Advanced Search Results

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. B. Jayaram and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 50 and 51(2); Indian Railway Conference Association Rules; Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 226

Reported in : 2009(4)KarLJ33; 2009(4)AIRKarR180; AIR2009Kar2442(D.B)

Administration for State under Article 12 of the Constitution;(c) In terms of Sections 50 and 51(2) of the Railways Act, 1989 permit the First Class Season Ticket holders (Upper Class Tickets) to travel by 2nd AC Chair Car (Lower … and IRCA is neither the Railway Administration for State under Article 12 of the Constitution;(c) In terms of Sections 50 and 51(2) of the Railways Act, 1989 permit the First Class Season Ticket holders (Upper Class Tickets)

Union of India (Uoi), Secunderabad Vs. B. Koddekar and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 18, 23, 123(C) and 124(A); Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 2, 123 and 124A; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities Prevention Act, 1987 - Sections 3(1); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 123 and 124; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 140

Reported in : 2003ACJ1286; AIR2003AP23; 2002(4)ALT310

persons could be held to be an untoward incident falling within the ambit of Section 123(c) of the Railways Act, 1989 ? 2) Whether the applicants-respondents in these appeals are entitled for compensation under Section 124A of the Railways … claimants were not entitled for any compensation as they failed to discharge the burden in this regard. ' 50. The facts in the said case are that on account of the death of Sheo Ram Singh, who

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Roop Narayan and Etc.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 64 and 65; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 17 and 114

Reported in : 1999ACJ413; AIR1997Raj123

to be paid since the claims had fallen within the exception Clause (f) of Section 93 of the Railways Act 1989 as it was owing to the omission or negligence on the part of the consignor that the goods … were made. All these facts were conclusively proved by the affidavits of Shri R. K. Berwa and Shri L. Nageshwar Rao. 4. Second limb of arguments of Mr. Rafiq the learned counsel is that the Tribunal failed

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Roop Narayan and 19 ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 1997(2)WLC455; 1997(1)WLN339

to be paid since the claims had fallen within the exception Clause (f) of Section 93 of the Railways Act, 1989 as it was owing to the omission or negligence on the were of the consignor that the goods … Books were made. All these facts were conclusively proved by the affidavits of Shri R.K. Berwa and Shri L. Nageshwar Rao'.4. Second limb of arguments of Mr. Rafiq, the learned Counsel is that the Tribunal failed to

Union of India Vs. Chairman, U.P.S.E.B. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 11 (a), (g); Electricity Supply Act, 1948 - Section 43A, 15A, 2(3A), 173, 26A (1); Consumer Protection Act, 1986 ; Electricity Act, 1910 - Section 27D, 9; Electricity Act, 2003 - Section 10 (2)

was very much within the jurisdiction of the Railways, inasmuch as Sections 11 (a) and (g) of the Railways Act, 1989 empower them to carry out such activity and all such necessary works for the purposes of constructing or … maintain or repair any electric traction equipment was very much within the jurisdiction of the Railways, inasmuch as Sections 11 (a) and (g) of the Railways Act, 1989 empower them to carry out such activity and all

Divisional Railway Manager/Commercial, Southern Railway (Thycord) and ...

Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh

Subject : Right to Information

the case on merit and referred to the relevant provisions of Section 51(1) and Section 61 of the Railways Act, 1989 and held, inter alia, as under: “.....The O.Ps. have tried to rely on the rules framed under Section … defence plea about the special coach accommodated only VVIPs/VIPs was not correct as in the additional coach having 50 berths, the kith and kin of the railway staff were also accommodated besides other passengers outside waiting list

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Trilochan Nayak and ors. Etc.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR2009Ori91

or in the Railways Claims Tribunal Act?5. For better appreciation, Sections 2(29), 123, 124 and 124-A of the Railways Act, 1989 and the scope and powers of the Railway Claims Tribunal under the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 are … law and facts involve in these appeals, they are being disposed of by this common judgment.These appeals under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') have been preferred by … further directed that out of the awarded amount a sum of Rs. 50,000/- with interest,and cost shall be paid to claimant No. 1 and out

Smt. Ramwati Vs. Sh. YamIn and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 140 and 173; Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 1994; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 124, 124A, 128 and 129; Railway (Amendment) Act, 1994; Workmens Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 4A; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939; Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 1969; Railway Accidents (Compensation) Rules, 1990; Railway Accidents and untoward Incidents (Compensation) Rules, 1999

Reported in : II(2006)ACC704; 2007ACJ1221; 129(2006)DLT590; 2006(89)DRJ352

India : [2001]2SCR365 , the Supreme Court examined the question of compensation payable under the provisions of the Railways Act, 1989 with reference to Section 124A that was introduced by Railway (Amendment) Act, 28 of 1994 for awarding of … and submitted that minimum compensation in case of no fault liability was enhanced from Rs. 25,000/- to Rs. 50,000/- with effect from 14th November, 1994. It was submitted that the appellant was entitled to benefit of this

Divisional Engineer, Telecommunications, Palasa, Srikakulam Vs. I. San ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1925 - Sections 2(1and 2) and 30; Railway Act, 1989 - Sections 2

Reported in : I(1999)ACC602; 1998(6)ALT171; [1999(82)FLR25]; (1999)IILLJ1316AP

workman - Sections 2 (1), 2 (2) and 30 of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1925 and Section 2 of Railways Act, 1989 - Commissioner for Workmen Compensation after recording evidence awarded compensation to respondent-driver for injuries received in course of

M.P.George vs Union of India

Court : Kerala

that he sustained injuries as a result of 'untoward incident' as defined under Section 123 (c) of the Railways Act, 1989.3. The Tribunal found that the appellant was not involved in an untowardincident and accordingly the Tribunal dismissed the