Advanced Search Results

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Indian Oil Corporation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 93, 94 and 98

Reported in : I(2005)ACC470; 116(2005)DLT439

applicant has no locus standi to sue, that the amount claimed is excessive and that Sec.93(f)(i) of the Railways Act, 1989 is applicable in this case and has also taken the shelter under Section 98 on the ground that

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. M. Thankaraj and Etc. Etc.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 124A, 126 and 129; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 5, 22, 24 and 24A; Railways Accidents and Untoward Incidents (Compensation) Rules, 1990 - Rule 3(4); Railways Accidents and Untoward Incidents (Compensation) (Amendment) Rules, 1997; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 34

Reported in : 2000ACJ651; AIR2000Ker91

Claims Tribunal, Ernakulam Bench granting compensation for death or personal injuries of passengers under the provisions of the Railways Act, 1989 read with Rules issued thereunder. Except M.F.A. No. 915/98 all the other appeals are at the Instance of … consider the common question of law and thereafter deal with the factual contentions raised in each case separately.2. Section 124 of the Railways Act, 1989 provides for liability of Railway administration for loss occasioned by the death

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railway Act, 1989 - Sections 93, 94, 97, 98 and 106

Reported in : I(2005)ACC66; 115(2004)DLT552

Motor Spirit (Petrol) booked with the Respondent railway administration? 3. Whether a valid notice u/s 106 of the Railways Act was served upon the respondent? 4. To what amount, if any, the applicant is entitled to as compensation? … not signed, verified and filed by a duly authorised person and sought protection under Sec.93/97/98 of the Railway Act 1989 (for short the 'Act'). It is further alleged that the loading and sealing of the wagon was not … 4. Counsel for the appellant submits that the Railways are protected under Sections 93 and 94 of the Railways Act inasmuch it was the duty

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Amira Traders

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : I.R.A - Sections 93, 98, 102, 106 and 110

Reported in : 114(2004)DLT302; 2004(77)DRJ135

no reason to interfere with the same. 6. FAO 313/1999 is dismissed. CM 7202/2004 also stands dismissed. Railway Act, 1989 - Sections 93, 98, 102 and 110--Appeal against award of Railway Claims Tribunal--Damage to consignment booked from the … nothing to show that the damage to the goods was as a result of any default by the Railways. Counsel heavily relies upon the report of the Chief Principal Scientist of Pusa Institute. 4. I have heard … Whether the respondents are protected U/s 93(f)(g) read with Sec.98, 102 and Section 110 of I.R.A?1 Whether the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to entertain the

Sh. Raj Kumar vs Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

not on account of an “untoward incident” within the meaning as defined under section 123 (c) of the Railways Act, 1989. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant has contended that the Tribunal has erred in holding that the appellant … stated that on account of the accident suffered, the appellant has lost both of his legs and had 98% permanent physical disablement. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent, on the other hand, has opposed the application. 4.

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Property

State Government to exercise its power under the Assam Act, he urged. Referring to Section 13 of the Railways Act 1989, Mr. Choudhury, argued that the land being vested in the State Government, as is evidenced by the revenue

Govind Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Allahabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2006)(3)SLJ59CAT

to create such new Zonal Railways is vested with the Central Government vide Section 3(4) of the Indian Railways Act, 1989 (Act 24 of 1989). Such a creation of new zones would inevitably lead to allocation and re-allocation of … Jabalpur Central Railways. 4. North Central Railway, Allahabad Division of Northern Allahabad Railway as re-organized vide Notification No. 98/E&R/700/1/ 5. South East Central Nagpur Division of South Eastern Railway, Bilaspur Railway and_________________________________________________________________________ Table II shall exercise jurisdiction

Union of India (Uoi) Through General Manager, N.E. Railway Vs. Gauri S ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 2008ACJ2500; 2007(3)AWC2766

has also drawn attention of the Court to the provisions of Sections 123, 124 and 125 of the Railways Act, 1989. The aforementioned two judgments lay down the same principle with respect to the definition of dependant under the … Sinha learned Counsel for the appellant and Sri Balwant Singh learned Counsel for the respondents.2. This appeal under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act has been preferred by the Union of India challenging the award

M/S Kalpataru Agroforest Enterprises Vs. Union of India

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 18, 18(1) and (3), 23, 30 and 30(2); Railway Claims Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1989 - Rules 20, 32 and 32(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order XLVII, Rules 1 and 2; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 74

Reported in : 2001(4)MPHT76

paid by the appellant and title to goods had passed to the consignee under Section 74 of the Railways Act, 1989 (henceforth 'the Act') and, consequently, the appellant could not file the claim for refund of excess of freight.8.

Ajay Maken & Ors. Vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

To summarise the Railways' contentions: (i) Lands ―belonging to the Railways‖ fall exclusively within the purview of the Railways Act, 1989. Reference is made to the definition of ‗Railway‘ contained in Section 2(31) of the Railways Act, 1989. It … Singh it is essential to first complete the survey and consult the JJ dwellers. Further, W.P.(C) 11616/2015 Page 98 of 104 under Section 10 (1) of the DUSIB Act, read with the 2015 Policy, and even otherwise,