Advanced Search Results

Prasada Rao (J.V.) Vs. South Eastern Railway, Waltair (by Dist. Traffi ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226, 311 and 311(2); Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 57

Reported in : (1959)ILLJ551AP

100. Service - removal - Article 226, 311, 311 (2) of Constitution of India and Sections 57 of Railways Act, 1989 - show cause notice issued for decaderisation of employee - second notice issued ordering removal from service - … Advocate's fee Rs. 100. Service - removal - Article 226, 311, 311 (2) of Constitution of India and Sections 57 of Railways Act, 1989 - show cause notice issued for decaderisation of employee - second notice issued

Suo Motu vs Union of India

Court : Kerala

Railway is authorised to represent the 1st respondent Union of India, Ministry of Railways.4. Section 57 of the Railways Act, 1989 deals with themaximum number of passengers of each compartment. As per Section 57, subject to the approval of

Union Of India Vs. M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

ANALYSIS .............................................................................................. 22 i. Relevant Statutory Scheme and Provisions .............................................. 22 ii. Scope of Section 106 of the Railways Act, 1989 ........................................ 29 a. What is meant by an “Overcharge”?. ....................................................... 35 b. Concept of an ‘Overcharge’ and an … charges can be said to be in excess of what was Civil Appeal No(s). 1891-1966 of 2024 Page 57 of 95 required (i.e., in excess of Nil loading charges as no loading was involved), this would not

Union of India versus M/S Kamakhya Transport Pvt. Ltd. Etc. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

Reported in : [2025]7S.C.R.346

held that the Railway authorities could not have raised the demand notice after the delivery of goods. Headnotes† Railways Act, 1989 - s.66 - Power to require statement relating to the description of goods - Appellant raised demand notices … 20.12.2021 passed by the Gauhati High Court in MFA Nos. 80 and 57 of 2016 and MFA Nos. 29 and 28 of 2017 Appearances for … either before or after delivery - Thus, the legislative intent is to permit levy of charge under this Section, at either stage and not at a specific one - High Court erred in holding that penal charges

Union of India (Uoi), Secunderabad Vs. B. Koddekar and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 18, 23, 123(C) and 124(A); Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 2, 123 and 124A; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities Prevention Act, 1987 - Sections 3(1); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 123 and 124; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 140

Reported in : 2003ACJ1286; AIR2003AP23; 2002(4)ALT310

persons could be held to be an untoward incident falling within the ambit of Section 123(c) of the Railways Act, 1989 ? 2) Whether the applicants-respondents in these appeals are entitled for compensation under Section 124A of the Railways … place. The Tribunal also found that the inquest report mentions about the recovery of a ticket bearing No. 57351 from the body of the deceased from Guntur to Mangalagiri.The ticket was kept along with other items in

Adhunik Metaliks Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (2009)156PLR395

been shown by the respondents. By making reference to the provisions of Sections 65 and 79 of the Railways Act, 1989 (in short the Act), counsel for the petitioner argued that in case of dispute, regarding weight, the petitioner … will not increase en-route, as has been shown by the respondents. By making reference to the provisions of Sections 65 and 79 of the Railways Act, 1989 (in short the Act), counsel for the petitioner argued that … steel. It booked a consignment with Indian Railways for transportation of (total 57 Wagons) iron and steel in the form of MS (Billets and Blooms)

Union of India (Uoi) Rep. by General Manager South Eastern Railway Vs. ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 78B and 82A; Railways Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 13, 13(1), 17 and 17(1)

Reported in : II(2005)ACC520; AIR2005AP184; 2005(2)ALD525; 2005(2)ALT127

shall also exercise, on and from the date of commencement of the provisions of Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989 (24 of 1989), all such jurisdiction, powers and authority as were exercisable immediately before that date by any … may refer to a few of the decisions. They are : Shamsul Huq v. Secretary of State, ILR 57 Cal 1286: (AIR 1930 Cal 332); Mahadeva Ayyar v. S.I. Rly. Co., ILR 45 Mad. 135 : (AIR

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Property

State Government to exercise its power under the Assam Act, he urged. Referring to Section 13 of the Railways Act 1989, Mr. Choudhury, argued that the land being vested in the State Government, as is evidenced by the revenue … C and that therefrom, plot A and C were available for lease to GMDA, at the rate of 57.93 lakh per bigha. The estimated amount for upfront payment was quoted to be Rs. 4.49 Crores. The impugned

Smt. Nirupama Sethi Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Orissa

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 18; Railway Claims Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1989 - Rule 21

Reported in : 2004ACJ1212; AIR2003Ori10

by the impugned order dated 21-5-2001,the Railway Claims Tribunal, Bhubaneswar Bench held that while Section 124-A of the Railways Act, 1989 was applicable to the case, no compensation was payable under the said section by the railway administration if … is an appeal against the order dated 21-5-2001 of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Bhubaneswar Bench in O.A. No. 57 of 2000 filed under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987.2. The appellant filed an application

Sh. Mohd Rahees vs Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

in a train. The claim petition was filed invoking the provisions of Sections 123(c) and 124-A of the Railways Act, 1989.3. It was the case of the claimant before the Tribunal that on 17.11.2018,he had purchased a valid mail/express … 124-A of the Railways Act. The Tribunal was, therefore, not(2019) 3 SCC 572 2021 SCC OnLine Bom 88 19:40:57 FAO 261/2022 Page 5 of 8 … accordingly. CM APPL. 26822/20241. By way of the present application filed under Order XXII Rule 9 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 the applicants seek setting aside of the abatement of the