Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: railways act 1989 section 86 · Page 1 of about 403 results (0.097 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 24 2011

South Central Railway Vs. Suchi Singh and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on : Aug-24-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

and other items in the theft that said to have taken place. By virtue of Section 2(32) of Railways Act, 1989 each zone of the railways has to be impleaded, and that complainant cannot claim deficiency in service on … was deficiency and awarded compensation, [see Union of India through E.C. Railway v. Alok Kumar, III (2007) CPJ 86 (NC)]. Equally it was held that non-availability of TTE in reserved compartment was deficiency in service [see Union

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 13 2008

Gujarat Urja Vikash Nigam Ltd. Vs. Essar Power Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-13-2008

Subject : ArbitrationElectricity

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2(3), 11, 11(5) and 11(6); Gujarat Electricity Industry (Reorganization and Regulation) Act, 2003; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 79, 79(1), 86(1), 94(2), 158, 173, 174 and 175; Consumer Protection Act, 1986; Atomic Energy Act, 1962; Railways Act, 1989; Mimansa Rules; State Grid Code; Constitution of India - Article 14; Arbitration and Conciliation Ordinance, 1996

Reported in : AIR2008SC1921; 2008(2)ARBLR1(SC); 2008(2)AWC1238(SC); (2008)2CompLJ357(SC); 2008(4)CTC539; 2008LC(SC)1; (2008)3GLR2246(SC); JT2008(3)SC336; (2008)4MLJ573(SC); (2008)4SCC75; 2008AIRSCW2169

Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (68 of 1986) or the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 (33 of 1962) or the Railways Act, 1989 (24 of 1989).11. Mr. K.K. Venugopal submitted that a joint reading of these provisions indicates that ordinarily the … Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission, Ahmedabad (hereinafter in short 'the Commission') by Application No. 873 of 2005 made under Section 86(1)(f) of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter in short 'the Act of 2003').8. Since the Nigam did not send

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 25 2022

Nkgsb Cooperative Bank Limited Vs. Subir Chakravarty

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-25-2022

Subject : Land Acquisition

Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988; Section 93 (“by an officer or authority subordinate to the Central Government”) of the Railways Act, 1989; Section 6 (“such other officer subordinate to the Director General”) and Section 15 (“an officer subordinate to the Director … to him”) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013; Section 86 (“any officer subordinate to the Board”) of the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014; Section 5 (“any other officer

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 12 2005

Action Committee for Resolving Gujarat Salt Manufactures Vs. Union of ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-12-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 10, 64(3), 65(2), 72, 72(1), 72(2), 72(3), 72(4), 73, 73(1), 83 to 85 and 86; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 - Sections 23(1); Employees' Provident Funds etc. Act, 1952; Customs Act, 1962; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Railways (Punitive Charges for Overloading of Wagon) Rules, 1990 - Rule 161A; Standard of Weights and Measures (Enforcement) Act, 1985; Weighment of Consignment (in Wagon Load or Train load) Rules, 1990 - Rule 4; Railways Punitive Charges for Overload of Wagons (Amendment) Rules, 2004

Reported in : (2005)1GLR889

consignor to pay penal freight, unloading charges, detention charges in exercise of power under Section 73 of the Railways Act 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Railways Act'). It has been stated in the said communication of demand notices … to challenge the said action before the appropriate forum. At this stage the reference may be made to Section 86 of the Act which reads as under:'Notwithstanding anything contained in this Chapter, the right of sale under Secs.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 2013

State of MaharashtrA. Vs. Kamal Ahmed Mohammed Vakil Ansari and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-14-2013

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - 302, 307, 326, 427, 436, 20A, 120B, 123, 124, 34; ndian Explosives Act; Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act; Indian Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 151, 152, 153, 154; Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 - Sections 10, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 40; Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 - Sections 3(1)(i), 3(2), 3(4); Passports Act, 1967 - Section 12(1)(c); Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 6, 11, 5 to 16, 26, 30, 30(b), 31

the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984, read with Sections 151, 152, 153, 154 of the Railways Act, 1989, read with Section 12(1)(c) of the Passports Act, 1967.3. The prosecution case (in Special Case No.21 of 2006)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 2013

State of Maharashtra Vs. Kamal Ahmed Mohd. Vakil Ansari and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-14-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984, read with Sections 151, 152, 153, 154 of the Railways Act, 1989, read with Section 12(1)(c) of the Passports Act, 1967.3. The prosecution case (in Special Case No.21 of 2006)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 17 2006

Shah Jayantilal Jivraj and Co. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) Owning Sou ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : May-17-2006

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 81, 82(1), 84 and 85; Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 21; Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 54, 55 and 56A

Reported in : IV(2006)ACC236; 2006(3)CTC438; (2006)3MLJ99

either a Judicial Member or a Member (Technical). He would contend that as per Section 81 of the Railways Act 1989, where the consignment arrives in a damaged condition or shows signs of having been tampered with and the … the goods were unloaded, it was found that 70 bundles are being received in a good condition and 86 bundles were damaged by water and 15 bundles were missing. The appellant has received the 70 bundles. With

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 03 2025

Bengaluru Metro Rail Corporation Ltd vs Assistant Labour Commissioner ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-03-2025

1978 in respect of words - 19 -and expressions, used but not defined in the Act, 2002.(ix) The Railways Act, 1989 which repealed the Act, 1890 does not define the expression “railway company”.(x) Though the Act, 1890 is repealed … by notification, specify metro railway properties for which damage/destruction attracts enhanced penalty. 86 Metro railway administration (including non- Government) bound by directions on policy questions … Which is the “appropriate government” for BMRCL in relation to any Industrial Dispute?(ii) Whether the State Government under Section 2(n)(vi) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Act, 1947) - 11 - can notify the services of Bangalore

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 03 2025

Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Ltd vs Government of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-03-2025

1978 in respect of words - 19 -and expressions, used but not defined in the Act, 2002.(ix) The Railways Act, 1989 which repealed the Act, 1890 does not define the expression “railway company”.(x) Though the Act, 1890 is repealed … by notification, specify metro railway properties for which damage/destruction attracts enhanced penalty. 86 Metro railway administration (including non- Government) bound by directions on policy questions … Which is the “appropriate government” for BMRCL in relation to any Industrial Dispute?(ii) Whether the State Government under Section 2(n)(vi) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Act, 1947) - 11 - can notify the services of Bangalore

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 03 2025

Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Ltd vs Bangalore Metro Rail Corporati ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-03-2025

1978 in respect of words - 19 -and expressions, used but not defined in the Act, 2002.(ix) The Railways Act, 1989 which repealed the Act, 1890 does not define the expression “railway company”.(x) Though the Act, 1890 is repealed … by notification, specify metro railway properties for which damage/destruction attracts enhanced penalty. 86 Metro railway administration (including non- Government) bound by directions on policy questions … Which is the “appropriate government” for BMRCL in relation to any Industrial Dispute?(ii) Whether the State Government under Section 2(n)(vi) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Act, 1947) - 11 - can notify the services of Bangalore

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial