Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: railways act 1989 section 84 · Page 1 of about 327 results (0.035 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 06 2004

Jayaswals Neco Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-06-2004

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Railway Claims Tribunal Act; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 83 and 84

Reported in : 114(2004)DLT178

the present writ petition challenging the same as arbitrary, unreasonable and contrary to the provisions of the Indian Railways Act, 1989. The petitioner's case primarily is that the consignments in question having been transported after permission had been obtained … from it, failing which the railways threatened to exercise its lien over the petitioner's goods in terms of Section 83 and 84 of the Indian Railways Act. Aggrieved by the said demands, the petitioner company has filed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 17 2006

Shah Jayantilal Jivraj and Co. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) Owning Sou ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : May-17-2006

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 81, 82(1), 84 and 85; Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 21; Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 54, 55 and 56A

Reported in : IV(2006)ACC236; 2006(3)CTC438; (2006)3MLJ99

either a Judicial Member or a Member (Technical). He would contend that as per Section 81 of the Railways Act 1989, where the consignment arrives in a damaged condition or shows signs of having been tampered with and the … take delivery of the consignment or part thereof nothwithstanding that such consignment or part thereof is damaged. Under Section 84 of the Railways Act if a person fails to take delivery of any consignment or any part thereof,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 13 2000

Selvi J. Jayalalitha Vs. State Rep by Addl. Superintendent of Police, ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-13-2000

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 -- Sections 91, 147, 173, 227, 239 and 240; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 -- Sections 21, 22, 24, 25, 43, 109, 120, 139, 159, 169, 403, 405, 407, 408, 409, 415 and 420; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 -- Sections 5(1) and 13(1); Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 -- Sections 5; Companies Act, 1956; Constitution of India -- Article 13(3) and 21; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 -- Order 21, Rule 73; Cattle Trespass Act, 1871 -- Sections 19; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 -- Sections 136; Railway Act, 1989 -- Sections 83, 84, 85 and 189; General Clauses Act, 1897 -- Sections 3(38)

Reported in : 2001CriLJ3074; 2000(2)CTC116

claiming by or through him, any actionable claims so dealt with by him as aforesaid.'Section 189 of the Railways Act, 1989 says-'Railway servants not to engage in trade.--A railway servant shall not- (a) purchase or bid for, either in … of another, or jointly or in shares with others, any property put to auction under Section 83 or Section 84 or Section 85, or Section 90' or (b) in contravention of any direction of the railway administration in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 20 2016

Anil Khirwal Vs. South Eastern Railway and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Apr-20-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

ore through the public auction, as per Railway Commercial Manual, Volume-II read with Section 84 of the Railway Act, 1989. It appears that in view of the aforesaid decision, the respondents published an auction notice in daily news

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 2024

Union Of India Vs. M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-21-2024

Subject : Land Acquisition

ANALYSIS .............................................................................................. 22 i. Relevant Statutory Scheme and Provisions .............................................. 22 ii. Scope of Section 106 of the Railways Act, 1989 ........................................ 29 a. What is meant by an “Overcharge”?. ....................................................... 35 b. Concept of an ‘Overcharge’ and an … by the High Court of Allahabad in FAO Nos. 726, 730-739, 765, 772-793, 798-814, 825-826, 829- 830, 833-842, 844-848, and 850-855 respectively of 2014, by which the High Court allowed all the abovementioned appeals filed by the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 08 2000

Ramakrishna Steel Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-08-2000

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 38, 83, 84 and 99; General Rules - Rule 152

Reported in : I(2001)ACC194

(d) and Clause (h) of Section 46-C'. 16. Section 99 is the corresponding provision under the present Indian Railways Act, 1989 and it is the same as Section 77 of the old Act, except for the omission of Sub-section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 18 2017

M/S Global Carrying India vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-18-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

non-compliance of giving the requisite notice within six months of overcharging as required by Section 106(3) of the Railways Act, 1989. Putting it in other words if for arising of a valid claim in law against the Railways, and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 1994

Twenty First Century Printers Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Jul-29-1994

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1995)LC117Tri(Delhi)

another case Collector of Central Excise, Kanpur v. Krishna Carbon Paper Co., 1988 (37) E.L.T. 480 (S.C.) = 1989 (20) ECR 273 (SC), Supreme Court pointed out the circumstances when ISI specifications can be relied upon. It … or copies per hour with DCP Platen under Clauses (d) and (m) of Section 111 of the Customs Act, 1962, imposing a fine in lieu of confiscation of Rs. 60,00,000/- and determination the classification of the machine … of Rs. 60,00,000/- and determination the classification of the machine under Heading 84.79 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and denial

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 19 1991

N. and W. Ry. Vs. TraIn Dispatchers

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Mar-19-1991

Subject : Land Acquisition

adverse effect on competition among rail carriers in the affected region." [ Footnote 2 ] On September 9, 1989, the Commission also filed a petition for rehearing, and requested the court to refrain from ruling on the … has approved a rail carrier consolidation under the conditions set forth in Chapter 113 of the Interstate Commerce Act (Act), 49 U.S.C. § 11301 et seq., a carrier in such a consolidation "is exempt from the antitrust … such as those governing contracts, the court declined to decide whether the section could operate to override provisions of the Railway Labor Act (RLA) governing … York Dock Railway Control -- Brooklyn Eastern Dist. Terminal, 360 I.C.C. 60, 84-90, aff'd, sub nom. New York Dock Railway v. United States, 609 F.2d

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 13 2005

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd. and an ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-13-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 72, 72(3), 73, 77, 77C, 77C(4), 78 and 78B; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 200; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 78B and 80; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 200; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 151, 152 and 161; Carriers Act, 1865; Explosive Rules; Tariff Rules

Reported in : 2005(5)ALD85

elaboration and the same had been dealt with in detail by the Trial Court. Section 200 of the Railways Act, 1989 (Act No. 24 of 1989) had repealed the Indian Railways Act, 1890. However, the said Act came into

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial