Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: right to information act 2000 section 3 · Page 1 of about 24,940 results (0.321 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 28 2005

Shivanna Naik Vs. Bangalore University, Jnana Bharathi and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-28-2005

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Karnataka Right to Information Act (RTI), 2000 - Sections 2; Karnataka State Universities Act, 1976 - Sections 2(9) and 3; Karnataka State Universities (Amendment) Act, 1987; Constitution of India - Article 12; Bangalore University Regulations

Reported in : ILR2005KAR5747; 2006(1)KarLJ113

respondent, submitted an application requisition the respondent to furnish the details' as per the provisions of the Karnataka Right to Information Act, 2000, which application has been rejected on the ground that there is no provision to furnish the documents under … under Section 2(9) of the Karnataka Universities Act, 1976 as hereunder:'University' means a University established and incorporated under Section 3 of the Act.Section 3 of the Act reads as hereunder Establishment and incorporation of Universities.-(1) There shall be

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 2008

D. Dwaraka D/O. D.V. Ramana Vs. the Registrar (Admn.), High Court of A ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-30-2008

Subject : Service

Acts : Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005 - Sections 6; Andhra Pradesh Scheduled Castes (Rationalisation of Reservations) Act, 2000 - Sections 3 and 7; Karnataka Tax on Entry of Goods into Local Areas for Consumption, Use or Sale Therein Act, 1979; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15, 16, 141, 338(9) and 341; Andhra Pradesh State and Subordinate Service Rules, 1996 - Rule 22 and 22A; Andhra Pradesh Scheduled Castes (Rationalisation of Reservations) Rules, 2000 - Rule 3

Reported in : 2008(5)ALD734; 2008(6)ALT589

Article 14 of Constitution of India.2. Petitioner made application dated 18.5.2007 to first respondent under Section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005, requesting for copies of list of selectees for the post of Typists approved by High Court of … of 59.25 marks. Notification was issued on 07.10.2003. At that time Andhra Pradesh Scheduled Castes (Rationalisation of Reservations) Act 2000 (Rationalisation Act, for brevity) providing classification of SC candidates into A, B, C & D categories, was in … 2 and 7 are reserved for SC (Women) and SC (general) respectively. Here it may be noticed that Section 3 of Rationalisation Act classified SCs into A, B, C and D categories and provided one percent, seven percent,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 14 2005

Suresh Jindal Vs. Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-14-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 1986 - Sections 14; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 3 to 11, 12 to 18, 26, 28, 36(2), 37, 40, 49A, 50, 51, 53, 60 and 67 to 69; Indian Electricity (Amendment) Act, 1956; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 5 to 18, 19, 20, 23 to 27, 37, 40 to 45, 46 to 54, 56 to 69, 69(1), 72, 73 and 75 to 83; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 20, 26, 26(6), 55, 53, 70, 76, 79 and 185(3); Electricity Act, 1887; Electricity Act, 1903; Electricity Laws (Amendment) Act, 1998; Electricity Regulation Commission Act, 1998 - Sections 13, 22, 28 and 29; Electricity Reforms Act; Delhi Electricity Reforms Act, 2000 - Sections 3 to 11, 12, 14, 15, 19 to 27, 63 and 63(3); Companies Act, 1956; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1947; Bureau of Indian Sta

Reported in : 126(2006)DLT49

mess. Various State Governments enacted Electricity Reforms Acts. In the Union Territory of Delhi, the Delhi Electricity Reforms Act, 2000 was promulgated on 23.11.2000.37. Vide Section 3 of the Delhi Electricity Reforms Act, 2000 the Delhi Electricity Regulatory … learned counsel for the petitioner, inter alia, urged:-a) Under the Indian Electricity Act, 1910, a consumer had a right to install a meter of his choice. The DERC (Performance Standards - Metering and Billing) Regulations, 2002, vide regulation … distribution transformers loading and thereby reduce their outages apart from providing useful information on consumption patterns for demand side management.9. ComputerisationCreation of comprehensive, up to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 26 2018

Justice k.s.puttaswamy(retd) Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-26-2018

Subject : Right to Information

applied is whether the law satisfies ‘public interest’. Nariman, J., on the other hand, pointed out that the Right to Information Act, 2005 has provided for personal information being disclosed to third parties subject to ‘larger public interest’ being satisfied. … encrypted immediately upon capture. The decryption key is with the UIDAI solely. Section 2(ze) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘IT Act’) which defines ‘secure systems’ and Section 2(w) of the Act, which … with Section 10 of CIDR (i) (ii) (iii) Section 2(l) read with Regulation 23 (iv) Section 2(v) (v) Section 3 (vi) Section 5 (vii) Section 6 (viii) Section 8 (ix) Section 9 (x) (xi) Sections 23 and 54

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 11 2023

S.Somanathan Pillai vs the State of Kerala,

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Apr-11-2023

amended by the Right to Information (Amendment) Act, 2019. Section 16(5) of the principal Act was amended by Section 3 of the Amendment Act as follows:- "3. In section 16 of the principal Act,-(a) in sub-section (1), for … to the Chief Secretary of the State.2. The grievance of the petitioners is that while Section16(5) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 ('the RTI Act', for short) provides that the salaries and allowances payable to and other terms and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 12 2010

Secretary General, Supreme Court of India Vs. Subhash Chandra Agarwal

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-12-2010

Subject : Right to information

Acts : Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 4(1), 6, 6(2), 6(3), 7, 8, 8(1), 10. 22 and 24; Government Act, 1978; Judicial Disclosure Responsibility Act, 2007; Human Rights Act, 1993; Representation of People Act, 1951; Official Secrets Act, 1923; Freedom of Information Act 2000; Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968; Indian Trusts Act - Sections 88; Environmental Information Regulations, 2004; Constitution of India - Articles 3, 10, 14, 19, 19(1), 21, 32, 121, 122, 123, 124, (7), 124(2), 124(5), 217, 217(1), 233 and 235

Reported in : 166(2010)DLT305; 2010(1)KarLJ472

hold Governments and their instrumentalities accountable to the governed?. The Act restricts the right to information to citizens (Section 3). An applicant seeking information does not have to give any reasons why he/she needs such information except such … petition filed by the Central Public Information Officer, Supreme Court of India (hereinafter, 'the CPIO') nominated under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (hereinafter, 'the Act') questioning correctness and legality of the order dated 6th January, 2009 of the CentralRights' (2nd Edition, Thomson, Sweet & Maxwell 2007) explains the holding requirement in the context of Freedom of Information Act, 2000 (UK), thus:'When information is 'held' by a public authorityFor the purposes of the Freedom of Information Act 2000,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 02 2018

Christian Louboutin Sas vs.nakul Bajaj & Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-02-2018

Subject : MRTP

on the CS (COMM) 344/2018 Page 37 of 59 application for a temporary injunction, virtually foreclosed the plaintiffs’ right to prove if and how the knowledge threshold required by virtue of Section 79(3)(b) of the Information Technology Act, … Defendants’ use of the Plaintiff’s mark, logos and the Information image is protected under Section 79 of Technology Act, 2000?. b) Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to relief, and if so, in what terms?. E-commerce platforms and their

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 10 2016

Tata Sky Ltd Vs. Youtube Llc and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-10-2016

Subject : Intellectual Property

bound to protect. Please be advised that this is an offence under Section 66 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 read with Section 107 and 109 of the Indian Penal Code. 9. .. Therefore, you are required to … due speed, no later than 36 hours of receipt of this notice in terms of sub-section 4 of Section 3 of the Information Technology (Intermediaries Guidelines) Rules 2011." 13. On 8th January 2015, YouTube LLC replied to Tata … ) content, free of cost.This is illegal and violative of Tata Sky rights and the rights of the broadcasters who own the HD content broadcast

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 2016

State Bank of India and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra, through the S ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-22-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

explanation now that is introduced therein even an electronic record as per section 11 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, particularly attribution to electronic record would fall within this definition. The definition of the term 'immovable property' is … institutions in respect of those documents by which a right is created in their favour without affecting any right to collect it from the other party. Under the amended section 30A of the Maharashtra Stamp Act, further duty … 'mortgage deed' appearing in section 2(p), the word 'Schedule' as defined in section 2(s) and submits that by section 3 of the Act, the instruments chargeable with duty are set out. Chapter II, according to Mr. Tulzapurkar, has

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 16 2000

S. Bharat Kumar and Others Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-16-2000

Subject : ConstitutionElectricity

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 38(2), 45, 48, 200, 213, 226, 254 and 300-A; Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reforms Act, 1988 - Sections 3, 5, 9(2), 10(7), 11(3), 12, 21(2), 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 23(4), 25(5), 26(7), 28, 29, 30, 31, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44 and 54(2); Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reforms (Transfer Scheme) Rules, 1999 - Rules 4, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10; Electricity Supply Act, 1948 - Sections 3(1), 49, 57-A, 76 and 78-A; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 52; Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998 - Sections 18 and 19; Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission (Conduct of Business) Regulations, 1999

Reported in : 2000(6)ALD217; 2000(6)ALT1

Matched in: Citation 2000(6)ALD217; 2000(6)ALT1

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial