Advanced Search Results

Shivanna Naik Vs. Bangalore University, Jnana Bharathi and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Karnataka Right to Information Act (RTI), 2000 - Sections 2; Karnataka State Universities Act, 1976 - Sections 2(9) and 3; Karnataka State Universities (Amendment) Act, 1987; Constitution of India - Article 12; Bangalore University Regulations

Reported in : ILR2005KAR5747; 2006(1)KarLJ113

12 of the Constitution of India and also falls under the definition of Public Authority as defined under Section 2(c) of the Karnataka Right to Information Act, 2000. In support of his submission he has also relied … respondent, submitted an application requisition the respondent to furnish the details' as per the provisions of the Karnataka Right to Information Act, 2000, which application has been rejected on the ground that there is no provision to furnish the documents under

Court on Its Own Motion Vs. Dept. of Women and Child Development and O ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

due to sheer negligence, omission or even deliberately. In support of this plea, it is mentioned that under Right to Information Act, 2005, information was received by the applicant from Central Jail No.7 which discloses that during the period October, … of the Constitution of India; contrary to the provisions of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as the JJ Act) apart from adverse psychological impact on these children. Obviously such a … the concerned Magistrates. (iii) Attention of the Magistrate is also drawn to Section 7 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of the Children) Act, … concepts to be purported by national courts. As long ago as in 1215, the English magna carta provided that, “No free man shall be taken

Chairman and Managing Director and Another Vs. Commodore Vijay Kumar G ...

Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC UT Chandigarh

Subject : Land Acquisition

or not on account of the fact that the complainant had already resorted to the remedy under the Right to Information Act, 2005. It may be stated here, that under Section 3 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, additional remedy … trade practice. When the grievance of the complainant, was not redressed, left with no alternative, a complaint under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter to be called as the Act only), was filed, directing the

Sat Pal Kansal Vs. Estate Officer

Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC UT Chandigarh

Subject : MRTP

passed in 1991-92 alongwith the plan of House No.403, Sector 30-A, Chandigarh, vide application dated 31.08.2009, under the Right to Information Act, 2005. When no information and documents were supplied, Sh.Inder Chand Aggarwal was compelled to file an appeal, before … trade practice. When the grievance of the complainant, was not redressed, left with no alternative, a complaint under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter to be called as the Act only), was filed, directing the

Subhash Popatlal Dave Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Right to Information Act, 2005 - Section 3, 2(e), 8(h), 24; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 32, 14, 19, 21, 22; Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974. ; Human Rights Act

grounds enumerated in the judgment, was no longer good law on account of the subsequent enactment of the Right to Information Act, 2005, here in after referred to as the "R.T.I. Act", which came into force on 15th June, 2005.A … Harchandai and Suresh Hotwani, the grounds of detention had been provided to the deten uunder the provisions of Section 3 of the aforesaid Act.Learned counsel submitted that the only prohibition to the grant of information has been … the arrest of the detenu and subsequent release on bail more than 12 years before the offence in respect of which detention orders had been

National Insurance Company Limited Vs. M/S. Mrh Associates and Another

Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC UT Chandigarh

Subject : MRTP

to 05.01.2013. 3. It was further stated that when information was sought from Opposite Party No.2, under the Right to Information Act, 2005, with regard to the driving licence of Sukhwinder Singh, it (Opposite Party No.2) vide Annexure C-5, informed … trade practice. When the grievance of the complainant, was not redressed, left with no alternative, a complaint under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter to be called as the Act only), was filed, directing the

Sugar (Deceased) (Represented by Fiona Paveley) Vs. British Broadcasti ...

Court : UK Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

which the appellant so strongly relies: Matky. The complainant there was seeking, against the background of a general right to information under the Czech legal system, access to documentation concerning the construction of a new nuclear power station and … 1. Although the British Broadcasting Corporation ("the BBC") is listed as a public authority in the Freedom of Information Act 2000, the Act, as I will call it, applies to the BBC only to a limited extent. The words … 2005 Mr Sugar applied to the Information Commissioner ("the Commissioner") pursuant to section 50 (1) of the Act for a decision whether the BBC had … number of its recommendations had already been implemented. C: THE FORENSIC HISTORY 12. Mr Sugar was a respected solicitor and a supporter of the State

Registrar General of the High Court of Madras Vs. K.U.Rajasekar

Court : Chennai

Subject : Right to Information

ab initio, because of the fact that the said orders are in negation of the provisions of the Right to Information Act, 2005. 4.The Learned Counsel for the Petitioner urges before this Court that the impugned orders, dated 02.07.2012, have … UK, the Director in the office of the Government Information Service, an authority created under the Freedom of Information Act, 2000 possesses a degree of law and has been a member of the Bar of the District of Columbia … has observed as under:3. The Petitioner has preferred the first appeal under Section 19(1) to the appellate authority on 30.06.2011. The appellate authority has furnished … the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner/High Court relies on the order dated 12.02.2010 passed by this Court between N.Velayutham and another v. The Registrar, Tamil

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Mangalam Cement Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2005)92TTJ(JP.)1

certainty and predictability in the administration of justice. Persons affected by decisions of Tribunals or Courts have a right to expect that those exercising judicial functions will follow the reason or ground of the judicial decision in the … synopsis of their arguments. From the submissions made, it was found that both the parties have furnished further information on which certain clarifications were required. The case was accordingly re-fixed for hearing and parties were directed to … own case in ITA No. 1584/Jp/1993 for asst. yr. 1992-93 dt.16th June, 2000, in which one of us, the learned JM was also a party, … (1985) 155 ITR 120 (SC). It has also been contended that the activity did not amount to expansion of existing business as the assessee has … The assessee has also claimed separate deduction under Section 80-1 which was not considered by the Tribunal. … Union of India and Ors. (1985) 155 ITR 120 (SC). It has also been contended that the

Manoj Oswal Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Sr.P.i and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Right to Information

alleging offences punishable under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000. 4 The complaint alleges that one Prataprao Govindrao Pawar is Chairman of M/s Sakal Papers Private Limited. This … principle that just as every citizen is guaranteed freedom of speech and expression, every citizen also has a right to protect his reputation, which is regarded as a property. Hence, nobody can so use his freedom of speech … of Maharashtra. He also runs a helpline for animals that rescues around 1200 animals a year. 8 It is alleged that the Information Technology Act,