Advanced Search Results

Pushpaben Jitendrakumar Shah and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 47, 63, 93, 101, 109 and 109(1); Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 47, 47(1), 66(1), 67, 67(1), 67(2), Rules 95, 96, 102, 114, 115, 115(b), 120, 121, 128, 129, 130, 131, 137, 138, 150 and 163

Reported in : II(2005)ACC185; 2005ACJ191; AIR2004Guj370; (2004)3GLR2206

was applicable in the instant case, since the accident occurred prior to the coming into force of the Railways Act, 1989), the railway administration was bound to fix and display the maximum number of passengers that may be carried … was purely contractual, by which the passenger is taken for travel for payment. It was submitted that, under Section 67(1) of the said Act, it was provided that fares shall be deemed to be accepted and tickets to

Union of India (Uoi), South Central Railways Vs. Kurukundu Balakrishna ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 123(1), 123(2) and 124A; Constitution of India - Article 141; Evidence Act, 1872

Reported in : II(2004)ACC591; 2004ACJ529; 2004(1)ALD449; 2004(1)ALT100

was either injured or had died, was entitled to compensation from the Railways under Section 124-A of the Railways Act, 1989, (the Act) is the question that in substance arises for consideration in this reference. Incidentally whether wrongful, careless, … travel in such carriage on condition that he subsequently pays the fare payable for the distance to be travelled.Section 67: Carriage of dangerous or offensive goods :--(1) No person shall take with him on a Railway, or require

Sr. Divisional Commercial Manager Vs. Intelligence Officer

Court : Kerala

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 3(1), 3(1A), 5, 27, 28, 29, 29(2), 29A, 29A(4), 30, 30(1), 30A, 30B, 30C, 30E, 31, 31A(2), 32, 45A, 45A(1) and 46; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 61, 62, 64, 65, 66, 67, 74, 75, 80, 93 and 97; Kerala General Sales Tax Rules, 1963 - Rules 37 and 58; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 5, Rule 27; Railways Rules

Reported in : 2006(1)KLT834; (2007)8VST434(Ker)

under the Sales Tax Act. Carriage of goods by railway is dealt with in Chapter IX of the Railways Act, 1989. Section 61 states that every railway administration shall maintain, at each station and at such other places where goods … statement relating to the description of the goods. They could restrict carriage of dangerous or offensive goods under Section 67 of the Act. However, it is not the duty of the Railways to examine as to whether goods

M/s. Goodearth Agro Chem Pvt. Ltd. and Another Vs. The Container Corpo ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Education

liable to pay penalty and other associated charges. He found that provisions of Sections 66 and 83 of Railways Act, 1989 enable Container Corporation to claim the same from M/s. Goodearth. He accordingly found penal charges payable at Rs.9,07,327.80. … the petitioners jointly and severally liable to pay penalty and other associated charges. He found that provisions of Sections 66 and 83 of Railways Act, 1989 enable Container Corporation to claim the same from M/s. Goodearth. He … the case of Rex vs. Basudeva, reported at AIR (37) 1950 FC 67, is also relied upon to show how the sale of adulterated food

T.S.T. Kaznavi Vs. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Rep. by Its Chairman,

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2(17), 2(28), 2(29), 2(32), 2(67), 2(72), 2(73), 2(77), 39(1), 67(2), 68, 164, 173, 174, 175, 185 and 185(2); Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 10, 16, 16(1) and 16(3); Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 2, 12 to 19 and 51; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 42 and 51; Consumer Protection Act, 1986; Atomic Energy Act, 1962; Railways Act, 1989; The Works of Licensees Rules, 2006; Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 188

Reported in : (2008)2MLJ703

the Act, which relates to the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 or the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 or the Railways Act, 1989. The provisions are also stated to be in addition to and not in derogation of other laws, under … Act.2. The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board has filed counter affidavit. According to the respondent Electricity Board, as per Sections 164 and 185(2)(a) of the Electricity Act, 2003, the Board has the power of the 'Telegraph Authority' under … counter affidavit of the Board. By virtue of the powers under Section 67(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003, the Government has framed Rules called, 'The

Union Of India Vs. M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

ANALYSIS .............................................................................................. 22 i. Relevant Statutory Scheme and Provisions .............................................. 22 ii. Scope of Section 106 of the Railways Act, 1989 ........................................ 29 a. What is meant by an “Overcharge”?. ....................................................... 35 b. Concept of an ‘Overcharge’ and an … an absurdity or manifest injustice from any adherence to it, the Civil Appeal No(s). 1891-1966 of 2024 Page 67 of 95 court can step in. A statute or a rule ordinarily should be most agreeable to convenience,

T.Bhuvaneswari Vs. District Collector Cum District Magistrate of Erode ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

with any other provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 or the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 or the Railways Act, 1989.174. Act to have overriding effect.--Save as otherwise provided in Section 173, the provisions of this Act shall … Electricity Act, 2003 which also provides that appropriate Government may vest powers of Telegraph Authority with the licensee. Section 67(1) of Electricity Act, 2003 inter alia provides that a licensee may lay down or place electric supply lines.

Calendula Realtors Private Limited Vs. Cesc Limited and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2(20), 2(22), 2(40), 2(61), 2(72), 39(1), 51, 67, 68, 68(3), 68(5), 69, 164 and 173 to 175; ;Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 4, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 16(1) and 17; ;Companies Act, 1956; ;Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Section 51; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 144; ;Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 - Section 3(1); ;West Bengal Works of Licensee Rules, 2006 - Rule 3 and 3(4)

with any other provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 or the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 or the Railways Act, 1989. 174. Act to have overriding effect.-Save as otherwise provided in Section 173, the provisions of this Act shall … deals with 'Works', comprising three sections. It includes 'Works of Licensees' and 'Provisions Relating to Overhead Lines'. While Section 67 contains provisions conferring power on a licensee to lay down or place electric supply lines, Sections 68 and

Suo Motu vs Union of India

Court : Kerala

cannot be accepted in the light of the decision in the case of P.A. Narayanan [(1998) 3 SCC 67]. That apart, under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989 the Railway Administration cannot escape the liability having … Railway is authorised to represent the 1st respondent Union of India, Ministry of Railways.4. Section 57 of the Railways Act, 1989 deals with themaximum number of passengers of each compartment. As per Section 57, subject to the approval of

Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 93

Reported in : 2006(89)DRJ349

to the respondent railway administration for transportation to the destination station, in terms of Section 93 of the Railways Act, 1989, it is the railway administration which would be responsible for the loss of the consignment. 9. The Tribunal … without internal valve rod. The appellant served a claim notice on the railways for an amount of Rs. 67,365/- being value of the contents of wagon. However, the respondent rejected its claim necessitating filing of a claim