Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: railways act 1989 section 4b · Page 1 of about 7 results (0.044 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 31 1989

Shree Dayal Enterprise Vs. Commercial Tax Officer,

Court : Sales Tax Tribunal STT West Bengal

Decided on : May-31-1989

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (1990)79STC137Tribunal

end, while the applicant insisted on measurement in accordance with the alleged trade practice and procedures followed by railways and the ISI. Finally, the Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes had to intervene and according to his instructions … Mill from Vishakhapatnam by rail for delivery at Ultadanga. On January 13, 1989, the applicant produced the said two permits before the Inspector of Commercial … at Ultadanga so that the excess timber not covered by the permits was not transported in violation of Section 4B of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941. Sale value at the prevailing market rate of the aforesaid

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 27 2006

All India Sc/St Association and Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-27-2006

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2008)(1)SLJ184CAT

declared as illegal, have been made a party respondent.8. The learned Counsel for the respondents stated that the Railways are very much aware of the policy of reservation in favour of SC/ST and the Railway Board has … the respondents is not sustainable since it was issued in the year 1989 and thereafter a number of judgments of the Apex Court have come … the respondents to call only 5 General community candidates for selection to 1 Group 'B' post and their action of calling 11 persons for filling-up of 1 General post/ vacancy, may be declared as illegal and arbitrary. … as follows. The applicants No.2, 3 and 4 are working as Senior Section Engineers in Parel Workshop and applicant No. 2 belongs to ST community,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 17 1993

Kalpanaben Chandan Chatarji Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-17-1993

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1994(2)BomCR256; 1994CriLJ2000; 1994(1)MhLj140

Greater Bombay, Bombay, vide judgment and order dated 26th March 1991 in NDPS Special Case No. 916 of 1989. The relevant facts giving rise to the appeal are as follows. 2. On 31st August 1989, PSI Arun … of Art. 4 colly, were removed and repacked into Art. 4A and 4B by him. 8. The case of the prosecution is further strengthened by … narcotic drug, namely, heroin, under section 8(c) read with Section 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as 'the NDPS Act') and against sentence of 10 years rigorous imprisonment and a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 29 1992

The Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-29-1992

Subject : Civil

Acts : Cement Control Order, 1967

Reported in : 48(1992)DLT20; 1992(23)DRJ461

land, held in connection with the mineral bearing areas. This Section 12 was omitted by an Act of 1989 but with retrospective effect from 1st October, 1982. The result of this was that there was no provision … India v. Hindustan Aluminium Corporation, : AIR1983Cal307 considered the provision named clause 4B of the Aluminium Control Order, 1970, which was similar to clause 9 … distribution control by means, of orders issued under Sections 18G and 25 of the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 (for short the Idr Act) and also in terms of the Cement Control Order, 1967. It was

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 16 2000

Bulbul Enterprise Vs. the Food Corporation of India and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Mar-16-2000

Subject : Contract

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 83

: (AIR 1981 SC 1368); in Bareilly Development Authority, v. Ajai Pal Singh (1989) 2 SCC 116 (AIR 1989 SC 1076); and in Krishari Kumar, v. Union of India (1989) 2 SCC 504 : (AIR 1989 SC … to the Corporation or in particulars to any property or plant belonging to the Corporation due to any act whether negligence or otherwise of the Contractors themselves or other employees. The decision of the Sr. Regional Manager … true to the spirit of the terms of contract reproduced above. Mr. Section Deb, learned senior Counsel for the Corporation relying on the statements made

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 30 2012

Padmini. Vs. Easwari and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-30-2012

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Section 15, 15(2)(1)(a); Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Section 63; Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 68, 69

the written statement that the plaintiff's mother got married before 1956 and the plaintiff has got married before 1989 and either in law or on facts, the plaintiff is not entitled over the schedule mentioned properties and … defendant viz. Lakshmanan and his deceased brother Raman. Under the provisions of Section 15 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, the plaintiff has got one fourth share and first and sixth defendants have got one fourth share

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 07 1999

V.K. Kaliappa Gounder Sons Trading as Sun Beedi Traders Represented by ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-07-1999

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Reported in : (1999)2MLJ413

the two partners, namely, V.K. Arumugam and V.K. Sivaprakasam, after the death of V.K. Shanmugham in the year 1989 is a proof positive of the fact of illegality of the constitution of the present firm and the … the plaintiff is a Registered Partnership Firm, the registration No. of which is 452/89 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 carrying on business of manufacturing 'beedies. The plaintiff's father V.K. Kaliappa Gounder was the founder of the … the registered proprietor of the suit trade marks within the meaning of Section 28 of the Act and if anybody else uses the trade marks

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial