Advanced Search Results

Sr. Divisional Commercial Manager Vs. Intelligence Officer

Court : Kerala

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 3(1), 3(1A), 5, 27, 28, 29, 29(2), 29A, 29A(4), 30, 30(1), 30A, 30B, 30C, 30E, 31, 31A(2), 32, 45A, 45A(1) and 46; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 61, 62, 64, 65, 66, 67, 74, 75, 80, 93 and 97; Kerala General Sales Tax Rules, 1963 - Rules 37 and 58; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 5, Rule 27; Railways Rules

Reported in : 2006(1)KLT834; (2007)8VST434(Ker)

under the Sales Tax Act. Carriage of goods by railway is dealt with in Chapter IX of the Railways Act, 1989. Section 61 states that every railway administration shall maintain, at each station and at such other places where goods … under Section 32 of the Act is bound to file returns in Form No. 45 prescribed under Rule 58 of the KGST Rules. However, the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes shall permit the Railways to file centralised returns

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Nilkanth Tulsidas Bhatia and 7 ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 113, 114, 115, 119, 122, 141, 150 and 153; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 147, 148, 149, 153A, 164, 302, 307 and 436; Prevention of Terrorists Act, 2002 - Sections 32; Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 3(4), 5(2), 5(5) and 11; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 100; The Madras Agriculturists Relief Act, 1938; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881; Parent Act - Sections 119; Criminal Law; Constitution of India - Articles 73 and 226; Statutory Investigation into Railway Accidents Rules, 1998 - Rules 2(6) and 4

Reported in : (2006)2GLR952

read with Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 141, 150 and 153 of the Indian Railways Act, 1989. Later on, the provisions of the Prevention of Terrorists Act, 2002 were also invoked and after filing of … being disposed of by this judgment.F A C T S2. On 27.2.2002, an unfortunate incident took place when 58 passengers lost their lives on account of the fire caused in the S-6 coach of Sabarmati Express near

Suo Motu vs Union of India

Court : Kerala

Railway is authorised to represent the 1st respondent Union of India, Ministry of Railways.4. Section 57 of the Railways Act, 1989 deals with themaximum number of passengers of each compartment. As per Section 57, subject to the approval of … in one or more of the regional languages commonly in use in the areas served by the railway. Section 58 of the Act deals with earmarking of compartments, etc., exclusively for ladies. As per Section 58, every railway

Sh. Raj Kumar vs Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

not on account of an “untoward incident” within the meaning as defined under section 123 (c) of the Railways Act, 1989. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant has contended that the Tribunal has erred in holding that the appellant

Union of India (Uoi), Secunderabad Vs. B. Koddekar and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 18, 23, 123(C) and 124(A); Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 2, 123 and 124A; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities Prevention Act, 1987 - Sections 3(1); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 123 and 124; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 140

Reported in : 2003ACJ1286; AIR2003AP23; 2002(4)ALT310

persons could be held to be an untoward incident falling within the ambit of Section 123(c) of the Railways Act, 1989 ? 2) Whether the applicants-respondents in these appeals are entitled for compensation under Section 124A of the Railways … fide passenger? 3) Whether the accidental fall as alleged is not an untoward incident? 4) To what relief? 58. On behalf of the appellants-applicants, the wife of the deceased G. Rajamma, who is the 1st appellant, was

M/s. Sri Ragavendra Ad Lab Rep. by Its Proprietor and Others Vs. the S ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : 2013(1)CWC87; 2013WLR66

the Railway premises, the petitioners cannot be asked to take licence in view of Section 185 of the Railways Act, 1989. He also relied on Article 285 of the Constitution of India in this regard. He has relied on … of Chapter XII-A of the Chennai City Municipal Corporation Act, 1919 that was incorporated by way of Act 58 of 1991 and Act 26 of 2000 was upheld by a Division Bench of this Court in THE

Jayaswals Neco Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Railway Claims Tribunal Act; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 83 and 84

Reported in : 114(2004)DLT178

the present writ petition challenging the same as arbitrary, unreasonable and contrary to the provisions of the Indian Railways Act, 1989. The petitioner's case primarily is that the consignments in question having been transported after permission had been obtained … from it, failing which the railways threatened to exercise its lien over the petitioner's goods in terms of Section 83 and 84 of the Indian Railways Act. Aggrieved by the said demands, the petitioner company has filed … 11th September, 1998 requesting respondent No. 6 to arrange the supply of 58 N-boxes two point rake with train load facility to transport 29 boxes

Bharat Bhari Udyog Nigam Ltd. Vs. Jessop and Co. Ltd. Staff Associatio ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 - Section 18A; ;Railways Act, 1989; ;Companies Act - Section 256(4); ;Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 16, 226 and 311

Reported in : (2003)4CompLJ333(Cal)

rolling stock'19. He has also invited our attention to the definition given in Clause 2 (20) of the Railways Act, 1989, which reads as under :'2(20). 'Government railway' means a railway owned by the Central Government.'20. He has also … (JCL) was established in 1788 and the Government of India took over the management of this company under Section 18A of the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as Act of 1951), initially, for

Chandrasekharan Vs. Union of India

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 2012(3)KLJ864; 2012(3)KLT897

ThottathilB.Radhakrishnan, J. C.R. 1. The appellant was injured on 16.9.1995, in an untoward incident as defined in the Railways Act, 1989. Though the Tribunal noted that as per the entries at items 5 and 9 in Part III of … on the premise that the applicant had claimed only such amount in his application for compensation filed under section 16 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987, for short, the "Tribunal Act". He challenges the quantum. 2.

Rajeev Suri Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

v. Jalgaon 158 AIR1967SC295(para 10, 27, 60 and64) 159 (1969) 1 SCC325(paras 7 to 9, 11 and13) 160 1989 (2) Supp. SCC201(paras 8, 9 and13) 161 (2002) 3 SCC496(para10) 162 AIR1961SC1519163 AIR1991SC1216(paras 6 to10) 164 (supra at … assail the EC and they are not being repeated. 57 (supra at32) 58 (2011) 7 SCC33859 (supra at32) 49 Referring to Clause 7 of 2006 … Parliament commensurate with modern safety norms; and (xiv) To preserve the built heritage by not undertaking aggressive reconstruction activity on graded heritage structures on which only minimum renovation measures are permissible in law.9. Before we begin the … 229 d) Procedure during decision- 230-265 making process and Public Hearing under Section 11A e) Quasi Legislative Function 266-273 f) Post change in land use