Advanced Search Results

Indian and General Investment Trust Ltd. Vs. Sri Ramchandra Mardaraja ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 13, 14, 44A, 44A(3) and 47; ; Orissa Money Lenders Act; ;Limitation Act - Schedule - Article 183

Reported in : AIR1952Cal508

by its judgments. In England this recognition of foreign judgments was at first based on the ground of reciprocity, that is to say, foreign' judgments were accepted at their face value in an action brought in England … made ...............'The summons is now served in accordance with the rules laid, down in the Courts (Emergency Powers) Act, 1943.30. It is argued that even from the point of view of Private International Law, an agreement to be … the Master of the Supreme Court of Judicature in England, granted under Section 10 of the Foreign judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) Act, 1933, together with the … respondent was directed to pay to the plaintiff trustees the sum of 58,434/16/4 and the taxed costs, the security to be released upon such payment,

Laxmichand and ors. Vs. Mst. Tipuri and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 13; International Law; Rajasthan High Court Ordinance, 1949; Rajasthan Civil Courts Ordinance, 1950; Rajasthan Small Cause Courts Ordinance, 1950; Constitution of India - Article 261

Reported in : AIR1956Raj81

of Federal Court in -- 'Jagannath. Baksh Singh v. United Provinces', AIR 1943 PC 29 (T). The point for consideration in that case was whether … the subordinate courts in Rajasthan are concerned, there is the Rajasthan Civil Courts Ordinance (No. VII) of 1950. Section 5 (1) of that Ordinance reads as follows--'Until other provision is made under or in pursuance of this Ordinance, … state certain propositions which may be taken to be equally undisputed.43. Two sovereign States may enter into a reciprocal arrangement providing for the execution of a decree passed by the court of one country in the territory … following observations at p. 185 sum up the legal position:'In a personal action, to which none of these causes of jurisdiction apply, a decree pronounced

Chunnilal Kasturchand Vs. Dundappa Damappa

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 13, 20 and 44 - Order 7, Rule 7 - Order 41, Rule 33

Reported in : AIR1951Bom190; (1950)52BOMLR660; ILR1950Bom640

had not submitted to the jurisdiction of the Court. It is well settled that even where there are reciprocity agreements under which decrees of Courts of one State are enforceable by Courts of another State, a judgment-debtor … Section 20(b), Civil P. C., to obtain leave of the Court to proceed against them. The cause of action also arose within the jurisdiction of the Belgaum Court, Defendant 5 remained absent, and the suit proceeded ex

Levinson Vs. Spector Motor Service

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

Bulletin No. 9, Wage and Hour Division, Office of the Administrator, November, 1943, 1944-1945 WH Man. 520, 523, as follows: "4. . . ." " … such activities. P. 330 U. S. 681 . 5. The scope of the power of the Commission … or routes in accordance with the laws of each State having jurisdiction; or (9) the casual, occasional, or reciprocal transportation of passengers of property in interstate or foreign commerce for compensation by any person not engaged in … COURT OF ILLINOIS Syllabus 1. The Interstate Commerce Commission "has power," under § 204 of the Motor Carrier Act, 1935, to establish qualifications and maximum hours of service with respect to a "checker" or "terminal foreman," a … of employees of interstate motor carriers depends upon an interpretation of that section in accordance with the purposes of the Motor Carrier Act and the

Chicago and N.W. R. Co. Vs. Transportation Union

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

change in agreements affecting rates of pay, rules, or working conditions. . . ." [ Footnote 2/2 ] Section 5 First, provides in part: "The parties, or either party, to a dispute between an employee or group of … the existing agreements to require not less than two brakemen on every freight and yard crew. The Railway reciprocated by serving upon the Union a § 6 notice requesting an agreement that would make crew size a … Petitioner railroad brought this suit (after formal procedures of the Railway Labor Act had been exhausted) to enjoin a threatened strike by respondent Union, charging

Gainesville Utilities Dept. Vs. Florida Power Corp.

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

benefits flowing from the Corporation to the City. The Commission is satisfied that the interconnection will permit a reciprocal exchange of benefits to the mutual advantage of both systems." " * * * *" "Staff's studies of … UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Syllabus Pursuant to § 202(b) of the Federal Power Act, the Federal Power Commission (FPC) is empowered to direct one electric utility to interconnect its electric system with … reasonably due" respondent because respondent would obtain no benefit from the interconnection. Section 313(b) of the Act provides that "findings of the Commission as to … Gainesville Utilities Dept. v. Florida Power Corp. - 402 U.S. 515 (1971) U.S. Supreme Court Gainesville Utilities Dept. v. Florida Power Corp., 402

National Railroad Passenger Corporation Vs. Boston and Maine Corp.

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Central Vermont Railroad (CV). B&M and CV have operated freight trains on the Conn River Line under reciprocal "trackage rights" agreements dating back to 1930. In 1977 Amtrak entered into a "trackage rights" agreement with B&M … THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT No. 90-1419. Argued January 13, 1992-Decided March 25, 1992* The Rail Passenger Service Act of 1970 (RPSA) created petitioner N ational Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak), a private corporation, to provide intercity and … add subsection (d) of § 402, 45 U. S. C. § 562(d). Section 562(d) provides in pertinent part: "(1) If the Corporation [Amtrak] and a … National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Boston & Maine Corp. - 503 U.S. 407 (1992) OCTOBER TERM, 1991 Syllabus NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION ET

Ghanashyam Rath Vs. Udayanath Naik

Court : Orissa

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : AIR1949Ori14

Judge of Cuttack, dated 26th July 1944, reversing a decision of the Munsif of Kendrapara, dated 13th July 1943. It raises a question which has friend the subject of several decisions of this Court in its Cuttack … force in the contention based upon Section 54, Contract Act. That section relates to a contract consisting of reciprocal promises', such that one cannot be performed or its performance cannot be claimed till the other has been … Cut. L.T. 19 and Badhamohan Thakur v. Bipin Behari A.I.R 1938 Pat 505.2. The appellant is the plaintiff. The suit was filed as a suit

Ahmed Ali Khan Bahadur (Died) and anr. Vs. Banguluru Veeralla and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11 - Order 1, Rule 8 - Order 21, Rule 63; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 52 and 53; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 40 to 44 and 115; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 120

Reported in : AIR1959AP280

and of Pal J., in Muhammad Juman Mia v. Akali Mudiani, AIR 1943 Cal 577 and also of Amir Ali J., in Ramdhone v. Kedarnath, … contended before the Supreme Court on behalf of the State of Orissa that the compromise was based upon reciprocal admissions and promises, that in the acknowledgment of the State's rights to the beds of the rivers is … decree was passed on 19-7-1911. Under the final decree, Hussain All Khan the 1st defendant to the partition action obtained about 124 acres of land in Cheruvu village for his shore. All the heirs of the late … judicata in a subsequent suit, and that if the necessary conditions of Section 11 of the Civil Procedure Code are complied with, a suit under … 1130 of 1950 arising out of A.S. Nos. 505 and 506 of 1948 on the file of

K. Nagarathnammal Vs. S. Ibrahim Saheb and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Madras Hereditary Village Offices Act, 1895 - Sections 10(5); Madras Regulation, 1928 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908

Reported in : AIR1955Mad305

the Boardthe statutory right which it has of superintendence under Section 5 of Regulation 1 of 1803 andthe reciprocal subservience of the Collector under Section 5 of Regulation 2 of 1803.'The learned Judges further observed:'...... .if the … duties of the Board to be 'the general superintendence of the revenues from whatever source they may arise.' Section 5 runs:'The Board of Revenue have had, and are here by declared, to have authority to superintend and control … an order made by the District Collector under Section 10(5) of Madras Act 3 of 1895 -- the Madras Hereditary Village Offices Act, 1895 --