Advanced Search Results

Bengaluru Metro Rail Corporation Ltd vs Assistant Labour Commissioner ...

Court : Karnataka

1978 in respect of words - 19 -and expressions, used but not defined in the Act, 2002.(ix) The Railways Act, 1989 which repealed the Act, 1890 does not define the expression “railway company”.(x) Though the Act, 1890 is repealed … Which is the “appropriate government” for BMRCL in relation to any Industrial Dispute?(ii) Whether the State Government under Section 2(n)(vi) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Act, 1947) - 11 - can notify the services of Bangalore … in good faith extends to Central Government, metro railway administration, and officials. 89(1) Metro railway property cannot be taken in execution of decree without previous

Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Ltd vs Government of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

1978 in respect of words - 19 -and expressions, used but not defined in the Act, 2002.(ix) The Railways Act, 1989 which repealed the Act, 1890 does not define the expression “railway company”.(x) Though the Act, 1890 is repealed … Which is the “appropriate government” for BMRCL in relation to any Industrial Dispute?(ii) Whether the State Government under Section 2(n)(vi) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Act, 1947) - 11 - can notify the services of Bangalore … in good faith extends to Central Government, metro railway administration, and officials. 89(1) Metro railway property cannot be taken in execution of decree without previous

M/S Bangalore Metro Rail vs Union of India

Court : Karnataka

1978 in respect of words - 19 -and expressions, used but not defined in the Act, 2002.(ix) The Railways Act, 1989 which repealed the Act, 1890 does not define the expression “railway company”.(x) Though the Act, 1890 is repealed … Which is the “appropriate government” for BMRCL in relation to any Industrial Dispute?(ii) Whether the State Government under Section 2(n)(vi) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Act, 1947) - 11 - can notify the services of Bangalore … in good faith extends to Central Government, metro railway administration, and officials. 89(1) Metro railway property cannot be taken in execution of decree without previous

Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Ltd vs Government of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

1978 in respect of words - 19 -and expressions, used but not defined in the Act, 2002.(ix) The Railways Act, 1989 which repealed the Act, 1890 does not define the expression “railway company”.(x) Though the Act, 1890 is repealed … Which is the “appropriate government” for BMRCL in relation to any Industrial Dispute?(ii) Whether the State Government under Section 2(n)(vi) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Act, 1947) - 11 - can notify the services of Bangalore … in good faith extends to Central Government, metro railway administration, and officials. 89(1) Metro railway property cannot be taken in execution of decree without previous

Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Ltd vs Bangalore Metro Rail Corporati ...

Court : Karnataka

1978 in respect of words - 19 -and expressions, used but not defined in the Act, 2002.(ix) The Railways Act, 1989 which repealed the Act, 1890 does not define the expression “railway company”.(x) Though the Act, 1890 is repealed … Which is the “appropriate government” for BMRCL in relation to any Industrial Dispute?(ii) Whether the State Government under Section 2(n)(vi) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Act, 1947) - 11 - can notify the services of Bangalore … in good faith extends to Central Government, metro railway administration, and officials. 89(1) Metro railway property cannot be taken in execution of decree without previous

M/S Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Limited vs Assistant Labout Commi ...

Court : Karnataka

1978 in respect of words - 19 -and expressions, used but not defined in the Act, 2002.(ix) The Railways Act, 1989 which repealed the Act, 1890 does not define the expression “railway company”.(x) Though the Act, 1890 is repealed … Which is the “appropriate government” for BMRCL in relation to any Industrial Dispute?(ii) Whether the State Government under Section 2(n)(vi) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Act, 1947) - 11 - can notify the services of Bangalore … in good faith extends to Central Government, metro railway administration, and officials. 89(1) Metro railway property cannot be taken in execution of decree without previous

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Orissa State Electricity Board and ors.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 17; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5 and 14

Reported in : 2002ACJ430; 90(2000)CLT639

shall also exercise on and from the date of commencement of the provisions of Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989 (24 of 1989), all such jurisdiction, powers and authority as were exercisable immediately before that date by any … Orissa High Court reported in AIR 1987 Orissa 149 (Union of India v. Aluminium Industries Limited) and (2000) 89 Cut LT 425 (Union of India v. Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. and the decision of the Madhya Pradesh

Mohd. Islam Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302; Arms Act - Sections 25 and 27; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 6; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 161, 218, 313 and 464

Reported in : 1993CriLJ1736

the judgment and order dated 19-9-1990 of VIII Addl. Sessions Judge, Varanasi in Sessions Trial No. 182 of 1989 and Sessions Trial No. 267 of 1989 whereby he has been convicted under Section 302, IPC and has … and has been sentenced to death in the former sessions trial and under Section 25/27 of the Arms Act for which he has been sentenced to 1 year's R.I. in the latter sessions trial. The Addl. Sessions

Arokya Das @ Das Chinna Cowry Chinna @ Chinna Savari vs State of Karna ...

Court : Karnataka

QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.89/2019 ARISING OUT OF CR.NO.1269/2017 FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 147, 145(b), 174a OF RAILWAYS ACT, 1989 OF POSTCOMMANDER/RAILWAY PROTECTION FORCE (INSPECTOR) RAILWAY PROTECTION FORCE (RPF) BANGARPET, BANGALORE DIVISION, SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY, BANGARPET, KOLAR DISTRICT … this Court calling in question proceedings in C.C.No.89/2019 arising out of Crime No.1269/2017 for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 145(b) 174a of Railways Act, 1989 of Post Commander/Railway Protection Force (Inspector)/Railway Protection Force (RPF), Bangarpet, -4-

Smt. Narayani Bai Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railway Accidents (Compensation) Rules, 1989; Railway Accidents and Untoward Incidents (Compensation) Rules, 1990; Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 82C; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 200; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 23

Reported in : III(2004)ACC753; 2005ACJ1909; 2004(1)MPHT246; 2004(1)MPLJ319

date of passing of the order ought to have been applied by the Tribunal. According to him, the Railways Act, 1989 was in force when the order was passed by the Tribunal and the Indian Railways Act, 1890 was … Bench Bhopal (hereinafter referred to as 'Tribunal') in Case No. 686/90, the appellant has preferred this appeal under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987.2. Sans unnecessary details the facts lie in a narrow compass