Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: ranbir panel code section 304 · Page 1 of about 6 results (0.023 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 01 1991

Ramesh Chander Vs. State

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on : Aug-01-1991

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Ranbir Panel Code - Section 304

Reported in : 1992CriLJ1411

the objections.This is an application for grant of bail by the petitioner Romesh Chander in pending trial under Section 304 RPC. Romesh Chander is facing trial along with three other persons, all the four accused had approached this … Sessions Judge, Jammu, whereby he had refused to hear and try this case on the ground that the criminal clerk of his court was related to one of the accused persons and he had accordingly referred the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 21 1999

Sabir Hajam and anr. Vs. the State

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on : Oct-21-1999

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Ranbir Panel Code, 1989 Svt. - Sections 141, 148, 149, 302, 304, 304(1), 304I and 323; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161 and 342

Reported in : 2000CriLJ2050

judgment of conviction/acquittal dated 1-8-1985 and order of sentence dated 14-8-1985, accused Sabir Hajam and Gani Hajam filed criminal appeal 6/85, so far as their conviction and sentence is concerned. The State has also filed Criminal/Acquittal Appeal … Judge, Pulwama. Accused Gani Jaham, and Sabir Hajam, were convicted and sentenced to 10 years rigorous imprisonment under Section 304-I, R.P.C. Three accused Gulla Hajamli Hajam and Rashid Hajam, were convicted and sentenced to one year simple imprisonment

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 10 2003

State Vs. Vikas Mahajan and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on : Feb-10-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Jammu and Kashmir Ranbir Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 272, 273 and 420

Reported in : 2003CriLJ2237,2003(3)JKJ268

found that the samples of basin were adulterated. Charge was framed under Sections 220, 272, 273 of the Ranbir Panel Code. The trial court came to the conclusion that a case under Sections 272, 273 of the Ranbir Panel … dream of using as food' James v. Jones (1894) 1 Q B 304 at p. 304.7. The sale of unwholesome food is reprobated not because … premises. The contained basin adulterated with wheat flour. This was seized. This led to proceedings being taken under Section 3/7 of the Essential Commodities Act. Samples were sent to the Public Analyst. It is found that the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 21 1995

Ranbir Yadav Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-21-1995

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 227; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120 B, 141, 142,147, 148, 149, 201, 300, 302, 307, 320, 364, 380 and 436; Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1952 - Sections 4 and 6(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 216, 366, 397(2), 465 and 537; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 537; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 154, 161, 162(1), 194, 273, 299 and 407; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (CrCP) (Amendment) Act, 1978

Reported in : AIR1995SC1219; 1995(43)BLJR1053; 1995CriLJ2665; 1995(2)Crimes161(SC); JT1995(3)SC228; 1995(2)SCALE331; (1995)4SCC392; [1995]2SCR826; 1995(2)LC212(SC)

with modification in convictions and sentences of some of them. As regards the three appellants before us, namely, Ranbir Yadav, Sukhdeo Yadav and Pandav Yadav, the High Court affirmed their convictions and sentences except for the offences … protest with regard to the appointment of a lawyer from the defence panel by the accused on the very first day of taking of the … permit, the witness shall be discharged. 19. When the Code of 1898 was repealed and replaced by the Code Section 350 was renumbered as 326 without any textual change. However, later on by the Criminal Procedure Code (Amendment) … same night on the statement of one Janki Bind being case No. 304 of 1985 under Sections 148, 149/302, 201, 436 and 320 IPC and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 2026

Vijay Dahiya vs State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-29-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

and SI Sukhwinder Singh, Crime Branch+ W.P.(CRL) 945/2025 & CRL.M.A. 8855/2025 VIJAY DAHIYA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Faraz Maqbool, Panel Counsel, DHCLSC, with Ms. A. Sahitya Veena, Ms. Deepshikha and Ms. Ananya Luthra, Advs.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI … in a case arising out of FIR bearing no. 862/2016 registered under Sections 302/201/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 („IPC‟) at Police Station Shahbad Dairy, New Delhi. The appeals preferred by the petitioners against their conviction … in a case arising out of FIR bearing no. 862/2016 registered under Sections 302/201/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 („IPC‟) at Police Station Shahbad … Court in State of Gujarat and Another v. Narayan (2021) 20 SCC 304, and Atbir (supra).13. They submit that the grant of parole/furlough beingdiscretionary, is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 2026

Sandeep Alias Sandy vs State Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Anrl.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-29-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

SI Sukhwinder Singh, Crime Branch + W.P.(CRL) 945/2025 & CRL.M.A. 8855/2025 VIJAY DAHIYA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Faraz Maqbool, Panel Counsel, DHCLSC, with Ms. A. Sahitya Veena, Ms. Deepshikha and Ms. Ananya Luthra, Advs.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI … in a case arising out of FIR bearing no. 862/2016 registered under Sections 302/201/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 („IPC‟) at Police Station Shahbad Dairy, New Delhi. The appeals preferred by the petitioners against their conviction … in a case arising out of FIR bearing no. 862/2016 registered under Sections 302/201/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 („IPC‟) at Police Station Shahbad … Court in State of Gujarat and Another v. Narayan (2021) 20 SCC 304, and Atbir (supra).13. They submit that the grant of parole/furlough beingdiscretionary, is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial