Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: right to information act 2000 section 2 · Page 1 of about 22,919 results (0.278 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 28 2005

Shivanna Naik Vs. Bangalore University, Jnana Bharathi and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-28-2005

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Karnataka Right to Information Act (RTI), 2000 - Sections 2; Karnataka State Universities Act, 1976 - Sections 2(9) and 3; Karnataka State Universities (Amendment) Act, 1987; Constitution of India - Article 12; Bangalore University Regulations

Reported in : ILR2005KAR5747; 2006(1)KarLJ113

respondent, submitted an application requisition the respondent to furnish the details' as per the provisions of the Karnataka Right to Information Act, 2000, which application has been rejected on the ground that there is no provision to furnish the documents under … 12 of the Constitution of India and also falls under the definition of Public Authority as defined under Section 2(c) of the Karnataka Right to Information Act, 2000. In support of his submission he has also relied

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 26 2018

Justice k.s.puttaswamy(retd) Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-26-2018

Subject : Right to Information

applied is whether the law satisfies ‘public interest’. Nariman, J., on the other hand, pointed out that the Right to Information Act, 2005 has provided for personal information being disclosed to third parties subject to ‘larger public interest’ being satisfied. … encrypted immediately upon capture. The decryption key is with the UIDAI solely. Section 2(ze) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘IT Act’) which defines ‘secure systems’ and Section 2(w) of the Act, which

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 22 2001

Well Pack Packaging Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Decided on : May-22-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2003)78TTJ(Ahd.)448

is an appeal by the assessee against the order dt. 21st Sept., 2000 passed by the CIT(A), XIII, Ahmedabad.2. Briefly the facts as emerging from … CIT (1991) 191 ITR 647 (SC), two conditions are required to be satisfied viz. (a) mere extinguishment of rights does not result in transfer, and (b) there must be existence of assets at the time of transfer … ratio to the extent of Rs. 128.14 lakhs. These facts are apparent from the copies of the auditors report pp. 5 to 7 of the paper book furnished to us.7.3. Subsequently, on conversion of firm into a … Rs. 1,93,930. This return was processed under Section 143(1)(a) of the IT Act, on 29th Jan., 1996, and the returned income stood accepted. Thereafter, the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 07 2001

Telemecanique and Controls (i) Limited Vs. Schneider Electric Industri ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-07-2001

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 64, 68, 83, 90 and 107; Patents Rules, 1972 - Rules 73 and 74; Designs Act, 1911 - Sections 2(5); Designs (Amendment) Act, 2000 - Sections 2; Indian Law

Reported in : 94(2001)DLT865

suit and it is thus claimed that apart from the fact that respondent has failed to establish its right to sue, the concealment of material fact and the inconsistent stand of the respondent itself should disentitle the respondent … parties, several agreements were executed including an agreement for supply of technical information and an agreement for technical services. Both these agreements were executed on … is in substance a mere mechanical device. It is stated that the position remains the same under Designs Act, 2000 in terms of Section 2(d). This plea is being opposed by Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, learned senior counsel for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 12 2010

Secretary General, Supreme Court of India Vs. Subhash Chandra Agarwal

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-12-2010

Subject : Right to information

Acts : Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 4(1), 6, 6(2), 6(3), 7, 8, 8(1), 10. 22 and 24; Government Act, 1978; Judicial Disclosure Responsibility Act, 2007; Human Rights Act, 1993; Representation of People Act, 1951; Official Secrets Act, 1923; Freedom of Information Act 2000; Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968; Indian Trusts Act - Sections 88; Environmental Information Regulations, 2004; Constitution of India - Articles 3, 10, 14, 19, 19(1), 21, 32, 121, 122, 123, 124, (7), 124(2), 124(5), 217, 217(1), 233 and 235

Reported in : 166(2010)DLT305; 2010(1)KarLJ472

petition filed by the Central Public Information Officer, Supreme Court of India (hereinafter, 'the CPIO') nominated under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (hereinafter, 'the Act') questioning correctness and legality of the order dated 6th January, 2009 of the CentralRights' (2nd Edition, Thomson, Sweet & Maxwell 2007) explains the holding requirement in the context of Freedom of Information Act, 2000 (UK), thus:'When information is 'held' by a public authorityFor the purposes of the Freedom of Information Act 2000, … be asserted and maintained within the meaning of the expression defined in Section 2(j) of the Act. Equally important are the questions requiring interpretation of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 31 2001

Virendra Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and Others

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-31-2001

Subject : Service

Acts : Rajasthan Police Subordinate Services Rules, 1989 - Rules 13 and 15; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 147, 307, 323, 324 and 341; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 3 and 25; Probation of Offenders Act, 1958

Reported in : 2001(4)WLN72

a deliberate attempt had been made by the appellant-petitioners to conceal the facts and that they have no right to conceal the fact of their involvement in any criminal case if so required by the recruiting agency.Virendra Singh … had concealed the fact and he had given application form with wrong information. Against Column No. 17 of the Column No. 17, the appellant had … had not attained the age of eighteen years - It is with the enactment of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2000, that in Section 2(k) a juvenile or child was defined to mean a child who had not completed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 05 2016

Delhi Jal Board Vs. Dalbir Singh Rawat

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-05-2016

Subject : Education

the aforesaid Act. The petitioner has now produced some documents which he has obtained under the provisions of Right to Information Act, which inter alia, disclose that reservation had been provided by the respondent for physically handicapped persons way back … was physically handicapped. The respondent was promoted vide order dated 18th April, 2000 and given a posting. However, after more than two years, vide order … vacancies. According to the instructions in this Department sO.M. No. 1/1/70-Estt. (SCT), dated 25-7-1970, (See Order 32 under Section 2) in the case of direct recruitment, whether by examination or otherwise, if sufficient number of Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 10 2016

S.M.M. Mohideen Wakf-Alal-Aulab Vs. M/s. Hindustan Petroleum Corporati ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-10-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

guideline value of the demised land as furnished by the Sub Registrar in response to an application under Right to Information Act, filed by the Muthavalli of the lessor Wakf. The other documents are primarily in the nature of sale … Wakf is based on approximation and probability. 13. Learned counsel for HPCL relied on the judgment reported in 2000 (2) CTC 555 (The Executive Director vs. Sarat Chandra Bisoi) regarding comparison of land value based on transactions … let in. Learned counsel for lessor Wakf would draw my attention to Section 2(12) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC for brevity), which

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 15 2009

Court on Its Own Motion Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-15-2009

Subject : CivilLabour and Industrial

Acts : Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986 - Sections 3, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12 and 13; Delhi Shops and Establishment Act, 1954; Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children ) Act, 2000 - Sections 2K; Child Justice (Care and Protection) Act - Sections 23, 24 and 26; Minimum Wages Act, 1948; Motor Transport Workers Act, 1961; Factory Act, 1948; Interstate Migrant Workmen (Regulation of Employment and Condition of Services) Act, 1979; Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act and Rules, 1976; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 331, 370 and 374; Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Rules, 1976; Constitution of India - Articles 23, 24, 39, 45 and 47

Reported in : 163(2009)DLT641

and actual rescue stage. The pre-rescue plan deals with as to how information is to be collected, verified and as to the composition of the … essence implement CLPRA, 1986, Delhi Shops and Establishment Act, 1954, Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children ) Act, 2000 and the Bonded Labour System (Abolition ) Act, 1976.10. One of the objectives of the Area Based Approach … this Court, vide a detailed order dated 24th September, 2008 directed the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (hereinafter referred to as National Commission.), to formulate a detailed Action Plan for strict enforcement and implementation of … owners/employers of the child labour as per provision of Indian Penal Code Section 331, 370, 374 and 34 as well as provisions of Section 23, … labour and to effectuate the mandate of Articles 23, 24, 39, 45 and 47 of the Constitution,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 2006

Farrukhabad GramIn Bank Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Agra

Decided on : Feb-23-2006

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)103ITD207Agra

that the nature of the fund is for cleansing the balance sheet, i.e., cleansing the non-performing assets, but right to use the infused funds cannot be treated as equity since the procedure prescribed under the Act has not … the orders passed by both the lower authorities below are without appreciating the facts, various submissions, explanation and information submitted by the appellant from time to time which ought to have been considered before passing the impugned … case of Farrukhabad Grameen Bank, Fathegarh in Appeal No. 54/CIT(A)-l/Ward-I/Farrukhabad/1999-2000 dt.29th Feb., 2000 (supra) for asst. yr. 1998-99 has held as under: In the present … erred on facts and in law by holding that the deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the IT Act, 1961 is not allowable in respect of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial