Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: railways act 1989 section 94 · Page 1 of about 348 results (0.038 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 15 2004

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Ibp Co. Ltd.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-15-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 94

Reported in : III(2005)ACC181; 2006ACJ2807; AIR2005AP179; 2005(2)ALD66; 2005(2)ALT596

examined on behalf of the applicant. Based on certain documents, the Tribunal held that Section 94 of the Railways Act, 1989 cannot be used as a defence and there is no law that prohibits the Railway to supervise the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 23 2004

Union of India (Uoi), Rep. by the General Manager, S.C. Railway Vs. St ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-23-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 78, 79, 94, 94(1) and 94(2)

Reported in : 2005(2)ALD403; 2005(3)ALT15

and delivery places are the private sidings of the SAIL. That apart, as per Section 94 of the Railways Act, 1989, (for short 'the Act') the applicant is not entitled for any compensation for whatever cause. Section 94 of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 19 2004

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Iisco and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-19-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80; Indian Railways Act 1989 - Sections 76 and 94(2)

Reported in : I(2005)ACC862; 117(2005)DLT458

record. I find that the contentions of learned counsel is quite contrary to Section 94(2) of the Indian Railways Act 1989 contained therein. Even otherwise the question over here is one of fact which has been determined on the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 23 2005

Udaipur Cement Works Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-23-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 13, 13(1), 29(2) and 41(1); Railways act, 1989 - Sections 94

Reported in : AIR2005Raj267; RLW2005(2)Raj1170; 2005(3)WLC125

Tribunal shall have jurisdiction in matters relating to responsibilities of railway administration as Careers under Chapter-VII of the Railways act, 1989 (for short 'the Act of 1989') in respect of the claims for compensation as enumerated in Sub-clause (i) … incidental to freight within the scope of word 'freight' used in Section 13(1)(b) of the Act of 1987.16. Section 94 of the Act of 1989 provides that the Railway administration shall not be responsible for any loss, destruction,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 29 2004

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Indian Oil Corporation

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-29-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 93, 94 and 98

Reported in : I(2005)ACC470; 116(2005)DLT439

applicant has no locus standi to sue, that the amount claimed is excessive and that Sec.93(f)(i) of the Railways Act, 1989 is applicable in this case and has also taken the shelter under Section 98 on the ground that … the Railways are protected under Section 93(f)(i) of the Railways Act (for short ''the Act'') as also under Section 94 thereof. The learned Tribunal has held that the Railway Administration had not discharged its responsibility in handling the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 15 2004

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. I.B.P. Co. Ltd.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-15-2004

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : II(2007)ACC194

examined on behalf of the applicant. Based on certain documents, the Tribunal held that Section 94 of the Railways Act, 1989 cannot be used as a defence and there is no law that prohibits the Railways to supervise the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 29 2004

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-29-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railway Act, 1989 - Sections 93, 94, 97, 98 and 106

Reported in : I(2005)ACC66; 115(2004)DLT552

4. Counsel for the appellant submits that the Railways are protected under Sections 93 and 94 of the Railways Act inasmuch it was the duty … Motor Spirit (Petrol) booked with the Respondent railway administration? 3. Whether a valid notice u/s 106 of the Railways Act was served upon the respondent? 4. To what amount, if any, the applicant is entitled to as compensation? … not signed, verified and filed by a duly authorised person and sought protection under Sec.93/97/98 of the Railway Act 1989 (for short the 'Act'). It is further alleged that the loading and sealing of the wagon was not

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 07 2002

Union of India (Uoi), Secunderabad Vs. B. Koddekar and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-07-2002

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 18, 23, 123(C) and 124(A); Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 2, 123 and 124A; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities Prevention Act, 1987 - Sections 3(1); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 123 and 124; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 140

Reported in : 2003ACJ1286; AIR2003AP23; 2002(4)ALT310

persons could be held to be an untoward incident falling within the ambit of Section 123(c) of the Railways Act, 1989 ? 2) Whether the applicants-respondents in these appeals are entitled for compensation under Section 124A of the Railways

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 19 2006

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Mukesh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-19-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Railway Act, 1989 - Sections 143(1), 143(2) and 186; Evidence Act - Sections 30; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 107

Reported in : [2007(1)JCR317(SC)]; 2006(10)SCALE346

We, therefore, do not intend to interfere therewith. The appeal is dismissed. Criminal - Abetment- Section 143 of Railways Act, 1989 and Section 107of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 107 - Respondents were Railway reservation clerks - They … and in the process apprehended a person named Suresh Shah. He was from Mumbai. From a search conducted, 94 tickets of different trains and some filled up as well as some unfilled reservation demand forms were recovered

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 07 2002

Godisela Rajamma and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-07-2002

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 123 and 123(2); Railways (Amendment) Act, 1994; Railways Act, 1890

Reported in : 2003ACJ1404; 2002(4)ALD632; 2002(4)ALT370

Matched in: Advocate S. Chandra Sekhar, Adv. D. Srinivas, SC for Railways

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial