Advanced Search Results

Ramakrishna Steel Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 38, 83, 84 and 99; General Rules - Rule 152

Reported in : I(2001)ACC194

(d) and Clause (h) of Section 46-C'. 16. Section 99 is the corresponding provision under the present Indian Railways Act, 1989 and it is the same as Section 77 of the old Act, except for the omission of Sub-section

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. U.P. Asbestos Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

were also provided.6. Thus, the Tribunal committed manifest error in applying the provisions of Section 99 of the Railways Act, 1989, as they are not at all attracted in the facts and circumstances of the case, as a consequence

Container Corporation of India vs.united India Insurance Co. Ltd. And ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

appellant/defendant No.1 also denied its liability by giving a reference to the provision of Section 99 of the Railways Act, 1989. An alternative plea was also taken, that at best the liability of the appellant/defendant No.1 under Section 103

Kedarnath Jagdish Rai and Hemraj Lalji and Co. Vs. the Union of India ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 78B; Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 16 and 13(1)

Reported in : III(2004)ACC509; (2003)3MLJ446

of wheat of the value of Rs.1,78,000/-. The appellant caused a notice under Section 78B of the Indian Railways Act, 1890 on 05.05.1993 and thereafter moved the application under Section 16 of The Railway Claims Tribunal Act. The … of the commodity?(ii)Whether the railways are not liable even as bailee under Section 99(1) of the Railways Act, 1989?(iii)Whether the Railways used reasonable foresight and care in the carriage of the goods?(iv)Whether the applicant is entitled to

Sandha Ghosh Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 2(29), 55, 68,123 and 124A; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 302

Reported in : 2004(1)CHN696

in his reply submitted that having regard to the object and scope of such beneficial legislation i.e. The Railways Act, 1989, the strict rule of interpretation cannot have any application whatsoever.14. There can be no dispute as to the … identified the dead body as that of said Ananda Ghosh. Over this, Naihati GRPS Case No. 11/98 under Section 302 of I.P.C. dated 5th March, 1998 was started. Appellants, as applicants before the learned Tribunal claimed that

Ajay Maken & Ors. Vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

To summarise the Railways' contentions: (i) Lands ―belonging to the Railways‖ fall exclusively within the purview of the Railways Act, 1989. Reference is made to the definition of ‗Railway‘ contained in Section 2(31) of the Railways Act, 1989. It … above steps, would be contrary to the law explained in all of the above decisions. W.P.(C) 11616/2015 Page 99 of 104 XII Stand of the Railways 137. That leaves for consideration the stand taken by the Railways,

Rajendra Textiles, Jodhpur Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 77(2); Railways (Amendment) Act, 1989 - Sections 99

Reported in : 2003ACJ1163; AIR2002Raj226; 2002(4)WLC748; 2002(4)WLN41

the appellant is not entitled to get compensation because of the provisions of Section 77(2) of the Indian Railways Act, 1890 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act').6. While deciding Issue No. 5, which relates to entitlement of the

M/S Stelling Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (railyatri.in) and Anr. Vs.indian ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

not understood the nature of petitioner‟s business; that the petitioner No.1 had not violated any provisions of the Railways Act, 1989; its reply to the Cyber Crime Cell and illegal pressurizing of Paytm. The petitioner No.1 further called upon … later stage when a large number of customers have been cheated of their money.33. Reliance is placed on Section 143 of the Railways Act, 1989 to state that all activities pertaining to sale of railway tickets including … Mehra, Ms. Vandana Sehgal, W.P.(C) No.9864/2017 and connected matters Page 1 of 99 Mr. Anand Daga, Ms. Gunjan Ahuja and Mr. Iqram Govind Singh, Advs.

Nirmal Traders Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 78 and 79; Constitution of India - Article 226

Matched in: Advocate G.N. Sahewalla, Sr. Adv. B. Sharma, SC, Railways and B. Das, SC, CBI

M/S Kalpataru Agroforest Enterprises Vs. Union of India

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 18, 18(1) and (3), 23, 30 and 30(2); Railway Claims Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1989 - Rules 20, 32 and 32(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order XLVII, Rules 1 and 2; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 74

Reported in : 2001(4)MPHT76

paid by the appellant and title to goods had passed to the consignee under Section 74 of the Railways Act, 1989 (henceforth 'the Act') and, consequently, the appellant could not file the claim for refund of excess of freight.8.