Advanced Search Results

Leela Dhundiraj Divekar Vs. E.C. Shinde and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Suits Valuation Act, 1887 - Sections 8 and 9; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 72, 77 and 78; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 15; Bombay City Civil Court Act, 1948 - Sections 3; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 8; Registration Act, 1877 - Sections 77; Limitation Act, 1877 - Sections 6 and 7; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 417 and 417(3); Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 5 and 29(2); Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Schedule - Article 55

Reported in : AIR1970Bom109; (1969)71BOMLR305; 1969MhLJ487

is a suit filed by one of the executants of a document under Section 77 of the Indian Registration Act, 1908, for a decree directing the Defendants, who are the appropriate registering authorities, to register the document in question

Appourva J.Patel. Vs. the Inspector General of Registration and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Acts : Registration Act, 1908 - Section 73, 74, 36, 34(1), 35(3), 36, 77; Tamil Nadu Stamp (Prevention of Under-valuation of Instruments) Rules 1968 - Rule 3(1-A); Constitution of India - Articles 226; Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Section 2(12); Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 68, 70, 71

should proceed with further action.(iv) Thereafter, the third respondent filed an appeal purportedly under Section 73 of the Registration Act, 1908, as against the order dated 21.10.2010 passed by the second respondent under Section 36 of the Act. Taking … an ordinary suit in a Civil Court. But neither the Registrar nor the Court in a suit under Section 77, Registration Act, has jurisdiction to enter into these questions."14. In David Yule vs. Ram Khelawan Sahai {6 CWN

N.M. Palanimuthu Vs. the Commissioner Hr and Ce (Admn.) Dept. and Five ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesLimitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 -- Sections 2 to 24 and 29(2); Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 -- Sections 3, 63, 69, 70, 108 and 115, /Amended by Act, 1996; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 -- Sections 9 and 80; Registration Act, 1908 -- Sections 77(1); Registration Act, 1877 -- Sections 77 and 76

Reported in : 1999(1)CTC534

a plaint.4. I find more or less a similar suit is provided for under Section 77 of the Registration Act, 1908 against the order of the Registrar refusing to order the document to be registered. Under Section 77(1) of

Hira Singh and anr. Vs. Budh Singh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ContractCivil

Acts : Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 77; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 20 and 32; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100

Reported in : AIR1985All259

no relief for registration as sought by plaintiffs, was awardable by the civil Court. Under Section 72(1) of Registration Act, 1908 in case of refusal by Sub-Registrar refusing to admit a document to registration, an appeal could have lain … the Registrar. It was not for the civil Court to give redress to plaintiffs in such cases under Section 77 of the aforesaid Act, it was further argued that had this been a suit for specific performance, proper

Amar Singh Vs. Baliram Singh

Court : Patna

Subject : PropertyContract

Acts : Specific Relief Act - Sections 20; Indian Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 23, 24, 25, 26, 36, 37, 72, 75, 75(2), 75(3), 76 and 77; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100

contract.9. The learned Advocate of the appellant further submitted that another remedy was available to the plaintiff under Section 77 of the Registration Act to file suit in the Civil court for getting the sale deed registered if … sue for specific performance of contract and as such, the suit is barred under the provision of the Registration Act, 1908.10. On the other hand, the submission of the learned Advocate of the respondent is that although it is

Yanala Malleshwari and ors. Vs. Ananthula Sayamma and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Indian Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17 to 22, 17(1), 17(2), 23A, 32, 32A, 34, 35, 49, 58, 59, 60, 60(2), 61, 61(2), 69, 71, 72 and 77; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 4, 5 to 34, 38 to 53A, 54 to 57, 59, 107, 123 and 126; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 13, 15, 17, 21, 31, 31(2), 33, 34 and 49; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 23, 25, 29 and 65; Evidence Act - Sections 73; Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 35; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 18, 34, 39 and 41; Indian Registration Act, 1866; Indian Registration Act, 1871; Indian Registration Act, 1877; Registration and Other Related Laws (Amendment) Act, 2001; West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 - Sections 4B; Andhra Pradesh Stamp (Amendment) Act, 1922; General Clau

Reported in : 2006(6)ALT523; 2007(1)CTC97; AIR2007AP57; 2007(2)AIRKarR382(FB)

V.V.S. Rao, J.PART - IINTRODUCTION:1. Almost a century old Registration Act, 1908, which came into force on 01.01.1909, after about fifteen amendments, has now thrown up sea-saw situation played by … if the appeal is also rejected, the remedy to an aggrieved person is to file a suit under Section 77 of the Registration Act for a decree directing the document to be registered by the registering officer.59. When

Nawab Ali and anr. Vs. Smt. Ram Murti Devi

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 35, 77 and 77(1)

Reported in : AIR1984All325

M. Lal Additional Civil Judge, Moradabad.2. Smt. Ram Murti Devi, plaintiff-respondent, filed suit under Section 77 of the Registration Act, 1908, and prayed for issue of a direction to the Sub-Registrar, Amroha to register the sale deed executed by

Smt. Basanti Devi and ors. Vs. Girdhari Rana and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Contract

Acts : Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 49 and 77; Specific Relief Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100; Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : 2007(2)BLJR2858; [2007(3)JCR620(Jhr)]

respondent on the ground that the respondent had to avail of the remedy under Section 77 of the Registration Act, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') and not bring a suit for specific performance. The matter was carried

Kalavakurti Venkata Subbaiah Vs. Bala Gurappagari Guruvi Reddy

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ContractCivil

Acts : Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 23-26, 32, 49, 72, 73, 76 and 77;Specific Relief Act, 1963; Constitution of India - Article 136; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 92

Reported in : AIR1999SC2958; JT1999(5)SC389; 1999(2)MPLJ302; RLW1999(3)SC445; 1999(4)SCALE466; (1999)7SCC114; [1999]Supp1SCR75

the respondent on the ground that the respondent had to avail the remedy under Section 77 of the Registration Act, 1908 [hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'] and not bring a suit for specific performance. The matter was carried

Veranna Veerabhadrappa Vs. the District Registrar and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 80 and 100; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 70 and 77(1); Karnataka (Restriction on Transfer) Act, 1991 - Sections 3, 4 and 8

Reported in : AIR2005Kant27; ILR2004KAR4699; 2004(7)KarLJ646

the order passed by the Appellate Authority refusing to register under Section 70 of the Registration Act.; (B) REGISTRATION ACT, 1908- SECTION 70 - REGISTRATION OF A DOCUMENT UNDER - Whether the Registering Authority can refuse to register the documents … District Registrar, Dharwar who agreeing with the Sub-Registrar dismissed the appeal and hence the suit as provided under Section 77(1) of the Registration Act was filed.4. Even though the defendants - respondents appeared before the Trial Court and