Advanced Search Results

Sh Deepak Kaushik vs Vinod Kaushik & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Family Arrangement dated 10.10.2009 was therefore, compulsorily required to be registered, in terms of Section 17 of the Registration Act, 1908. Inthe absence of Registration, the said Family Arrangement cannot be taken as evidence in terms of Section49 of … in regard to issuance of NOC in respect of the SuitProperty.The Plaintiff had also filed a Suit for Partition, in the learnedRevenue Court, in respect of the Suit Property, which was dismissed by the SDM on 17.05.2018,

M/s N.n. Global Mercantile Private Limited Vs. M/s Indo Unique Flame L ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

with a document, which is compulsorily registerable but which is not registered. Under Section 49 78 of the Registration Act, 1908, an unregistered document may be used for proving a collateral transaction. Even this is impermissible, if the document … of which the parties have made an agreement referred to in section 44, shall, at the request of one of the parties or any person … QUESTION UNDER THE CAPTION ‘VALIDITY OF AN ARBITRATION AGREEMENT IN AN UNSTAMPED AGREEMENT’................................................... 5 D. SUBMISSION OF THE PARTIES ....................................................................................................... 15 E. ANALYSIS ....................................................................................................................................... 29 F. THE ACT ......................................................................................................................................... 30 G. WHAT LED TO THE INSERTION OF

Sundarsons and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Registration Act, 1996 - Sections 17, 17(1), 22, 22A, 23, 24, 25, 26, 32, 32A, 33, 34, 35, 41, 43, 45, 49, 58 to 61, 69, 75, 77, 88, 89 and 66; Co-operative Societies Act; Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 154; Registration (Amendment) Act, 1968 - Sections 69; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 66; Stamp Act, 1899 - Schedule - Article 28; Contract Act; Power of Attorney Act; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 49 and 54; Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 - Sections 29(3); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 162, 226 and 246; Maharashtra Registration Rules, 1961 - Rules 24 and 44; Bombay Land Revenue Rules, 1921 - Rules 42, 43 and 44

Reported in : 2008(4)ALLMR841; 2008(5)BomCR85; 2008(6)MhLj332

State, Pune had issued Notification dated 27.6.2006 under the powers conferred upon him by Section 69 of the Registration Act, 1908 and whereby he had incorporated the amendment to Rule 24 of the Maharashtra Registration Rules, 1961 and after … Affidavit in Reply proceeded on the footing that under the amended Rule 44 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Rules, the registration of document would be … in respect of Writ Petition No. 1569 of 2007 are mentioned herein. The petitioner No. 1 is a partnership firm and the petitioner Nos. 2 to 5 are the partners of the petitioner No. 1 petitioner No.

R.G. Lakhmidas and Co. Vs. Sir Dorab Tata

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyContract

Reported in : AIR1927Bom195; (1927)29BOMLR19; 101Ind.Cas.229

is whether the purchasers can recover their deposit inasmuch as the contract was not registered under the Indian Registration Act, 1908. No such point was taken in the Court below. It was not to the interest of either party … and 5. In re Jackson and Woodburn's Contract (1887) 37 Ch. D. 44 may be cited in support of questions Nos. 2 and 3, and … to the defendants, and (2) whether the defendants should be ordered to specifically perform the agreement between the parties.2. Under Rules 212 and 220 the procedure in force on the Original' Bide with reference to such summonses

N.C. Rangesh and Others Vs. Inspector General of Registration and Othe ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 230A, 269UA, 269UC, 269UL, 269UL(1) and 269U-O

Reported in : (1990)84CTR(Mad)241; [1991]189ITR270(Mad); (1991)IMLJ233

10 lakhs, that section 269UC clearly supersedes the provisions of the Transfer of Property Act and the Indian Registration Act, 1908, that the said circular dated May 29, 1989, clothed with powers under the Registration Act, 1908, interferes with … into an agreement individually and has paid an advance of Rs.1,001 and the sale consideration agreed by the parties in each transaction exceeds rupees one lakh. 3. The petitioner in W.P. No. 1389 of 1990 purchased a

Bhupendra Singh Vs. Board of Revenue U P

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

Sale issued by the Official Liquidator, when it is sought to be filed under Section 89 of the Registration Act, 1908. After holding so, the learned Judge pointed out that the law as it stands today is unfair to … in a Madras case Rama Sahu v. Gowro Ratho [ ILR (1921) 44 Mad 55] and by MacLeod, C.J., in a Bombay case Dawal v. … Counsel. 2. THIS petition has been filed for quashing the orders dated 12.2.1992 and 26.9.1988 passed by opposite parties no.1 and 2 respectively. The facts in short giving rise to the present dispute are that the petitioner

Relangi Nageswara Rao and Another Vs. Tatha Chiranjeeva Rao (Died) by ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : TenancyCivil

Acts : Indian Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 10(2), 17 and 49; Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960 - Sections 22; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1860 - Sections 151 - Order 7, Rule 7; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 4, 53-A, 54, 106, 107 and 111; Indian Registration Act, 1866; Indian Registration Act, 1871; Indian Registration Act, 1877; Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1)

Reported in : 2000(5)ALD577; 2000(5)ALT561

it is not registered and that it is required to be registered compulsorily under Section 17(1) of the Registration Act, 1908. The lower Court held that Ex.A1 was properly proved, but the question was whether it is compulsorily registered … was expressed in a Madras Case Rama Sahu v. Gowro Ratho, ILR 44 Mad 55 = AIR 1921 Mad 337 FB and by Mac Lead, … RCC No.8 of 1984 and the appellants in CMA No.3 of 1995. For the sake of convenience, the parties as arrayed before the Rent Controller are referred to herein.3. The petitioner laid a claim before the learned

The Inspector General of Registration, Pattinapakkam, Chennai and Anot ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

Subject : Land Acquisition

judgment dated 13.08.2014, reported in 2014 (6) CTC 13, the learned Judge went into the provisions of the Registration Act, 1908 and the Rules framed thereunder and came to the conclusion that the Circular was ultra vires the Act … of the commissions for the agent, then the agency was not irrevocable. 44. Therefore, in cases where a Principal dies after creating a power that … as the first one. A Division Bench of this Court, to which one of us (VRSJ) was a party, dismissed the writ petition by an order dated 13.06.2014, pointing out the public interest sought to be protected

Manik Majumder Vs. Dipak Kumar Saha (d) Thr. Lrs.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

produced. The learned trial Judge also came to the conclusion that the provisions of Section 33(1)(c) of the Registration Act, 1908 have not been complied with, when according to the plaintiffs the alleged PoA was executed at Kumilla, East … That original plaintiff No.2 allegedly constructed a godown at the rear end of the grocery shop in another part of ‘Schedule A’ property (‘Schedule C’ property). It was the case on behalf of the plaintiffs that 2 … the endorsement, referred to in Section 59 have occurred as therein mentioned.” 44 Sections 67 and 85 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, reads as

The Sub Registrar Amudalavalasa Vs. M/s Dankuni Steels Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

or development of Industries. NOTIFICATION - II In exercise of the pówers conferred under Section 78 of the Registration Act, 1908 (Central Act XVI of 1908), the Governor of Andhra Pradesh hereby makes the following amendment to the "Table … in C.A. No.1202 of 2004 as stated in Clause E (supra), we may notice the prayers and relevant part of the order. They read as under: “Application under Section of the Companies Act, 1956 R/W Rule 9 … factory. It was found that the machineries were immovable property which were 44 permanently attached to the earth. Para 8 of the said judgment reads