Advanced Search Results

Kadiam Paparao Vs. Siddireddy Satyanarayana and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 33; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 75 and 75(4)

Reported in : AIR1983AP257

admissibility of evidence - Section 33 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 and Sections 75 and 75 (4) of Registration Act, 1908 - whether evidence of witness before Registrar in enquiry under Section 75 (4) admissible in subsequent suit -

Nandigam Ramarao and ors. Vs. Burugupalli Srikrishnamurthi and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 82; Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920 - Sections 6, 9, 9(1), 53 and 54; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 47 and 75

Reported in : AIR1962AP226

6, 9, 9 (1), 53 and 54 of Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920 and Sections 47 and 75 of Registration Act, 1908 - transfer of property made by insolvent challenged on ground that transfer made to defeat creditors - petition … . Thereupon, the plaintiffs filed O.S. No. 51/53 on the file of the District Court. West Godavari under Section 75 of the Registration Act for compulsory registration of Ex. A-1 In that suit again the 2nd defendant pleaded

Kuppa Goundar Vs. Joint Sub-registrar, Iii, Salem and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Acts : Indian Registration Act - Sections 36, 73 and 75(4); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 16, Rule 14

Reported in : AIR1960Mad401; (1959)2MLJ63

of the petitioner. The writ petition fails and is dismissed.(10) Writ petition dismissed. Indian Registration Act (XVI of 1908), Section 75(4)--Scope of--Compulsory registration of document--Enquiry--Sub-Registrar on his own initiative summoning witness--Validity of--Applicability of Order XVI, Rule 4 of … Sub-Registrar III, Salem, claiming compulsory registration of a mortgage document dated 12-2-1959 under S. 73 of the Indian Registration Act. His case was that the mortgage document was executed by on Ellappa Gounder and his brother, Kuppa Gounder

Shiv Charan Das and ors. Vs. Rukmani Devi and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 73, 73(1), 74 and 75; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 12, 12(2) and 12(3)

Reported in : AIR1975All354

with costs to the respondents. Property - registration of sale deed - Sections 73, 74 and 75 of Registration Act, 1908 - Registrar not a Court - hence benefit under Section 12 of Limitation Act, 1963 not applicable -

Badhri NaraIn Singh Vs. Kodo Sah

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Property

Reported in : 28Ind.Cas.138

plaintiff did really execute this kobula. Apparently registration of this kobala was directed under Section 75 of the Registration Act, 1908, and it is argued that the effect of that order of registration was to throw the whole burden

T. Paramasivam Vs. N. Babu and A. Velu Udayar

Court : Chennai

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Indian Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 47, 47K, 75 and 75(3); Stamp Act - Sections 35; Tamil Nadu Registration Act, 1908; Limitation Act - Sections 5; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 13, Rule 1 - Order 20, Rule 12 - Order 41, Rule 27 and 27(1)

Reported in : 2008(4)CTC507; (2008)5MLJ68

plaintiff presented the document before the District Registrar, Villupuram, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Indian Registration Act, 1908. After accepting the petition presented by the plaintiff in Petition No. 5/93, the District Registrar, Villupuram, had issued … the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant is that both Sections 47 and Clause 3 of Section 75 of the Act should be read together and while doing so, the only meaning that could emerge from

Gangaram Ranaba Vs. Datto Appaji Powar and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Indian Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 32, 35, 58, 59, 60, 73, 75, 75(1), 75(2) and 75(3)

Reported in : AIR1956Bom328; (1956)58BOMLR161; ILR1956Bom258

within thirty days after the making of the registrar's order under Sub-Section (1) of Section 75 of the Registration ACt, 1908, the sub-registrar cannot refuse the registration and is bound to register it - - 1 and 2 on

Mohinder Kaur Vs. Gurcharan Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Civil

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 47 and 75

Reported in : AIR2004P& H188; (2004)137PLR401

even then it would be of no consequence in view of the provisions of Section 47 of the Registration Act, 1908. Section 47 of the said Act provides that a registered document shall operate from the time from which it … Mohinder Kaur could not be held to be illegal and void. It has further been submitted that under Section 75(3) of the Registration Act, 1908, the registration of the sale deed in favour of the plaintiffs shall take

A.G. Gopal Vs. The Chief Secretary cum Vigilance Commissioner, Chennai ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Indian Evidence Act, 1872 that all official acts were performed in accordance with the procedure prescribed under the Registration Act, 1908. In fact, the burden is on the prosecuting agency to establish that an individual had abutted in committing … 1908 - Section 32, Section 34, Section 35, Section 68, Section 68(2), Section 69, Section 73, Section 74, Section 75, Section 77, Section 81 - Criminal action -Petitioner sought to direct Respondent to initiate criminal action against accused,

The Collector of Moradabad as Manager Vs. M. Maqbul-ul-rahman and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 45Ind.Cas.37

the 3rd of February 1912 a special power-of-attorney of the kind spoken of in Section 33 of the Registration Act (No. XVI of 1908) was registered at the office of the Sub Registrar of Moradabad, whereby the mortgagee … make it. The proceedings before the Registrar resulted in an order by him, under the first Clause of Section 75 of Act XVI of 1908, whereby he ordered the document to be registered. In the meantime the estate