Advanced Search Results

Shivanna Naik Vs. Bangalore University, Jnana Bharathi and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Karnataka Right to Information Act (RTI), 2000 - Sections 2; Karnataka State Universities Act, 1976 - Sections 2(9) and 3; Karnataka State Universities (Amendment) Act, 1987; Constitution of India - Article 12; Bangalore University Regulations

Reported in : ILR2005KAR5747; 2006(1)KarLJ113

respondent, submitted an application requisition the respondent to furnish the details' as per the provisions of the Karnataka Right to Information Act, 2000, which application has been rejected on the ground that there is no provision to furnish the documents under … 12 of the Constitution of India and also falls under the definition of Public Authority as defined under Section 2(c) of the Karnataka Right to Information Act, 2000. In support of his submission he has also relied

Biplab Ranjan Bose Vs. Public Service Commission and Ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005 - Section 6(1); ;Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000; ;West Bengal Scheduled Castes and Schedules Tribes (Reservation of Vacancies in Services and Posts) Act, 1976 - Section 4; ;Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) (Amendment) Act, 2006; ;West Bengal Civil Service (Judicial) Recruitment Rules, 1951; ;West Bengal Judicial (Conditions of Service) Rules, 2004 - Rule 9

marks including his marks in the personality test. Petitioner, by filing an application under Section 6(1) of the Right to Information Act, 2005, could get in writing that he got 490 marks in aggregate. He then submitted representation addressed to … Government for taking necessary steps to implement the provisions of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 as amended in the year 2006. In the event of respondent authorities complying with the said direction, there … of Juvenile Justice Board in each and every district. Referring to Schedule, being No. (IV) to (IX) under Section 4 of the West Bengal Scheduled Castes and Schedules Tribes (Reservation of Vacancies in Services and Posts) Act, 1976,

Secretary General, Supreme Court of India Vs. Subhash Chandra Agarwal

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to information

Acts : Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 4(1), 6, 6(2), 6(3), 7, 8, 8(1), 10. 22 and 24; Government Act, 1978; Judicial Disclosure Responsibility Act, 2007; Human Rights Act, 1993; Representation of People Act, 1951; Official Secrets Act, 1923; Freedom of Information Act 2000; Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968; Indian Trusts Act - Sections 88; Environmental Information Regulations, 2004; Constitution of India - Articles 3, 10, 14, 19, 19(1), 21, 32, 121, 122, 123, 124, (7), 124(2), 124(5), 217, 217(1), 233 and 235

Reported in : 166(2010)DLT305; 2010(1)KarLJ472

petition filed by the Central Public Information Officer, Supreme Court of India (hereinafter, 'the CPIO') nominated under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (hereinafter, 'the Act') questioning correctness and legality of the order dated 6th January, 2009 of the Central … Rights' (2nd Edition, Thomson, Sweet & Maxwell 2007) explains the holding requirement in the context of Freedom of Information Act, 2000 (UK), thus:'When information is 'held' by a public authorityFor the purposes of the Freedom of Information Act 2000, … on being asked for it by a citizen but requires it to suo moto make the information accessible. Section 4(1)(a) of the Act requires every public authority to maintain all its records duly catalogued and indexed in a

Tata Sky Ltd Vs. Youtube Llc and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

bound to protect. Please be advised that this is an offence under Section 66 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 read with Section 107 and 109 of the Indian Penal Code. 9. .. Therefore, you are required to … to receive High Definition ( HD ) content, free of cost.This is illegal and violative of Tata Sky rights and the rights of the broadcasters who own the HD content broadcast through Tata Sky Platform, whose rights … IA No. 48/2016 (seeking deletion of Defendant No. 2 from array of parties) 1. This

