Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: registration act 1908 part 27 · Page 1 of about 2,771 results (0.119 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 09 2017

Vijay Kumar Taneja vs.raj Kumar Taneja and Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-09-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

without a registered document. With effect from the amendment of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and the Registration Act, 1908 in September, 2001, no rights by way of part performance also in immovable property can be created without … daughters and sons of Late Sh. Jugal Kishore Taneja. (ii) That Sh. Jugal Kishore Taneja died intestate on 27th February, 1997 leaving the plaintiff and the six defendants as his only legal heirs. (iii) That during his

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 17 2003

Dattaprasad Co-operative Housing Society Limited and ors. Vs. State of ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-17-2003

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 - Sections 38; Karnataka Co-operative Societies (Amendment) Act of 2001; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17(1) and 17(2); Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 - Sections 68 - Schedule - Article 20(1) and 20(2); Co-operative Societies Act, 1912 - Sections 27; Constitution of India - Articles 246 and 254

Reported in : ILR2004KAR1892; 2004(3)KarLJ310

has exempted the Co-operative Societies from the application of provisions of Section 17(1)(b) and (c) of the Indian Registration Act, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Registration Act') for compulsory registration of the documents and payment of stamp duty … transfer of shares is enjoying the privilege of occupation of the apartment/flat. There is no transfer of any part of immovable properties which vests in the Society. However, transfer of shares creates interest in the apartment attached … of unamended Section 38 of the KCS Act verbatim incorporated from Section 27 of the Central Co-operative Societies Act, 1912 (hereinafter referred to as the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 09 2011

S.M.Syed Mohammed Buhari Vs. the Sub Registrar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-09-2011

Subject : Civil

Acts : Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17, 71 to 76; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 2; Indian Evidence Act, 1872; Constitution of India - Article 226; Registration Rules - Rule 55

his son can be permitted to be revoked by a subsequent registration of a Cancellation Deed under the Registration Act, 1908. (ii) Is the registering authority bound to register the Cancellation Deed or can go into the validity of … any title, the settlor cannot unilaterally cancel such a document which is impermissible in law. When once the parties come under the purview of the Registration Act, 1908, the provisions of the said Act alone would govern. … RAWTHER'S CHILDREN: ASSAN RAVTHER AND OTHERS vs. MANAHAPARA CHARAYIL [AIR 1972 KERALA 27] NASIB ALI vs. WAJED ALI [AIR 1927 CAL 197]” Analysis: 8.In order

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 02 1993

Mahadeo Nathuji Patil Vs. Surjabai Khushalchand Lakkad and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-02-1993

Subject : ContractProperty

Reported in : (1994)96BOMLR846

10 of the aforesaid Supplementary Amending Act, 1929, the proviso was introduced in Section 49 of the Indian Registration Act, 1908 in which it was provided that unregistered documents affecting immovable property and required by the said Act or … Section 53-A of the Transfer of Property Act (for short, 'the Act') to maintain one's possession derived through part performance. In the case of Nanasaheb reported in AIR 1957 Bom. 138, the Division Bench of this Court … barred by limitation if the right is destroyed, for example under Section 27 of the Act a suit for possession of any property becoming barred

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 20 1984

Nawab Ali and anr. Vs. Smt. Ram Murti Devi

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-20-1984

Subject : Civil

Acts : Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 35, 77 and 77(1)

Reported in : AIR1984All325

M. Lal Additional Civil Judge, Moradabad.2. Smt. Ram Murti Devi, plaintiff-respondent, filed suit under Section 77 of the Registration Act, 1908, and prayed for issue of a direction to the Sub-Registrar, Amroha to register the sale deed executed by … the shop wanted to eject Fida Ali and civil litigation took place between them. Ultimately all the concerned parties appointed Lala Ram Nath as an Arbitrator by an agreement dated 13-8-68 to settle the matters in dispute … certified copy of the sale deed of the shops is paper No. 27-C-l.10. The Additional Civil Judge did not record a clear and categorical finding

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 04 2014

Praneeta Soni Vs. Panchshila Hospitality Ventures Ltd. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-04-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

The lease deed between the parties dated 10.7.1995 is an un-registered lease deed. Section 49 of the Indian Registration Act, 1908 bars this Court from looking into the terms and conditions of an un-registered lease deed. Once the lease … the learned Trial Court failed to correctly appreciate the provisions of Section 27 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 and Section 114(e) of the Indian … from bringing on record her legal heirs was allowed and she was deleted from the array of the parties in the suit as defendant No.5 by order dated 4 th June, 2012 passed by the learned Trial

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 27 2026

Suganiya M Vs The District Registrar

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-27-2026

the total extent of six cents had been sub-divided. It is further submitted that section 22-A of the Registration Act, 1908 would not be applicable.3. The learned Government Advocate appearing for therespondents would submit that the subject property forms … would not be applicable.3. The learned Government Advocate appearing for therespondents would submit that the subject property forms part of an unapproved layout and unless proper approval is obtained from the competent authority, the document cannot be … BEFORE THE MADURAI BENGH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY W.P.(MD)No.1739 of 2026M.Suganiya ... Petitioner Vs 1.The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 14 1984

A-z (industrial) Premises Vs. Competent Authority, Iac

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-14-1984

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1985)12ITD451(Mum.)

'instrument of transfer' was further defined in Clause (f) to mean the instrument of transfer registered under the Registration Act, 1908, or the statement registered under Section 269AB of the Act with the competent authority. Reading Clauses (f) and … construction of buildings thereon, to be used as an industrial estate. The lessee entered into agreements with several parties ('the unit-holders'), for the sale to them of the different industrial units on the terms and conditions contained … been sold over a large span of time from April 1966 to 27-8-1970, i.e., a period well over four years. Even the last sale was

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 22 2013

Sh. Sushil Ansal Vs. Shri Charanjit Singh Sole Proprietor, Charmis Ent ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-22-2013

Subject : Education

The lease deed between the parties dated 10.7.1995 is an unregistered lease deed. Section 49 of the Indian Registration Act, 1908 bars this Court from looking into the terms and conditions of an unregistered lease deed. Once the lease … is not registered, the period stated therein viz the lease being of 27 years plus 7 years will also not come into operation and the … was filed pre-maturely and that according to the agreement dated 24 th December, 2004 entered into by the parties, the petitioner was a landlord under whom the respondent is a tenant since January, 2005 and that the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 09 2013

Sanjay Singh Vs. M/S Corporate Warranties Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-09-2013

Subject : Education

30.11.2009 in any case could not be admitted into evidence being compulsorily registrable under Section 17(1A) of the Registration Act, 1908 and being not registered; and (xii) that the respondent / plaintiff having by virtue of the Sale Deed … favour of the appellant / defendant for a sale consideration of Rs.3,90,00,000/- and the appellant / defendant in part performance of the said Agreement to Sell had paid a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- as advance to the said … defendant at a rent of Rs.30,000/- per month vide lease deed dated 27.11.2007 for a period of eleven months commencing from 10.12.2007 and ending on

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial