Advanced Search Results

Sh. Mohd Rahees vs Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

in a train. The claim petition was filed invoking the provisions of Sections 123(c) and 124-A of the Railways Act, 1989.3. It was the case of the claimant before the Tribunal that on 17.11.2018,he had purchased a valid mail/express … The Tribunal was, therefore, not(2019) 3 SCC 572 2021 SCC OnLine Bom 88 19:40:57 FAO 261/2022 Page 5 of 8 justified in rejecting the claim … accordingly. CM APPL. 26822/20241. By way of the present application filed under Order XXII Rule 9 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 the applicants seek setting aside of the abatement of the

Vivek Re-rolling Mills Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1994)LC562Tri(Delhi)

of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and the Board once again clarified that re-rollable materials purchased from railways could be deemed as angles, shapes, sections of iron and non-alloy steel appearing in Column 2 of the … Supreme Court judgment in the case of Collector of C. Excise v. Chemphar Drugs & Liniments, reported in 1989 (40) E.L.T. 276, the Collector's order invoking the extended period was not sustainable. He further contended that the … invoking the extended period of limitation in terms of the proviso to Section 11A on the grounds that the appellants had suppressed material facts from

Union Of India Vs. M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

ANALYSIS .............................................................................................. 22 i. Relevant Statutory Scheme and Provisions .............................................. 22 ii. Scope of Section 106 of the Railways Act, 1989 ........................................ 29 a. What is meant by an “Overcharge”?. ....................................................... 35 b. Concept of an ‘Overcharge’ and an … below: - Figure 1: Distance Table as per the Old Methodology Civil Appeal No(s). 1891-1966 of 2024 Page 88 of 95 In the above distance table: -  “. .” indicates the Originating Point, i.e., the station

Bengaluru Metro Rail Corporation Ltd vs Assistant Labour Commissioner ...

Court : Karnataka

1978 in respect of words - 19 -and expressions, used but not defined in the Act, 2002.(ix) The Railways Act, 1989 which repealed the Act, 1890 does not define the expression “railway company”.(x) Though the Act, 1890 is repealed … No non-Government metro railway shall work without obtaining permission from Central Government. 88 Protection from legal proceedings for actions in good faith extends to Central … Which is the “appropriate government” for BMRCL in relation to any Industrial Dispute?(ii) Whether the State Government under Section 2(n)(vi) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Act, 1947) - 11 - can notify the services of Bangalore

Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Ltd vs Government of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

1978 in respect of words - 19 -and expressions, used but not defined in the Act, 2002.(ix) The Railways Act, 1989 which repealed the Act, 1890 does not define the expression “railway company”.(x) Though the Act, 1890 is repealed … No non-Government metro railway shall work without obtaining permission from Central Government. 88 Protection from legal proceedings for actions in good faith extends to Central … Which is the “appropriate government” for BMRCL in relation to any Industrial Dispute?(ii) Whether the State Government under Section 2(n)(vi) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Act, 1947) - 11 - can notify the services of Bangalore

Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Ltd vs Bangalore Metro Rail Corporati ...

Court : Karnataka

1978 in respect of words - 19 -and expressions, used but not defined in the Act, 2002.(ix) The Railways Act, 1989 which repealed the Act, 1890 does not define the expression “railway company”.(x) Though the Act, 1890 is repealed … No non-Government metro railway shall work without obtaining permission from Central Government. 88 Protection from legal proceedings for actions in good faith extends to Central … Which is the “appropriate government” for BMRCL in relation to any Industrial Dispute?(ii) Whether the State Government under Section 2(n)(vi) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Act, 1947) - 11 - can notify the services of Bangalore

M/S Bangalore Metro Rail vs Union of India

Court : Karnataka

1978 in respect of words - 19 -and expressions, used but not defined in the Act, 2002.(ix) The Railways Act, 1989 which repealed the Act, 1890 does not define the expression “railway company”.(x) Though the Act, 1890 is repealed … No non-Government metro railway shall work without obtaining permission from Central Government. 88 Protection from legal proceedings for actions in good faith extends to Central … Which is the “appropriate government” for BMRCL in relation to any Industrial Dispute?(ii) Whether the State Government under Section 2(n)(vi) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Act, 1947) - 11 - can notify the services of Bangalore

M/S Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Limited vs Assistant Labout Commi ...

Court : Karnataka

1978 in respect of words - 19 -and expressions, used but not defined in the Act, 2002.(ix) The Railways Act, 1989 which repealed the Act, 1890 does not define the expression “railway company”.(x) Though the Act, 1890 is repealed … No non-Government metro railway shall work without obtaining permission from Central Government. 88 Protection from legal proceedings for actions in good faith extends to Central … Which is the “appropriate government” for BMRCL in relation to any Industrial Dispute?(ii) Whether the State Government under Section 2(n)(vi) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Act, 1947) - 11 - can notify the services of Bangalore

Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Ltd vs Government of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

1978 in respect of words - 19 -and expressions, used but not defined in the Act, 2002.(ix) The Railways Act, 1989 which repealed the Act, 1890 does not define the expression “railway company”.(x) Though the Act, 1890 is repealed … No non-Government metro railway shall work without obtaining permission from Central Government. 88 Protection from legal proceedings for actions in good faith extends to Central … Which is the “appropriate government” for BMRCL in relation to any Industrial Dispute?(ii) Whether the State Government under Section 2(n)(vi) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Act, 1947) - 11 - can notify the services of Bangalore

Union of India versus M/S Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2024] 3 S.C.R. 1051

The following questions arise for consideration: (i) What is the scope of Section 106 sub-section (3) of the Railways Act, 1989; In other words, what constitutes an “overcharge” within the meaning of Section 106 sub-section (3) of the Railways … Edn., 1997 at Pg. 1389; P Ramanatha Aiyar’s ‘The Law Lexicon’ (Vol I, 6th Edn., 2019 at pg. 886); L.P. Singh and P.K. Majumdar’s ‘Judicial Dictionary’ (2nd Edn., 2005 at pg. 460); Henry Campbell Black in ‘Black’s