Advanced Search Results

M/s. Goodearth Agro Chem Pvt. Ltd. and Another Vs. The Container Corpo ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Education

liable to pay penalty and other associated charges. He found that provisions of Sections 66 and 83 of Railways Act, 1989 enable Container Corporation to claim the same from M/s. Goodearth. He accordingly found penal charges payable at Rs.9,07,327.80. … operate automatically thereafter. Constitution of India - Article 14, Article 19(1)(g) - Railways Act, 1989 – Section 64, Section 66 and Section 83 - The Indian Railways (Permission for Operators to Move Container Trains on Indian Railways) Rules,

Union of India (Uoi) Owning Southern Railway Represented by Its Genera ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 64, 66 and 93; Railways (Extent of Monetary Liability and Presumption of Percentage Charge) Rules, 1990

Reported in : (2006)4MLJ906

the sender or his authorised agent, and must contain a declaration of the weight, description in accordance with Section 66 of the Railways Act, 1989 and destination (Station and Railway on which situated) of the goods consigned, and … above issues, it would be proper for this Court to refer to Sections 64 and 93 of the Railways Act, 1989 and they are as follows:Section 64 Forwarding Note1. Every person entrusting any goods to a railway administration for

Kumari Savitri Roy Vs. Union of India

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 66, 68, 82A and 82F(2); Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 123 and 124; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 2; Railway Accidents Compensation Rules, 1989; Railway Accidents Compensation Rules, 1950 - Rule 6

Reported in : I(1994)ACC418; 1994ACJ720; AIR1994All239

a passenger for the purposes of the liability of the Railways has been set at rest by the Railways Act 1989 wherein the explanation to S. 124 of the Railways Act 1989 corresponding to old Sec. 82-A of the … the judgment and order D/ - 27-8-1979 passed in Claims Case No. 66 of 1977 Km. Savitri Roy v. Railways Administration by Ad hoc Claims … to perform his duty was not a bona fide passenger and consequently the application was not maintainable under Section 82A of the Indian Railway Act. The Claims Commissioner came to the conclusion that late R.N. Roy was

Sr. Divisional Commercial Manager Vs. Intelligence Officer

Court : Kerala

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 3(1), 3(1A), 5, 27, 28, 29, 29(2), 29A, 29A(4), 30, 30(1), 30A, 30B, 30C, 30E, 31, 31A(2), 32, 45A, 45A(1) and 46; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 61, 62, 64, 65, 66, 67, 74, 75, 80, 93 and 97; Kerala General Sales Tax Rules, 1963 - Rules 37 and 58; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 5, Rule 27; Railways Rules

Reported in : 2006(1)KLT834; (2007)8VST434(Ker)

under the Sales Tax Act. Carriage of goods by railway is dealt with in Chapter IX of the Railways Act, 1989. Section 61 states that every railway administration shall maintain, at each station and at such other places where goods … Railway receipt shall be the prima facie evidence of the weight and the number of packages stated therein. Section 66 empowers the officer to require statement relating to the description of goods. Section 74 states that the property

Pushpaben Jitendrakumar Shah and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 47, 63, 93, 101, 109 and 109(1); Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 47, 47(1), 66(1), 67, 67(1), 67(2), Rules 95, 96, 102, 114, 115, 115(b), 120, 121, 128, 129, 130, 131, 137, 138, 150 and 163

Reported in : II(2005)ACC185; 2005ACJ191; AIR2004Guj370; (2004)3GLR2206

was applicable in the instant case, since the accident occurred prior to the coming into force of the Railways Act, 1989), the railway administration was bound to fix and display the maximum number of passengers that may be carried … chaos and passengers were 'fighting their best to get into the train'. The passengers were sitting on joining sections between the two compartments and some were sitting even on outer part of the windows of the compartments … liability founded on tort. On purchase of the ticket, as per Section 66(1) of the Act, the passenger enters into a contract with the railway

Selvi Travels and Etc. Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Passports Act, 1967 - Sections 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12 and 24; Constitution of India - Articles 4, 14 and 32; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Indian Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 47 and 66

Reported in : AIR1993Mad216

32 of Constitution of India, Section 115 of Evidence Act, 1872 and Sections 47 and 66 of Indian Railways Act, 1989 - petition for quashing Circular dated 24.07.192 - in present case licence had been issued by Government to

Syed Muneer Raza Vs. Chairman, Railway Board, New Delhi and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ContractConstitution

Acts : Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 13(1), 56, 59, 65, 72, 73, 78 and 142; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 21 and 226; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 78, 79 and 105; IRCA - Rule 117; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Air Force Act, 1950; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 354; Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 78-B

Reported in : 2000(1)ALD689

Matched in: Advocate Mr. P. Radha Krishna, Adv. Mr. D. Srinivas, SC for Railways

Union of India (Uoi), South Central Railways Vs. Kurukundu Balakrishna ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 123(1), 123(2) and 124A; Constitution of India - Article 141; Evidence Act, 1872

Reported in : II(2004)ACC591; 2004ACJ529; 2004(1)ALD449; 2004(1)ALT100

was either injured or had died, was entitled to compensation from the Railways under Section 124-A of the Railways Act, 1989, (the Act) is the question that in substance arises for consideration in this reference. Incidentally whether wrongful, careless,

Union of India (Uoi), Secunderabad Vs. B. Koddekar and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 18, 23, 123(C) and 124(A); Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 2, 123 and 124A; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities Prevention Act, 1987 - Sections 3(1); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 123 and 124; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 140

Reported in : 2003ACJ1286; AIR2003AP23; 2002(4)ALT310

persons could be held to be an untoward incident falling within the ambit of Section 123(c) of the Railways Act, 1989 ? 2) Whether the applicants-respondents in these appeals are entitled for compensation under Section 124A of the Railways … we accordingly dismiss the same with costs.54. This appeal is filed assailing the order made in OAA No. 66 of 1998 dated 10-9-1999 by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Secunderabad.55. Appellants, six in all, residents of Budigadda Basthi,

Union of India versus M/S Kamakhya Transport Pvt. Ltd. Etc. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

Reported in : [2025]7S.C.R.346

held that the Railway authorities could not have raised the demand notice after the delivery of goods. Headnotes† Railways Act, 1989 - s.66 - Power to require statement relating to the description of goods - Appellant raised demand notices … were found to be different, from what had been declared, and, consequently, the appellant imposed a penalty under Section 66 of the Act. 10. Furthermore, the High Court’s reliance on Jagjit Cotton Textile (supra), is erroneous, since the