Mohammad Irfan Vs. the Inspector of Police

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code(IPC) - Sections 302 and 506(2); Code of Criminal Procedure(CrPC) - Section 207, 401, 24(8), 25, 482; Constitution of India - Articles 21 ; Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Amendment Act, 2006 - Section 4(2), 4(3),; Central Act, - Section 68; The Juvenile Justice [Care and Protection of Children] Rules, 2007 - Rules 4 and 5, 9(1)(2); The Tamil Nadu Juvenile Justice [Care and Protection of Children] Rules, 2001 - Rule 8A(3)(c), 95

proposal in detail. Under sub section (1) of Section (4) of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 as amended in 2006 and sub-rule 1 of rule 3 and sub-rule 4 of rule 4 of the … with law itself is a fundamental right and in other words, a human right. Such children have a right to express their defence freely. Alleging that fair enquiry has not been provided, the petitioner / juvenile in conflict … day also, the designated Principal Magistrate was on leave.(iv) Yet another shocking information furnished by the learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions from the Investigating Officer,

S. Bharat Kumar and Others Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ConstitutionElectricity

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 38(2), 45, 48, 200, 213, 226, 254 and 300-A; Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reforms Act, 1988 - Sections 3, 5, 9(2), 10(7), 11(3), 12, 21(2), 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 23(4), 25(5), 26(7), 28, 29, 30, 31, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44 and 54(2); Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reforms (Transfer Scheme) Rules, 1999 - Rules 4, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10; Electricity Supply Act, 1948 - Sections 3(1), 49, 57-A, 76 and 78-A; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 52; Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998 - Sections 18 and 19; Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission (Conduct of Business) Regulations, 1999

Reported in : 2000(6)ALD217; 2000(6)ALT1

Matched in: Citation 2000(6)ALD217; 2000(6)ALT1

Shankar Shah Walke Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh, Department of Panc ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

are amendable to judicial review under Article 226 of the Constitution. Section 4(1).of the recently enacted statute, the Right to Information Act, 2005, also requires every public authority of India to ‘provide reasons for its administrative or quasi-judicial decisions to

Competition Commission of South Africa Vs. Arcerlormittal South Africa ...

Court : South Africa Supreme Court of Appeal

Subject : MRTP

document to which the Commission is required or entitled to restrict access in terms the Promotion of Access to Information Act, 2000 (Act No. 2 of 2000) (PAIA),46which is in issue here. [49] There is no dispute that once the … it sought the Commission record pertaining to the complaint. It contends that Commission rule 15(1), which gives a right to any person “ not only to a person being investigated for a prohibited practice “ to inspect or … for price fixing and market allocation in relation to rebar, wire rod, sections (including rounds, squares angles and profiles). 8.8 Scaw confirmed in the application … by a claim it had made to confidentiality in terms of s 44(1)(a) of the Act. The position, so it reasoned, was thus governed by

Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax Large Taxpayer Unit, Ch ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

as follows: As regards the second contention, I do not think that the appellant is entitled, as of right, to a personal hearing. It is no doubt a principle of natural justice that a quasi judicial tribunal cannot … the Hon ble Supreme Court in Flock India Pvt. Ltd., reported in 2000 (120) ELT 285. 6. Aggrieved by the order of the Commissioner (Appeals), … value cannot be determined under the clause (iii) of the proviso to clause (a) of sub-section (1) of section 4 of the Act, the value of the goods so sold shall be determined- (i) in a case where … in support of the defence, in the adjudication. The assessee was also informed to indicate as to whether they should be heard in person also.

Peoples Union For Civil Liberties Vs. The State Of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

(earlier Section 21 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2000)  Sections 8(1)(g) & (h) and 8(2) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 16 The Amicus Curiae has prepared the following suggestions on the basis of which appropriate guidelines can … ....Respondent(s) WITH Criminal Appeal No 1256 of 1999 Criminal Appeal No 1367 of 1999 Contempt Petition (Civil) No 47 of 2011 in Writ Petition (C) No 316 of 2008 TC (C) No 27 of 2011 Writ Petition