Advanced Search Results
Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Ibp Co. Ltd.
Andhra Pradesh
Dec-15-2004
Civil
Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 94
III(2005)ACC181; 2006ACJ2807; AIR2005AP179; 2005(2)ALD66; 2005(2)ALT596
examined on behalf of the applicant. Based on certain documents, the Tribunal held that Section 94 of the Railways Act, 1989 cannot be used as a defence and there is no law that prohibits the Railway to supervise the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi), Rep. by the General Manager, S.C. Railway Vs. St ...
Andhra Pradesh
Dec-23-2004
Civil
Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 78, 79, 94, 94(1) and 94(2)
2005(2)ALD403; 2005(3)ALT15
and delivery places are the private sidings of the SAIL. That apart, as per Section 94 of the Railways Act, 1989, (for short 'the Act') the applicant is not entitled for any compensation for whatever cause. Section 94 of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) Vs. Iisco and anr.
Delhi
Nov-19-2004
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80; Indian Railways Act 1989 - Sections 76 and 94(2)
I(2005)ACC862; 117(2005)DLT458
record. I find that the contentions of learned counsel is quite contrary to Section 94(2) of the Indian Railways Act 1989 contained therein. Even otherwise the question over here is one of fact which has been determined on the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Udaipur Cement Works Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.
Rajasthan
Feb-23-2005
Civil
Companies Act, 1956; Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 13, 13(1), 29(2) and 41(1); Railways act, 1989 - Sections 94
AIR2005Raj267; RLW2005(2)Raj1170; 2005(3)WLC125
Tribunal shall have jurisdiction in matters relating to responsibilities of railway administration as Careers under Chapter-VII of the Railways act, 1989 (for short 'the Act of 1989') in respect of the claims for compensation as enumerated in Sub-clause (i) … incidental to freight within the scope of word 'freight' used in Section 13(1)(b) of the Act of 1987.16. Section 94 of the Act of 1989 provides that the Railway administration shall not be responsible for any loss, destruction,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) Vs. Indian Oil Corporation
Delhi
Oct-29-2004
Civil
Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 93, 94 and 98
I(2005)ACC470; 116(2005)DLT439
applicant has no locus standi to sue, that the amount claimed is excessive and that Sec.93(f)(i) of the Railways Act, 1989 is applicable in this case and has also taken the shelter under Section 98 on the ground that … the Railways are protected under Section 93(f)(i) of the Railways Act (for short ''the Act'') as also under Section 94 thereof. The learned Tribunal has held that the Railway Administration had not discharged its responsibility in handling the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) Vs. I.B.P. Co. Ltd.
Andhra Pradesh
Dec-15-2004
InsuranceMotor Vehicles
II(2007)ACC194
examined on behalf of the applicant. Based on certain documents, the Tribunal held that Section 94 of the Railways Act, 1989 cannot be used as a defence and there is no law that prohibits the Railways to supervise the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) Vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited
Delhi
Oct-29-2004
Civil
Railway Act, 1989 - Sections 93, 94, 97, 98 and 106
I(2005)ACC66; 115(2004)DLT552
4. Counsel for the appellant submits that the Railways are protected under Sections 93 and 94 of the Railways Act inasmuch it was the duty … Motor Spirit (Petrol) booked with the Respondent railway administration? 3. Whether a valid notice u/s 106 of the Railways Act was served upon the respondent? 4. To what amount, if any, the applicant is entitled to as compensation? … not signed, verified and filed by a duly authorised person and sought protection under Sec.93/97/98 of the Railway Act 1989 (for short the 'Act'). It is further alleged that the loading and sealing of the wagon was not
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi), Secunderabad Vs. B. Koddekar and anr.
Andhra Pradesh
Jun-07-2002
Civil
Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 18, 23, 123(C) and 124(A); Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 2, 123 and 124A; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities Prevention Act, 1987 - Sections 3(1); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 123 and 124; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 140
2003ACJ1286; AIR2003AP23; 2002(4)ALT310
persons could be held to be an untoward incident falling within the ambit of Section 123(c) of the Railways Act, 1989 ? 2) Whether the applicants-respondents in these appeals are entitled for compensation under Section 124A of the Railways
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Mukesh and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Oct-19-2006
Criminal
Railway Act, 1989 - Sections 143(1), 143(2) and 186; Evidence Act - Sections 30; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 107
[2007(1)JCR317(SC)]; 2006(10)SCALE346
We, therefore, do not intend to interfere therewith. The appeal is dismissed. Criminal - Abetment- Section 143 of Railways Act, 1989 and Section 107of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 107 - Respondents were Railway reservation clerks - They … and in the process apprehended a person named Suresh Shah. He was from Mumbai. From a search conducted, 94 tickets of different trains and some filled up as well as some unfilled reservation demand forms were recovered
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGodisela Rajamma and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Andhra Pradesh
Jun-07-2002
Civil
Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 123 and 123(2); Railways (Amendment) Act, 1994; Railways Act, 1890
2003ACJ1404; 2002(4)ALD632; 2002(4)ALT370
Matched in: Advocate S. Chandra Sekhar, Adv. D. Srinivas, SC for Railways
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »