Advanced Search Results

Mahipal Battulal JaIn Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through the General Man ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 2004(2)ALLMR45; (2004)106BOMLR943

resisted the claim by filing written statement. It is contended that the notice under Section 106 of the Railways Act, 1989 (Act No. 24 of 1989) (for short the Act) was not served and the appellant did not pay … and they are solely responsible for the loss of the luggage in transit and claimed compensation of Rs. 90,061.00/- on account of undelivered goods, Rs. 22,608/- on account of interest at the rate of 9% per annum

C. Linge Gowda Vs. Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 2(30), 124, 129 and 200; Railway Accidents (Compensation) Rules, 1990 - Rule 3(3); Railway Accidents (Compensation) Rules, 1950; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6

Reported in : II(1998)ACC469; 1998ACJ701; 1998(6)KarLJ552

Acts/Rules/Orders:Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 2(30), 124, 129 and 200;Railway Accidents (Compensation) Rules, 1990 - Rule 3(3);Railway Accidents (Compensation) Rules, 1950;General … Gazette dated 7th June, 1990 and were made operative from the date of commencement of the Act of 1989. Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, provides with reference to the effect of repeal. It provided that a … of the accident. He made a claim to the tune of Rs. 90,000/- for injuries and Rs. 500/- for loss of articles.The claim petition has

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. M. Thankaraj and Etc. Etc.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 124A, 126 and 129; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 5, 22, 24 and 24A; Railways Accidents and Untoward Incidents (Compensation) Rules, 1990 - Rule 3(4); Railways Accidents and Untoward Incidents (Compensation) (Amendment) Rules, 1997; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 34

Reported in : 2000ACJ651; AIR2000Ker91

Claims Tribunal, Ernakulam Bench granting compensation for death or personal injuries of passengers under the provisions of the Railways Act, 1989 read with Rules issued thereunder. Except M.F.A. No. 915/98 all the other appeals are at the Instance of … consider the common question of law and thereafter deal with the factual contentions raised in each case separately.2. Section 124 of the Railways Act, 1989 provides for liability of Railway administration for loss occasioned by the death … Court in Union of India v. Smt. Laxmipati, AIR 1995 Madh Pra 90. It was held that even if Section 34 of C. P. C.

Union of India Through Its General Manager North Eastern Railway Gorak ...

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Subject : MRTP

to discharge. 6. Learned counsel has also relied on the provisions of sections 97 and 100 of the Railways Act, 1989 under which the railways cannot be held liable for compensation in this case and the State Commission erred … the complainant which she has failed to discharge. 6. Learned counsel has also relied on the provisions of sections 97 and 100 of the Railways Act, 1989 under which the railways cannot be held liable for compensation … those of Unionof India and Ors. Vs. J.S. Kunwar [1 2010 CPJ 90 (NC)] and Unionof India and Ors. Vs. Sanjiv Dilsukhraj Dave and Anr.

Union of India Through Its General Manager North Eastern Railway Gorak ...

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Subject : MRTP

to discharge. 6. Learned counsel has also relied on the provisions of sections 97 and 100 of the Railways Act, 1989 under which the railways cannot be held liable for compensation in this case and the State Commission erred … the complainant which she has failed to discharge. 6. Learned counsel has also relied on the provisions of sections 97 and 100 of the Railways Act, 1989 under which the railways cannot be held liable for compensation … those of Unionof India and Ors. Vs. J.S. Kunwar [1 2010 CPJ 90 (NC)] and Unionof India and Ors. Vs. Sanjiv Dilsukhraj Dave and Anr.

Selvi J. Jayalalitha Vs. State Rep by Addl. Superintendent of Police, ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 -- Sections 91, 147, 173, 227, 239 and 240; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 -- Sections 21, 22, 24, 25, 43, 109, 120, 139, 159, 169, 403, 405, 407, 408, 409, 415 and 420; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 -- Sections 5(1) and 13(1); Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 -- Sections 5; Companies Act, 1956; Constitution of India -- Article 13(3) and 21; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 -- Order 21, Rule 73; Cattle Trespass Act, 1871 -- Sections 19; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 -- Sections 136; Railway Act, 1989 -- Sections 83, 84, 85 and 189; General Clauses Act, 1897 -- Sections 3(38)

Reported in : 2001CriLJ3074; 2000(2)CTC116

claiming by or through him, any actionable claims so dealt with by him as aforesaid.'Section 189 of the Railways Act, 1989 says-'Railway servants not to engage in trade.--A railway servant shall not- (a) purchase or bid for, either in … shares with others, any property put to auction under Section 83 or Section 84 or Section 85, or Section 90' or (b) in contravention of any direction of the railway administration in this behalf, engage in trade'27. Such

Syndicate Bank Vs. Sudhir Surgicals and Allied Industries and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : BankingCommercial

Reported in : [1991]72CompCas555(Kar); ILR1991KAR3173

and circumstances of the case, there will be no order as to costs in this appeal. - INDIAN RAILWAYS ACT (24 OF 1989) Sections 59 & 51(2): [P.D. Dinakaran, C.J. & K.L. Manjunath, J] Supply of tickets Petitioner … there will be no order as to costs in this appeal. - INDIAN RAILWAYS ACT (24 OF 1989) Sections 59 & 51(2): [P.D. Dinakaran, C.J. & K.L. Manjunath, J] Supply of tickets Petitioner being holder of first … of you promised to pay the amounts due to the bank within 90 days, the fourth of you have failed to do so.'26. The expression

Smt. Narayani Bai Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railway Accidents (Compensation) Rules, 1989; Railway Accidents and Untoward Incidents (Compensation) Rules, 1990; Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 82C; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 200; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 23

Reported in : III(2004)ACC753; 2005ACJ1909; 2004(1)MPHT246; 2004(1)MPLJ319

date of passing of the order ought to have been applied by the Tribunal. According to him, the Railways Act, 1989 was in force when the order was passed by the Tribunal and the Indian Railways Act, 1890 was … Bench Bhopal (hereinafter referred to as 'Tribunal') in Case No. 686/90, the appellant has preferred this appeal under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987.2. Sans unnecessary details the facts lie in a narrow compass

Anwar at Arvind Ramkrishna Vs. Shehnaz Sani.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

had added her name in the said agreement, however it is noticed that in letter dated 7th March, 1989, Exhibit 90, the wife came out with the stand that her name was added by the Developer. 13.According … amount would be paid to the builder as loan in the first instance and at the time of actual transaction, the consideration would be paid. As per this arrangement, a sum of Rs.3,85,000/- was paid to the … M.J.Petition A-1945 of 1992 at Family Court at Mumbai for divorce under Section 13(1)(ia) and (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act and had claimed maintenance

Anwar @ Arvind Ramkrishna Mudbhatkal Vs. Shehnaz Sani

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 40 Rule 1; Hindu Marriage Act - Section 13(1)(ia) and (ib); Maharashtra Co- operative Societies Act 1960 - Section 2(19)(a), 27(1)

had added her name in the said agreement, however it is noticed that in letter dated 7th March, 1989, Exhibit 90, the wife came out with the stand that her name was added by the Developer. 13.According … amount would be paid to the builder as loan in the first instance and at the time of actual transaction, the consideration would be paid. As per this arrangement, a sum of Rs.3,85,000/- was paid to the … M.J.Petition A-1945 of 1992 at Family Court at Mumbai for divorce under Section 13(1)(ia) and (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act and had claimed maintenance