Advanced Search Results
Shree Dayal Enterprise Vs. Commercial Tax Officer,
Sales Tax Tribunal STT West Bengal
May-31-1989
MRTP
(1990)79STC137Tribunal
end, while the applicant insisted on measurement in accordance with the alleged trade practice and procedures followed by railways and the ISI. Finally, the Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes had to intervene and according to his instructions … Mill from Vishakhapatnam by rail for delivery at Ultadanga. On January 13, 1989, the applicant produced the said two permits before the Inspector of Commercial … at Ultadanga so that the excess timber not covered by the permits was not transported in violation of Section 4B of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941. Sale value at the prevailing market rate of the aforesaid
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAll India Sc/St Association and Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Mumbai
Feb-27-2006
Land Acquisition
(2008)(1)SLJ184CAT
declared as illegal, have been made a party respondent.8. The learned Counsel for the respondents stated that the Railways are very much aware of the policy of reservation in favour of SC/ST and the Railway Board has … the respondents is not sustainable since it was issued in the year 1989 and thereafter a number of judgments of the Apex Court have come … the respondents to call only 5 General community candidates for selection to 1 Group 'B' post and their action of calling 11 persons for filling-up of 1 General post/ vacancy, may be declared as illegal and arbitrary. … as follows. The applicants No.2, 3 and 4 are working as Senior Section Engineers in Parel Workshop and applicant No. 2 belongs to ST community,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKalpanaben Chandan Chatarji Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Sep-17-1993
Criminal
1994(2)BomCR256; 1994CriLJ2000; 1994(1)MhLj140
Greater Bombay, Bombay, vide judgment and order dated 26th March 1991 in NDPS Special Case No. 916 of 1989. The relevant facts giving rise to the appeal are as follows. 2. On 31st August 1989, PSI Arun … of Art. 4 colly, were removed and repacked into Art. 4A and 4B by him. 8. The case of the prosecution is further strengthened by … narcotic drug, namely, heroin, under section 8(c) read with Section 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as 'the NDPS Act') and against sentence of 10 years rigorous imprisonment and a
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
The Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India and anr.
Delhi
May-29-1992
Civil
Cement Control Order, 1967
48(1992)DLT20; 1992(23)DRJ461
land, held in connection with the mineral bearing areas. This Section 12 was omitted by an Act of 1989 but with retrospective effect from 1st October, 1982. The result of this was that there was no provision … India v. Hindustan Aluminium Corporation, : AIR1983Cal307 considered the provision named clause 4B of the Aluminium Control Order, 1970, which was similar to clause 9 … distribution control by means, of orders issued under Sections 18G and 25 of the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 (for short the Idr Act) and also in terms of the Cement Control Order, 1967. It was
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBulbul Enterprise Vs. the Food Corporation of India and ors.
Guwahati
Mar-16-2000
Contract
Constitution of India - Article 226; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 83
: (AIR 1981 SC 1368); in Bareilly Development Authority, v. Ajai Pal Singh (1989) 2 SCC 116 (AIR 1989 SC 1076); and in Krishari Kumar, v. Union of India (1989) 2 SCC 504 : (AIR 1989 SC … to the Corporation or in particulars to any property or plant belonging to the Corporation due to any act whether negligence or otherwise of the Contractors themselves or other employees. The decision of the Sr. Regional Manager … true to the spirit of the terms of contract reproduced above. Mr. Section Deb, learned senior Counsel for the Corporation relying on the statements made
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPadmini. Vs. Easwari and ors.
Chennai
Jul-30-2012
Family
Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Section 15, 15(2)(1)(a); Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Section 63; Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 68, 69
the written statement that the plaintiff's mother got married before 1956 and the plaintiff has got married before 1989 and either in law or on facts, the plaintiff is not entitled over the schedule mentioned properties and … defendant viz. Lakshmanan and his deceased brother Raman. Under the provisions of Section 15 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, the plaintiff has got one fourth share and first and sixth defendants have got one fourth share
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskV.K. Kaliappa Gounder Sons Trading as Sun Beedi Traders Represented by ...
Chennai
Jan-07-1999
Intellectual Property Rights
(1999)2MLJ413
the two partners, namely, V.K. Arumugam and V.K. Sivaprakasam, after the death of V.K. Shanmugham in the year 1989 is a proof positive of the fact of illegality of the constitution of the present firm and the … the plaintiff is a Registered Partnership Firm, the registration No. of which is 452/89 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 carrying on business of manufacturing 'beedies. The plaintiff's father V.K. Kaliappa Gounder was the founder of the … the registered proprietor of the suit trade marks within the meaning of Section 28 of the Act and if anybody else uses the trade marks
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›