Advanced Search Results

Mohammad Maqbool Hakim and ors. Vs. State of J. and K. and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Customs Act; ;Foreign Exchange Regulation Act; ;Prevention of Corruption Act, 2006 - Section 5(2); ; Ranbir Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 465, 466, 467, 468, 420, 471 and 477; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 415 Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Jammu and Kashmir Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1989 Smvt. - Section 561A; ;Crimial Procedure Code - Sections 173 and 482

Reported in : 2000CriLJ645

facie case is made Out against the accused under Section 5(2), Prevention of Corruption Act, 2006, 465/466/467/468/420/471/ 477-A Ranbir Penal Code read with Section 120-B, Ranbir Penal Code (RFC).7. Shri R. A. Jan, learned counsel for the petitioners, heavily … approach and sieved the complaint through a cullendar of finest gazes for testing the ingredients under Section 415, IPC. Such an endeavour may be justified during trial, but certainly not during the stage of investigation. At any

Surinder Dogra versus State Through Director CBI

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : [2025]2S.C.R.696

Mishra,* JJ.] Issue for Consideration Whether the concurrent conviction of the appellant under Sections 420, 468 and 471, Ranbir Penal Code, 1989 and Section 5(1)(d) read with Section 5 (2), Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 was justified. Headnotes† Ranbir … - Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - ss.5 (1) (d), 5 (2) - Appellant posted as Traffic Superintendent, Indian Airlines, Jammu at the relevant time prepared an infant ticket in a fictitious name and then tampered the

Babubhai @ Zaverchand Harjivan Sheth and Others Vs. the State of Mahar ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

120-B read with section 364 as also under Section 302 read further with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. A-1 and A-4 to A-8 were also convicted for the offence punishable under Section 201 read with Section … of the prosecution witness does not necessarily make the prosecution evidence untrustworthy. She referred to the ruling in Ranbir and others vs. State of Punjab reported in AIR 1973 SC 1409 In Para 7 the Apex Court … given case to bring home the charge of offence under Section 302 IPC. This, however, is not an inflexible rule. It cannot be held as … the ruling in Appanna Yellawwa vs. State, reported in AIR 1956 Bombay 471 to argue that the eyewitness though unsophisticated, if make improvement in the

Syed Mohammad Yousuf Vs. State and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Jammu and Kashmir Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 435, 439 and 497A; ;Jammu and Kashmir Prevention of Corruption Act, Svt. 2006 - Section 5(2); ;Ranbir Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 420 and 471

Reported in : 2003(3)JKJ537

given bail for any offence under the J&K; Prevention of Corruption Act or under any other offence of Ranbir Penal Code form a conspiracy angle. The trial Judge has appreciated the matter and passed a detailed order. It is … J&K; Prevention of Corruption Act or under any other offence of Ranbir Penal Code form a conspiracy angle. The trial Judge has appreciated the matter … of Police Station Crime Branch, Srinagar. Accused at no stage has been given bail either for offences under Section 471 or 120B RPC. He is not also given bail for offence under Section 5(2) of P.C. Act. These

State of J. and K. Vs. Jalal-ud-dIn Ganai

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 471; ;Jammu and Kashmir Ranbir Penal Code (IPC), 1989 - Sections 201, 420, 461, 467 and 471

Reported in : 2006CriLJ1054

the facts of the present case are examined, as I have stated above, prosecution has not established the criminal liability to attract Section 467. When that be the position, the criminal liability under Section 471 cannot be … lacking. The prosecution has failed to prove that accused has used forged certificate. Thus the charge framed under Section 471 of RPC also fails.25. There is not an iota of evidence on the file suggesting the fact that

Romesh Chander Vs. State

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Ranbir Penal Code (IPC) - Section 471

Reported in : 2004(1)JKJ304

to further undergo imprisonment of like nature for a period of 2 months in proof of offence under Section 471 R.P.C.2. The facts that culminating in the prosecution of the accused Romesh Chander stemming out of the record

State Vs. Suresh Kohli and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Jammu and Kashmir Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1989 - Sections 9, 205, 205(8), 205(D), 337, 337(1), 337(2), 435, 438 and 438(2); ;Ranbir Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 161, 165, 165A, 216A, 369, 401, 419, 420, 435, 467, 468, 471 and 477A

Reported in : 1993CriLJ3209

imprisonment, which may extend to sever years, or any offence under any of the following sections of the Ranbir Penal Code, namely, Sections 161, 165, 165-A, 216-A, 369, 401, 435 and 477-A, a Chief Judicial Magistrate a Sub-divisional Magistrate … which may extend to sever years, or any offence under any of the following sections of the Ranbir Penal Code, namely, Sections 161, 165, 165-A, 216-A, 369, 401, 435 and 477-A, a Chief Judicial Magistrate a Sub-divisional … the CIB Jammu. Undoubtedly the offences under Sections 120-B, RPC, 467 and 471 RPC were exclusively triable by the Court of Session Judge, Jammu. The … adjudicated upon the matter within the provisions of law as envisaged under Section 435, Cr. P.C. and made a reference to this court for confirmation,

J.S. Modi Vs. State of J and K Through Chief Secretary and Two ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : ConstitutionCriminal

Acts : Jammu and Kashmir Prevention of Corruption Act, 2006 - Section 5(2); ;Prevention of Corruption of Act - Section 6; ;Ranbir Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 201, 409, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 477A; ;Jammu and Kashmir Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 561A; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 154, 154(1), 156, 162, 173, 173(2), 173(8) and 482; ;Constitution of India - Articles 19, 21, 226 and 227; ;Financial Code; ;Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir - Section 103

Reported in : 2005CriLJ4256,2005(3)JKJ96

Corruption Act, 2006, read with sections 409, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 477A, 201, and 120B of the Ranbir Penal Code, in challan presented before Special Judge, Anti-Corruption, Jammu and seeks the quashing of FIR No. 34/97 Police Station, … Act, 2006, read with sections 409, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 477A, 201, and 120B of the Ranbir Penal Code, in challan presented before Special Judge, Anti-Corruption, Jammu and seeks the quashing of FIR No. 34/97 Police … for the respective parties.2. The petitioner is aggrieved of his prosecution under section 5(2) of the J&K; Prevention of Corruption Act, 2006, read with sections

r.s. Dahiya vs.state (Through Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

the judgment dated 06.01.2004 whereby the appellant Anil Kumar has been convicted under Sections 302/330/348 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 („IPC‟); while the appellants Dahiya and Sher Singh are convicted under Section 304 Part II read with … chargesheet in respect of the offence under Section 468 IPC while refusing to quash for the offences under Section 471, 120-B and 201 IPC. In this background, the Court while examining the scope of Section 482 Cr.P.C. and … 198/2004 Page 19 of 108 (2015) DLT242(paragraphs 70 - 72); State v. Ranbir Singh, 166 (2010) DLT427(paragraphs 33 - 36); Munshi Singh Gautam (D) v.

Anil Kumar vs.state

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

the judgment dated 06.01.2004 whereby the appellant Anil Kumar has been convicted under Sections 302/330/348 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 („IPC‟); while the appellants Dahiya and Sher Singh are convicted under Section 304 Part II read with … chargesheet in respect of the offence under Section 468 IPC while refusing to quash for the offences under Section 471, 120-B and 201 IPC. In this background, the Court while examining the scope of Section 482 Cr.P.C. and … 198/2004 Page 19 of 108 (2015) DLT242(paragraphs 70 - 72); State v. Ranbir Singh, 166 (2010) DLT427(paragraphs 33 - 36); Munshi Singh Gautam (D) v.