Advanced Search Results

Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. and ors. Etc. Etc. Vs. Mr. Avinash D. Kambl ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 7, 21(2), 27 and 42; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 2; Contract Act - Sections 23; Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 - Sections 3(18), 35, 35(5), 40 and 78; Bombay Electricity (Special Powers) Act, 1946; Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act; Constitution of India - Article 14, 16, 21, 39, 112(3) and 202(3); Bombay Sales Tax Act - Sections 33(6) and 35

Reported in : 2008(3)ALLMR1; 2008(2)BomCR497; (2008)110BOMLR805; 2008(4)MhLj125; 1996(72)FLR166

a reserved judgment of even Russell, L.J. As if it were an act of Parliament; And in British Railways Board v. Herrington Lord Morris said (All ER p. 761c) There is always peril in treating the words … Nath Shukla v. Vice Chancellor reported at 1987 LIC 1607 , Dilip Shirke v. Z.P. Yeotmal reported at 1989 Mh.L.J. 794, M.P. Bank Karmachari Sangh v. Syndicate Bank reported at 1996 LIC 1161 , on which Shri … 9 of Schedule IV by establishing contravention of Clauses 4C, 4D and 4E of Model Standing Orders applicable to the Industry under the Bombay Industrial … that the claims were not tenable as hit by Sub-section (2) of Section 21 of MRTU & PULP Act. The learned Member directed the employer

Chaganlal S/O Girdhari Kundkar Vs. Parmatma Ek Sewak Nagrik Sahakari B ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Unfair Labour Practices Act; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 2 and 25H; Bombay Industrial Relations Act; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16; Model Standing Orders

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR3117; 2009(6)MhLj463

Section 25-H of the Industrial Disputes Act as also Clauses 4D and 4E of the Model Standing Orders applicable to the respondent, it was necessary … Items 9 and 10 of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Unfair Labour Practices Act by the learned Member, Industrial Court, Nagpur, by his impugned order dated 25-11-1998.2. Facts, which are material for … by the respondent on 9-10-1991 without offering to him an opportunity of re-employment, thus breaching the provisions of Section 25-H of the Industrial Disputes Act as also the Model Standing Orders framed under the Bombay Industrial Relations

Eastern Coils Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1990)LC68Tri(Delhi)

within the knowledge of the revenue authorities since 1984 and the repair work was taken from the Indian Railways and another company Rotomac Electricals Pvt. Ltd. and the applicants were carrying on the repair work on their … appeal was presented in the Registry on the 4th day of July, 1989. Simultaneously a stay application duly supported with an affidavit sworn before a … Marketability, therefore, is an essential ingredient in order to be dutiable under the Schedule to Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985... the crude PVC films as produced by the appellant in this case were not known in the … that view of the matter and in view of the requirements of Section 11A of the Act, the claim had to be limited for a