Advanced Search Results

Sh. Mohd Rahees vs Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

in a train. The claim petition was filed invoking the provisions of Sections 123(c) and 124-A of the Railways Act, 1989.3. It was the case of the claimant before the Tribunal that on 17.11.2018,he had purchased a valid mail/express … The Tribunal was, therefore, not(2019) 3 SCC 572 2021 SCC OnLine Bom 88 19:40:57 FAO 261/2022 Page 5 of 8 justified in rejecting the claim … accordingly. CM APPL. 26822/20241. By way of the present application filed under Order XXII Rule 9 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 the applicants seek setting aside of the abatement of the

Vivek Re-rolling Mills Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1994)LC562Tri(Delhi)

of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and the Board once again clarified that re-rollable materials purchased from railways could be deemed as angles, shapes, sections of iron and non-alloy steel appearing in Column 2 of the … Supreme Court judgment in the case of Collector of C. Excise v. Chemphar Drugs & Liniments, reported in 1989 (40) E.L.T. 276, the Collector's order invoking the extended period was not sustainable. He further contended that the … invoking the extended period of limitation in terms of the proviso to Section 11A on the grounds that the appellants had suppressed material facts from

Union Of India Vs. M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

ANALYSIS .............................................................................................. 22 i. Relevant Statutory Scheme and Provisions .............................................. 22 ii. Scope of Section 106 of the Railways Act, 1989 ........................................ 29 a. What is meant by an “Overcharge”?. ....................................................... 35 b. Concept of an ‘Overcharge’ and an … below: - Figure 1: Distance Table as per the Old Methodology Civil Appeal No(s). 1891-1966 of 2024 Page 88 of 95 In the above distance table: -  “. .” indicates the Originating Point, i.e., the station

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Satish Patidar and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 17, 123, 123C and 124A; Railways (Amendment) Act, 1994; Railways Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 17 and 17(1)

Reported in : 2003ACJ2081; AIR2003MP205; 2003(4)MPLJ306

is barred by limitation. It was also contended by the Union of India that Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act of 1989), providing for compensation on account of an untoward incident was

Nareshbhai Bhagubhai Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

been filed is as under :3. 1. On 08.02.2011, a Notification was issued under Section 20A of the Railways Act, 1989 [hereinafter referred to as “the said Act”]. by the Ministry of Railways notifying its intention to acquire the … between 30.07.2011 to 18.08.2011 and 21.10.2011 to 03.01.2012 and alongwith the objections raised by the petitioners, in total 88 objectors are given opportunity of hearing in the aforementioned time period, and as the date qua the present

Rail Land Development Authority vs.yantti Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

under:-"8. RLDA has been constituted by the Central Government in exercise of powers under Section 4 of the Railways Act, 1989, with the object of undertaking development of vacant land of Railways on its behalf. The objective being to

Rail Land Development Authority vs.yantti Buildcon Pvt Ltd

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

under:-"8. RLDA has been constituted by the Central Government in exercise of powers under Section 4 of the Railways Act, 1989, with the object of undertaking development of vacant land of Railways on its behalf. The objective being to

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Iisco and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80; Indian Railways Act 1989 - Sections 76 and 94(2)

Reported in : I(2005)ACC862; 117(2005)DLT458

record. I find that the contentions of learned counsel is quite contrary to Section 94(2) of the Indian Railways Act 1989 contained therein. Even otherwise the question over here is one of fact which has been determined on the

Satyabir and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through Secretary, Ministry ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 2009ACJ2093; (2008)3PLR185

subsequently discharged. An information regarding the incident was sent by Station Master, Railway Station Rohtak to SHO Government railways Police Rohtak vide memo No. 57/88/04 dated 21.5.2004. The information regarding death of Smt. Santosh was also sent … working under Chief Claims Officer deals claim cases strictly in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Railway Act, 1989. So far as the compensation cases involving loss of life and injuries are concerned, compensation is awarded by … to fix responsibility for the mishap. FIR No. 106 dated 30.5.2004 under Section 175 of the Railway Act and Section 304A of the Indian Penal

Hariman Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : RLW2009(4)Raj3681

was acquitted form offence under Sections 397, 394, 325, 324/34 and 323/34 1PC. And Section 145 of Indian Railways Act, 1989 and accused-respondent Lohare Lal was acquitted from the offence under Sections 397, 394, 325, 324/34 and 323/34 IPC … the order dated January 24, 2002 of Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track) Gangapur City in Sessions Case No. 88 of 2001 whereby accused respondent Nemi Lal @ Nemichand was acquitted form offence under Sections 397, 394, 325,