Advanced Search Results
Shivanna Naik Vs. Bangalore University, Jnana Bharathi and anr.
Karnataka
Sep-28-2005
Constitution
Karnataka Right to Information Act (RTI), 2000 - Sections 2; Karnataka State Universities Act, 1976 - Sections 2(9) and 3; Karnataka State Universities (Amendment) Act, 1987; Constitution of India - Article 12; Bangalore University Regulations
ILR2005KAR5747; 2006(1)KarLJ113
respondent, submitted an application requisition the respondent to furnish the details' as per the provisions of the Karnataka Right to Information Act, 2000, which application has been rejected on the ground that there is no provision to furnish the documents under … 12 of the Constitution of India and also falls under the definition of Public Authority as defined under Section 2(c) of the Karnataka Right to Information Act, 2000. In support of his submission he has also relied … is of the opinion that the writ petition must be allowed. (Para 5) - LABOUR & SERVICES Wage Revision: [S.N. Sathyanarayana,J] Benefit of wage increase
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSasidharan M.G. vs Union of India
Kerala
Jun-15-2022
of content in cable television networks and the internet (including the intermediaries as defined under the Information Technology Act, 2000 and private persons) on the proper use and publication of images/ audio and video; ii. to issue a … There must be a judicially enforceable right for the enforcement of which a mandamus will lie. The legal right to enforce the performance of a duty must be in the applicant himself. In general, therefore, the Court will … TV channels All programme telecasted on private TV channels are required toadhere to the Programme Code prescribed under Section 5 of the Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995 and the rules framed thereunder. The Programme Code contains a
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPlay Games 24X7 Private Limited vs State of Tamil Nadu
Chennai
Jun-03-2025
the Petitioners submit that the RMG Regulations are indirect derogation of the central legislation, particularly the Information Technology Act, 2000 ("IT Act") and the rules framed thereunder, including the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) … Indian Constitution, viz., "Trade and Commerce". If that is the case, then the State certainly will have the right to regulate games, as is contemplated in Chapters IV and V of the impugned Act. Though the aspect of … New Delhi 110003. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, declaring Section 5(2) read with Section 14(1)(c) of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Online Gambling and Regulation of Online Games Act, 2022
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Baljeet Singh Vs. M.C.D. and ors.
Delhi
May-08-2013
Education
18, 2000.10. The Tribunal noted that on November 20, 2009, Baljeet claims to have received information under the Right to Information Act as per which one Bhuvneshwar Prashad S/o Jwala Prashad had been appointed as a School Attendant in the … the subject of limitation the Tribunal appears to have been misled by the fact that by virtue of Section 21 of the Administrative Tribunals Act 1985 limitation period prescribed is 1 year, but forgot that in the … that as per a select list published on February 25”53. School Attendants, 50 Chowkidars, 29 Nursery Aaya and 49 Safai Karamcharis were appointed on contract
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS. Bharat Kumar and Others Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and Others
Andhra Pradesh
Oct-16-2000
ConstitutionElectricity
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 38(2), 45, 48, 200, 213, 226, 254 and 300-A; Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reforms Act, 1988 - Sections 3, 5, 9(2), 10(7), 11(3), 12, 21(2), 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 23(4), 25(5), 26(7), 28, 29, 30, 31, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44 and 54(2); Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reforms (Transfer Scheme) Rules, 1999 - Rules 4, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10; Electricity Supply Act, 1948 - Sections 3(1), 49, 57-A, 76 and 78-A; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 52; Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998 - Sections 18 and 19; Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission (Conduct of Business) Regulations, 1999
2000(6)ALD217; 2000(6)ALT1
Matched in: Citation 2000(6)ALD217; 2000(6)ALT1
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajesh Rameshchandra Sharma vs Union of India and Ors
Delhi
May-29-2026
Right to Information
13 SCC 61 : (2014) 2 SCC (Civ) 131] dealt with the provisions of Section 8(1)(g) of the Right to Information Act, 2005. A person claiming to be a public-spirited citizen sought information under the statute from the Bihar Public … the dissemination of such information on the internet.90. The respondent submits that under Section 69A of the InformationTechnology Act, 2000, (hereinafter, IT Act, 2000) the Central Government is empowered to direct blocking of information accessible through computer resources … APPL. 15925/2023 SHAKTINIDHI BAKHSHI .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 5400/2023, CM APPL. 21149/2023 SK .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. Ishwarprasad Gilada vs Union of India and Ors.
Delhi
May-29-2026
Right to Information
13 SCC 61 : (2014) 2 SCC (Civ) 131] dealt with the provisions of Section 8(1)(g) of the Right to Information Act, 2005. A person claiming to be a public-spirited citizen sought information under the statute from the Bihar Public … the dissemination of such information on the internet.90. The respondent submits that under Section 69A of the InformationTechnology Act, 2000, (hereinafter, IT Act, 2000) the Central Government is empowered to direct blocking of information accessible through computer resources … APPL. 15925/2023 SHAKTINIDHI BAKHSHI .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 5400/2023, CM APPL. 21149/2023 SK .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSanjeev Sehgal vs Union of India & Ors.
Delhi
May-29-2026
Right to Information
13 SCC 61 : (2014) 2 SCC (Civ) 131] dealt with the provisions of Section 8(1)(g) of the Right to Information Act, 2005. A person claiming to be a public-spirited citizen sought information under the statute from the Bihar Public … the dissemination of such information on the internet.90. The respondent submits that under Section 69A of the InformationTechnology Act, 2000, (hereinafter, IT Act, 2000) the Central Government is empowered to direct blocking of information accessible through computer resources … APPL. 15925/2023 SHAKTINIDHI BAKHSHI .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 5400/2023, CM APPL. 21149/2023 SK .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShaktinidhi Bakhshi vs Union of India & Ors.
Delhi
May-29-2026
Right to Information
13 SCC 61 : (2014) 2 SCC (Civ) 131] dealt with the provisions of Section 8(1)(g) of the Right to Information Act, 2005. A person claiming to be a public-spirited citizen sought information under the statute from the Bihar Public … the dissemination of such information on the internet.90. The respondent submits that under Section 69A of the InformationTechnology Act, 2000, (hereinafter, IT Act, 2000) the Central Government is empowered to direct blocking of information accessible through computer resources … APPL. 15925/2023 SHAKTINIDHI BAKHSHI .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 5400/2023, CM APPL. 21149/2023 SK .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAshok Kumar Singh vs Union of India & Ors.
Delhi
May-29-2026
Right to Information
13 SCC 61 : (2014) 2 SCC (Civ) 131] dealt with the provisions of Section 8(1)(g) of the Right to Information Act, 2005. A person claiming to be a public-spirited citizen sought information under the statute from the Bihar Public … the dissemination of such information on the internet.90. The respondent submits that under Section 69A of the InformationTechnology Act, 2000, (hereinafter, IT Act, 2000) the Central Government is empowered to direct blocking of information accessible through computer resources … APPL. 15925/2023 SHAKTINIDHI BAKHSHI .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 5400/2023, CM APPL. 21149/2023 SK .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »