Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: railways second amendment act 2003 section 3 · Page 1 of about 716 results (0.079 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 03 2023

K. Surendran vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Oct-03-2023

sheeted against the petitioner and others alleging offences punishable under Sections 147, 145(b), 146 and 174 of the Railways (Second Amendment) Act, 2003.3. The prosecution case is that on 26.02.2013 atabout 16.00 hours, accused persons barged into the railway station … FOLLOWING: P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN --------------------- --------------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of October, 2023ORDERThis Criminal Miscellaneous Case is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (“the Code” for the sake of brevity).2. The petitioner is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 02 2023

K.Abraham Mathen vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-02-2023

him and the remaining accused are punishable under Sections 142(b) and 143(1)(a) and (b) and 143(2) of the Railways (Second Amendment) Act, 2003 (for short, 'the Railways Act').3. The revision petitioner was working as a Reservation-cum-Enquiry Clerk at Kottayam Railway Station. … petitioner is the accused No.3 inC.C.No.31/2006. The offence alleged against him and the remaining accused are punishable under Sections 142(b) and 143(1)(a) and (b) and 143(2) of the Railways (Second Amendment) Act, 2003 (for short, 'the Railways

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 15 2015

K. Anbazhagan Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-15-2015

Subject : Education

Anbazhagan v. The Superintendent of Police[41]. but in that case, the Special Public Prosecutor was shown as the second respondent and therefore Mr. Acharya was entitled to appear in that case being a respondent therein. Conclusion 119. … Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Central Act No.2 of 1974) as amended by the Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act 1978 and Rule 30 of the Karnataka Law Officers (Appointment and Conditions of Service) Rules 1977 Sri B.V. … allowed by this court by its judgment and order dated 18th November, 2003 and the decision of this court is reported as K. Anbazhagan v. … Bhavani Singh as a Special Public Prosecutor and on an interpretation of Sections 24, 25, 25-A and 301(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. … an interpretation of Sections 24, 25, 25-A and 301(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 24 2012

Radhika George and ors Vs. 6 Tanishq Builders.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-24-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Acts : Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 - Section 95A; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act - Section 164

(a) The five Boards which have been established before the commencement of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development (Second Amendment) Act, 1992 (Mah. XXII of 1992), and shown in column 1 of the following table, shall have the area … the Respondent No.6 be restrained from utilizing the FSI in respect of the land acquired by the Central Railways for the railway project;(g) that pending the hearing and final disposal of the present petition, the operation and … do additions, alterations or reconstruction at individual row- houses..."15 On 20 March 2003, the Collector of Mumbai, Suburban District issued a letter inter alia, stating … Engineer, Housing, Ghatkopar Division, M.H. & ADB being statutory authority constituted under Section 95A of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 (for short, … 1269, at Village Kirol. The area totally admeasures 3721.53 sq. yards and consists of 8 plots of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 05 2021

Jaishri Laxmanrao Patil Vs. The Chief Minister And Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-05-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

Chief Justice for the suitable orders. Referring order although mention that the interpretation of Constitution (One Hundred and Second Amendment) Act, 2018 is substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution but the reference was not … or posts in the public services under the State) for Educationally and Socially Backward Category (ESBC) Act, 2014.116. Section 3 provides for applicability to all the direct recruitments, appointments made in public services and posts in the State

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 26 2010

Tata Sky Limited Vs. the State of Uttarakhand and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Decided on : Jul-26-2010

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; ; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Section 4; ; Indian Wireless Telegraphy Act, 1933; ; Uttar Pradesh Entertainment and Betting Tax Act, 1979 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 4A, 4A(4), 4B and 4C; ; Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923; ; Uttar Pradesh Entertainment and Betting Tax (Amendment) Act, 2009; ; Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 65, 65(5), 65(13), 65(63), 65(72) and 137; ; Prasar Bharti (Broadcasting Corporation of India) Act, 1990 - Section 2; ; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 65, 66(5), 65(14), 65(15), 65(80) and 65(90); ; Finance Act, 2003 - Section 65, 65(16), 65(95), 65(105) and 66(1); ; Finance Act, 2004; ; Finance Act, 2005 - Section 65(16) and 65(105); ; Government of India Act, 1935; ; Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995; ; Bengal Amusements Tax Act, 1922; ; We

4 of that Act. Thereafter, under Section 4-A of that Act, inserted by the West Bengal Taxation Laws (Second Amendment) Act, 1983 the area of its application was extended to levy and collection of tax from the holders of … cost accountants and architects. We further hold that the above position now stands fortified by the Constitution (Eighty-eighth Amendment) Act, 2003 which has inserted Article 268A and Entry 92C which clearly indicates that Entry 60 of List II and … goods within the meaning of 'sale' in Section 2(h); it also receives consideration, therefore, the requirements of charging Section 3 read with Section 3(f) are satisfied. The judgments and orders under challenge in these appeals are, therefore, set

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 2007

All India Federation of Tax Practitioners and ors. Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-21-2007

Subject : Service TaxConstitution

Acts : Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65, 65(16), 66, 67, 68, 71, 72, 73 and 83; Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998; Constitution (Eighty-eighth Amendment) Act, 2003; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 3, 9C, 9D and 11B; Income Tax Act, 1961; Medicinal Act, 1955; Kerala Abkari Act; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 60; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 100 and 142A; Uttar Pradesh Tax on Luxuries Act, 1995; Andhra Pradesh Tax on Luxuries Act, 1987; West Bengal Luxury Tax Act, 1994; Haryana Passengers and Goods Taxation Act, 1952 - Sections 3(3); Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 245, 246, 246(1), 246(3), 248, 265, 268A, 269, 276, 276(1), 276(2), 276(3) and 366(29A)

Reported in : AIR2007SC2990; (2008)5CompLJ488(SC); (2007)211CTR(SC)449; 2007(120)ECC451; 2007LC451(SC); [2007]293ITR406(SC); JT2007(10)SC305; (2007)6MLJ1062(SC); 2007(10)SCALE178; 2007(7)SCC527

first group, a tax in relation thereto is separately mentioned in the second group. For example, Entry 22 in List I refers to 'Railways' whereas … the Government introduced a new Article 268A in the Constitution in the year 2003 by Constitution (Eighty- eighth Amendment) Act, 2003, which provides that taxes on services shall be charged by Union of India and shall be appropriated by … any person by the service provider who was responsible for collecting the service tax. It was similar to Section 3 of Central Excise Act, 1944. Section 67 dealt with valuation of taxable services. Section 68 dealt with collection

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 22 2019

New Delhi Municipal Council Vs. Association of Concerned Citizens of N ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-22-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

recommendation of the V.K. Malhotra Committee. After receiving the final report from Dharmarajan Committee, the Delhi Municipal Corporation (Amendment) Act, 2003 was passed. Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by the Delhi Municipal Corporation (Amendment) Act, the Delhi … when this Delhi Municipal Committee was upgraded to the level of a second class municipality to be governed under the Punjab Municipal Act, 1911 (hereinafter … and Foreign Embassies, (c) properties of State Governments and (d) properties of Railways.8) The above four types of properties are outside the purview of propertyAct in 1994. In this regard, reference may also be had to the definition of “annual value” in Section 3(1) (b) of the Punjab Municipal Act which provides that annual value shall mean the gross annual rent which

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 06 2004

Siraj Vs. High Court of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-06-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : Kerala State and Subordinate Service Rules, 1958 - Rules 7, 7(2), 14 to 17; Public Service Commission Procedure Rules - Rules 4 and 12; Constitution of India - Articles 15(4), 16(4) and 335

Reported in : 2004(3)KLT1

Hence, the 1st respondent-High Court has no authority to fix a cut off marks in the examination.9. The second point to be considered is that 1st respondent has not prepared Ext.P2 select list as per the provisions … of a State.'15. Amendments brought into Articles 15, 16 and 335 of the Constitution by the Constitution (First Amendment) Act, 1951, the Constitution (Eighty-first Amendment) Act, 2000, the Constitution (Eighty-fifth Amendment) Act, 2001, the Constitution (Seventy-nineth Amendment) Act, … in State of Punjab and Ors. v. Manjit Singh and Ors. (AIR 2003 SC 4580), can be taken as a guidance in which the Apex … this principle of equality or opportunity. Another view mostly shared by a section of the House is that, if this principle is to be operative … Munsiff-Magistrate.(3) Only candidates who secure not less than 35 per cent marks in each of the papers

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 22 2008

Sudhir Kumar Srivastava Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through General Manag ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-22-2008

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 2008(4)AWC3429

of the Railways Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the Act for short) was introduced as per Railway (Amendment) Act, 28 of 1994, was for awarding compensation for untoward incident which occurs in the course of working of … of the appellant has been dismissed.2. The facts, in brief, are that the appellant was travelling on a second class ticket bearing No. Ho. 12001 from Barabanki to Lucknow and when the appellant was trying to alight … submitted that the Railway Passengers (Manner of Investigation of Untoward Incidents) Rules, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules of 2003) also provide under Rule … 2001 (2) TAC 250 and the purpose and object, with which the Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the Act … the occurrence of an untoward incident under Rule 3 shall make necessary entries to this effect in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial