Advanced Search Results

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Orissa State Electricity Board and ors.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 17; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5 and 14

Reported in : 2002ACJ430; 90(2000)CLT639

shall also exercise on and from the date of commencement of the provisions of Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989 (24 of 1989), all such jurisdiction, powers and authority as were exercisable immediately before that date by any … Orissa High Court reported in AIR 1987 Orissa 149 (Union of India v. Aluminium Industries Limited) and (2000) 89 Cut LT 425 (Union of India v. Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. and the decision of the Madhya Pradesh

Mohd. Islam Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302; Arms Act - Sections 25 and 27; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 6; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 161, 218, 313 and 464

Reported in : 1993CriLJ1736

the judgment and order dated 19-9-1990 of VIII Addl. Sessions Judge, Varanasi in Sessions Trial No. 182 of 1989 and Sessions Trial No. 267 of 1989 whereby he has been convicted under Section 302, IPC and has … and has been sentenced to death in the former sessions trial and under Section 25/27 of the Arms Act for which he has been sentenced to 1 year's R.I. in the latter sessions trial. The Addl. Sessions

Smt. Narayani Bai Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railway Accidents (Compensation) Rules, 1989; Railway Accidents and Untoward Incidents (Compensation) Rules, 1990; Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 82C; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 200; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 23

Reported in : III(2004)ACC753; 2005ACJ1909; 2004(1)MPHT246; 2004(1)MPLJ319

date of passing of the order ought to have been applied by the Tribunal. According to him, the Railways Act, 1989 was in force when the order was passed by the Tribunal and the Indian Railways Act, 1890 was … Bench Bhopal (hereinafter referred to as 'Tribunal') in Case No. 686/90, the appellant has preferred this appeal under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987.2. Sans unnecessary details the facts lie in a narrow compass

Thomas John vs the Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Kerala

was in pursuance to clause 14 of the notification dated 20.06.2012 Ext.P3.4. As per Section 2(31) of the Railways Act, 1989‘Railways’ means a railway or any portion of a railway for WP(C) NO. 19968 OF 2016 -6- the public

Commissioner of Customs (Air), Chennai Vs. P. Sinnasamy and Another

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Chaudhary v. Director General, Doordarshan and others reported in 1989 1 SCC 89, the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that exercise of discretion should be legitimate, … of goods. Consignment of Ethyle Hexanol (EHA) was transported to bonded warehouses, after assessment to duty in October-November, 1989 and subsequently, the goods were removed from the bonded warehouse, without the permission of the proper officer. Referring … (Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 130(1) of the Customs Act, 1962, against the Final Order No.455 of 2007, dated 20.04.2007, on the file of Customs, Excise and Service

Ashok Kumar Singh and Anr Vs. Union of India Through the General Manag ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

to the expression " accidental falling a passenger from a train carrying passengers" in Section 123(c) to the Railways Act, we will depriving a large number of railway passengers from getting compensation in railway accident. It is well … passenger as alleged ? (ii) Whether any untoward incident as defined under section 123 (c)(2) of the Railway Act, 1989 occurred to Manish Kumar ,S/o Sri Ashok Kumar Singh while travelling in Train no. 2802 DN New Delhi-Puri- … IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI. Misc. Appeal No. 89 of 2015 1. Ashok Kumar Singh 2. Smt. Kalawati Singh, both R/o

Umesh Chand Srivastava, Asstt. Engineer, Pwd Barkot Vs. Habib Ahmad an ...

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : [2007(115)FLR476]

any person [***] who is-(i) A railway servant as defined in [clause (34) of Section 2 of the Railways Act, 1989 (24 of 1989)] not permanently employed in any administrative, district or sub-divisional office of a railway and not … Srivastnva. The Workmen's Compensation Commissioner allowed the application vide order dated 26.6.1992 and awarded a sum of Rs. 89,084/- as compensation along with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of accident.3. Feeling aggrieved the present

Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Civil

of other immovable properties, forest produce, annual net profit of tramways or railways and the remaining amount is to be deposited in the consolidated fund … to remedy the situation created by the Supreme Court judgment aforesaid and enacted West Bengal Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1989 amending the offending provision of the Bengal Acts declared ultra vires by the Supreme Court. The vires of … group of writ applications under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India necessitate a consideration:(1) Whether Section 89(1) of the Bihar Coal Mining Area Development Authority Act, 1986 (Bihar Act 9 of 1986) (hereinafter to be

M/s. Raj Shipping and Another Vs. The State of Maharashtra, Through th ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Miscellaneous

(iii) Local authorities; (iv) Port Trusts; (iva) Public Charitable Trust; (v) Railway Administration as defined under the Indian Railways Act, 1989 (24 of 1989) and Konkan Railway Corporation Limited; (vi) Incorporated or unincorporated societies, clubs or other associations of … one of the illustrative copy of such an agreement. Pages 86 to 89 of the paper book read as under: âLeighton Contractors, (India) Pvt. Ltd. … the MVAT Act. 18. The Respondent No. 1 has issued Notification No.VAT.1506/ CR-135-B/Taxation-1 dated 30.11.2006 in terms of Section 41(4)(b) of the MVAT Act, 2002 exempting the sales of motor spirit made at the retail outlet. Accordingly,

C& C Construction Ltd vs.ircon International Ltd

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

deputation are also managed by the Railways.19. RVNL is also a "railway administration" under the provisions of the Railways Act, 1989. Keeping the totality of circumstances in view, it would be very difficult to accept that RVNL should not … & Mr.Mohit D. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA Ram, Advs. NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 14 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’) has been filed by