 16, 16(1), 16(2) 17(1), 17(2), 17(3), 17(4), 17(5), 18, 18(1), 18(2), 19, 19(3) 20, 21 and 22; Immoral Traffic in Women and Girls (Bombay) Rules, 1958; Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 - Sections 6, 6A and 23; Immoral Traffic in Women and Girls Rules, 1985 - Rules 5, 12, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 and 41; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 3, 6, 14, 19, 19(1), 19(5), 21, 23, 39, 46, 51A 142(1), 145(5) and 253; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 138, 143, 151, 188, 225-B, 269, 284, 289, 291, 294, 323, 326,

Reported in : (2004)2GLR1764

intervention programmes will have no impact. It is contended that the women in prostitution/sex work are entitled to right to privacy, and equal protection of law and that prostitution or sex work, which is one of the oldest … Mithikhadi, Dhastipura Nasirnagar and Fulwadi localities in Surat district. As per the information of the Police Department, Nirmala Swami, the president of the petitioner Mandal, … provisions of Sections 7(1)(b), 14 and 15 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 on the ground that they violate the fundamental rights guaranteed under … India. They also challenge the notification dated 23.2.2000 issued by the Commissioner of Police under the provisions of Section 7(1)(b) by which the areas within the jurisdiction of Chakla Bazaar Police Station, Surat were notified rendering carrying on