Advanced Search Results

Sr. Divisional Commercial Manager Vs. Intelligence Officer

Court : Kerala

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 3(1), 3(1A), 5, 27, 28, 29, 29(2), 29A, 29A(4), 30, 30(1), 30A, 30B, 30C, 30E, 31, 31A(2), 32, 45A, 45A(1) and 46; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 61, 62, 64, 65, 66, 67, 74, 75, 80, 93 and 97; Kerala General Sales Tax Rules, 1963 - Rules 37 and 58; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 5, Rule 27; Railways Rules

Reported in : 2006(1)KLT834; (2007)8VST434(Ker)

under the Sales Tax Act. Carriage of goods by railway is dealt with in Chapter IX of the Railways Act, 1989. Section 61 states that every railway administration shall maintain, at each station and at such other places where goods … failed to consider the binding effect of various provisions of the Railways Act, such an Sections 65, 74, 75 and 80 etc. Counsel also submitted that the learned single Judge was not justified in directing the Railways

Ningesh Vs. Nanjegowda

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

2nd Method of determining compensation - 58 by applying the criteria for compensation awarded for accidents under the Railways Act, 1989. 11.1 Table 2 - lumpsum compensation 60 determined per the Railways Act by compounding the inflation rates.12. The … their children under 4 K. Kumar v. Smt. Leena & Anr., AIR2010Kar 75. 5 Chandi Samuval v. Saimon Samual, MAT.APPEAL No.782 of 2022.-. 21 - … …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. C.R.RAVISHANKAR., FOR SRI. K.SURYANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R-1; R-2 SERVED) THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION1731) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:24.09.2011 PASSED BY THE M.V.C.No.5467/2010 ON THE FILE OF XXII

Lakshminarayanappa @ Moogappa Vs. M/s Royal Sundaram Allianz Ins Co Lt ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

2nd Method of determining compensation - 58 by applying the criteria for compensation awarded for accidents under the Railways Act, 1989. 11.1 Table 2 - lumpsum compensation 60 determined per the Railways Act by compounding the inflation rates.12. The … their children under 4 K. Kumar v. Smt. Leena & Anr., AIR2010Kar 75. 5 Chandi Samuval v. Saimon Samual, MAT.APPEAL No.782 of 2022.-. 21 - … …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. C.R.RAVISHANKAR., FOR SRI. K.SURYANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R-1; R-2 SERVED) THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION1731) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:24.09.2011 PASSED BY THE M.V.C.No.5467/2010 ON THE FILE OF XXII

Employees State Insurance Corporation Vs. Smt. Sushila Mathur and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Insurance

Reported in : 1991WLN(UC)413

that they were entitled to find out as to whether the claimant had received any benefits from the railways and the appellant had not withdrawn the amount rather the applicant here self delayed the submission of information … behalf as well as on behalf of her minor son Ajay and daughter Seema, filed an application Under Section 75 of the Act, for obtaining dependant's benefit on account of death of her husband S.P. Mathur and damages

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Ashok Shankar Sarkale and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 13 and 15; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 124A; Consumer Protection Act, 1986; ;Motor Vehicles Act; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : IV(2006)ACC788; 2007ACJ1017; AIR2006Bom198; 2006(4)ALLMR250; 2006(3)BomCR593; 2006(4)MhLj404

referred to in Sub-sections (1) and (1-A) of Section 13 of the Claims Act.8. Section 124-A of the Railways Act, 1989 ('the Act' for short) provides compensation on account of untoward incident. The words 'untoward incident' are defined in

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Property

State Government to exercise its power under the Assam Act, he urged. Referring to Section 13 of the Railways Act 1989, Mr. Choudhury, argued that the land being vested in the State Government, as is evidenced by the revenue … Government of Assam by the Deputy Commissioner, Kamrup, by his communication dated 6.7.2006. By his letter No. GDD 75/98/85, dated 24.7.2006, the Secretary to the Government Of Assam, Guwahati Development Department, conveyed to the General Manager, N.F.

The Madras and Southern Mahratta Railway Co., Ltd., Madras Vs. Bhimapp ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Limitation

Reported in : 17Ind.Cas.419; (1912)23MLJ511

few of the articles are apparently trinkets but their value is not more than one hundred Rupees. Therefore Section 75 of the Railways Act does not apply. Lastly it is contended that there is no reliable evidence of … notice of the plaintiffs' claim for compensation was given within the period of six months allowed by the Railways Act. It is conceded that notice of such claim was given to the Traffic Manager. But it is contended

Union Of India Vs. M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

ANALYSIS .............................................................................................. 22 i. Relevant Statutory Scheme and Provisions .............................................. 22 ii. Scope of Section 106 of the Railways Act, 1989 ........................................ 29 a. What is meant by an “Overcharge”?. ....................................................... 35 b. Concept of an ‘Overcharge’ and an … appeal of FAO No.843 of 2014, and thereafter by a batch of common orders disposed of the other 75 appeals in terms of its findings recorded in the final judgement and order passed in the lead appeal.17.

Union of India (Uoi), South Central Railways Vs. Kurukundu Balakrishna ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 123(1), 123(2) and 124A; Constitution of India - Article 141; Evidence Act, 1872

Reported in : II(2004)ACC591; 2004ACJ529; 2004(1)ALD449; 2004(1)ALT100

was either injured or had died, was entitled to compensation from the Railways under Section 124-A of the Railways Act, 1989, (the Act) is the question that in substance arises for consideration in this reference. Incidentally whether wrongful, careless, … rail and road traffic at the level crossing. On facts in Lloyds Bank case it was found that 75 to 100 vehicles crossed the level crossing per day and it was held that the Railway company could

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Rajkot Municipal Corporation

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Municipal Tax

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 285 and 285(1); Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 - Sections 127, 129, 130, 131 and 132; Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Rules - Rules 39, 40 and 45(1); ;Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 135, 135(1) and 135(4); Railways (Amendment) Act, 1989 - Sections 184(1) and 184(4)

Reported in : AIR2003Guj87; (2002)3GLR904

the property occupied by the railway is concerned, there was no notification issued under Section 184(1) of the Railways Act, 1989, which corresponded to Section 135(1) of the Act of 1890. According to the petitioner, there was also no … from the petitioner towards service charges in respect of the property in question. 4. Special Civil Application No. 7537 of 1998 has been filed by the Union of India in respect of the property occupied by the