Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: right to information act 2000 section 5 · Page 1 of about 25,072 results (0.285 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 28 2005

Shivanna Naik Vs. Bangalore University, Jnana Bharathi and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-28-2005

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Karnataka Right to Information Act (RTI), 2000 - Sections 2; Karnataka State Universities Act, 1976 - Sections 2(9) and 3; Karnataka State Universities (Amendment) Act, 1987; Constitution of India - Article 12; Bangalore University Regulations

Reported in : ILR2005KAR5747; 2006(1)KarLJ113

respondent, submitted an application requisition the respondent to furnish the details' as per the provisions of the Karnataka Right to Information Act, 2000, which application has been rejected on the ground that there is no provision to furnish the documents under … 12 of the Constitution of India and also falls under the definition of Public Authority as defined under Section 2(c) of the Karnataka Right to Information Act, 2000. In support of his submission he has also relied … is of the opinion that the writ petition must be allowed. (Para 5) - LABOUR & SERVICES Wage Revision: [S.N. Sathyanarayana,J] Benefit of wage increase

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 15 2022

Sasidharan M.G. vs Union of India

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jun-15-2022

of content in cable television networks and the internet (including the intermediaries as defined under the Information Technology Act, 2000 and private persons) on the proper use and publication of images/ audio and video; ii. to issue a … There must be a judicially enforceable right for the enforcement of which a mandamus will lie. The legal right to enforce the performance of a duty must be in the applicant himself. In general, therefore, the Court will … TV channels All programme telecasted on private TV channels are required toadhere to the Programme Code prescribed under Section 5 of the Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995 and the rules framed thereunder. The Programme Code contains a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 03 2025

Play Games 24X7 Private Limited vs State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-03-2025

the Petitioners submit that the RMG Regulations are indirect derogation of the central legislation, particularly the Information Technology Act, 2000 ("IT Act") and the rules framed thereunder, including the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) … Indian Constitution, viz., "Trade and Commerce". If that is the case, then the State certainly will have the right to regulate games, as is contemplated in Chapters IV and V of the impugned Act. Though the aspect of … New Delhi 110003. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, declaring Section 5(2) read with Section 14(1)(c) of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Online Gambling and Regulation of Online Games Act, 2022

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 08 2013

Baljeet Singh Vs. M.C.D. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-08-2013

Subject : Education

18, 2000.10. The Tribunal noted that on November 20, 2009, Baljeet claims to have received information under the Right to Information Act as per which one Bhuvneshwar Prashad S/o Jwala Prashad had been appointed as a School Attendant in the … the subject of limitation the Tribunal appears to have been misled by the fact that by virtue of Section 21 of the Administrative Tribunals Act 1985 limitation period prescribed is 1 year, but forgot that in the … that as per a select list published on February 25”53. School Attendants, 50 Chowkidars, 29 Nursery Aaya and 49 Safai Karamcharis were appointed on contract

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 16 2000

S. Bharat Kumar and Others Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-16-2000

Subject : ConstitutionElectricity

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 38(2), 45, 48, 200, 213, 226, 254 and 300-A; Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reforms Act, 1988 - Sections 3, 5, 9(2), 10(7), 11(3), 12, 21(2), 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 23(4), 25(5), 26(7), 28, 29, 30, 31, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44 and 54(2); Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reforms (Transfer Scheme) Rules, 1999 - Rules 4, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10; Electricity Supply Act, 1948 - Sections 3(1), 49, 57-A, 76 and 78-A; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 52; Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998 - Sections 18 and 19; Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission (Conduct of Business) Regulations, 1999

Reported in : 2000(6)ALD217; 2000(6)ALT1

Matched in: Citation 2000(6)ALD217; 2000(6)ALT1

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 29 2026

Rajesh Rameshchandra Sharma vs Union of India and Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-29-2026

Subject : Right to Information

13 SCC 61 : (2014) 2 SCC (Civ) 131] dealt with the provisions of Section 8(1)(g) of the Right to Information Act, 2005. A person claiming to be a public-spirited citizen sought information under the statute from the Bihar Public … the dissemination of such information on the internet.90. The respondent submits that under Section 69A of the InformationTechnology Act, 2000, (hereinafter, IT Act, 2000) the Central Government is empowered to direct blocking of information accessible through computer resources … APPL. 15925/2023 SHAKTINIDHI BAKHSHI .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 5400/2023, CM APPL. 21149/2023 SK .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 29 2026

Dr. Ishwarprasad Gilada vs Union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-29-2026

Subject : Right to Information

13 SCC 61 : (2014) 2 SCC (Civ) 131] dealt with the provisions of Section 8(1)(g) of the Right to Information Act, 2005. A person claiming to be a public-spirited citizen sought information under the statute from the Bihar Public … the dissemination of such information on the internet.90. The respondent submits that under Section 69A of the InformationTechnology Act, 2000, (hereinafter, IT Act, 2000) the Central Government is empowered to direct blocking of information accessible through computer resources … APPL. 15925/2023 SHAKTINIDHI BAKHSHI .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 5400/2023, CM APPL. 21149/2023 SK .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 29 2026

Sanjeev Sehgal vs Union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-29-2026

Subject : Right to Information

13 SCC 61 : (2014) 2 SCC (Civ) 131] dealt with the provisions of Section 8(1)(g) of the Right to Information Act, 2005. A person claiming to be a public-spirited citizen sought information under the statute from the Bihar Public … the dissemination of such information on the internet.90. The respondent submits that under Section 69A of the InformationTechnology Act, 2000, (hereinafter, IT Act, 2000) the Central Government is empowered to direct blocking of information accessible through computer resources … APPL. 15925/2023 SHAKTINIDHI BAKHSHI .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 5400/2023, CM APPL. 21149/2023 SK .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 29 2026

Shaktinidhi Bakhshi vs Union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-29-2026

Subject : Right to Information

13 SCC 61 : (2014) 2 SCC (Civ) 131] dealt with the provisions of Section 8(1)(g) of the Right to Information Act, 2005. A person claiming to be a public-spirited citizen sought information under the statute from the Bihar Public … the dissemination of such information on the internet.90. The respondent submits that under Section 69A of the InformationTechnology Act, 2000, (hereinafter, IT Act, 2000) the Central Government is empowered to direct blocking of information accessible through computer resources … APPL. 15925/2023 SHAKTINIDHI BAKHSHI .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 5400/2023, CM APPL. 21149/2023 SK .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 29 2026

Ashok Kumar Singh vs Union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-29-2026

Subject : Right to Information

13 SCC 61 : (2014) 2 SCC (Civ) 131] dealt with the provisions of Section 8(1)(g) of the Right to Information Act, 2005. A person claiming to be a public-spirited citizen sought information under the statute from the Bihar Public … the dissemination of such information on the internet.90. The respondent submits that under Section 69A of the InformationTechnology Act, 2000, (hereinafter, IT Act, 2000) the Central Government is empowered to direct blocking of information accessible through computer resources … APPL. 15925/2023 SHAKTINIDHI BAKHSHI .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 5400/2023, CM APPL. 21149/2023 SK .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial