Advanced Search Results

Maulavi HusseIn Haji Abraham Umarji Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 - Sections 3(1), 3(2), 23, 34(1), 49(2) and 50; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860; ;Indian Railways Act, 1989; ;Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984; Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Sections 135; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 167 and 167(2)

Reported in : AIR2004SC3946; 2004(2)ALD(Cri)620; 2004CriLJ3860; (2005)1GLR585; JT2004(6)SC227; 2004(6)SCALE320; (2004)6SCC672; 2004(2)LC1484(SC)

alleged commission of offences punishable under various provisions of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'), Indian Railways Act, 1989 (in short the 'Railways Act') and the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 (in short the … Arijit Pasayat, J. 1. The scope and ambit of Section 49(2) of the Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 (in short the 'POTA') fall for consideration in this appeal.

The Sales Tax Practitioners' Association of Maharashtra and Tushar P. ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Sales Tax/VATConstitution

Acts : Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act - Sections 22, 22(1), 33, 61, 61(1), 82, 82(1) and 82(2); Societies Registration Act, 1960; Cost and Works Accountants Act, 1959; Chartered Accountants Act, 1949; Indian Railways Act, 1989; Road Transport Corporation Act, 1950; VAT Act, 2002; Companies Act - Sections 211, 226 and 226(2); Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 29, 33 and 49; Income Tax Act - Sections 44AB, 44AE, 44AF, 44BB, 44BBA, 288 and 288(2); Bombay Sales Tax Act - Sections 71; Maharashtra Distillation of Spirit and Manufacture of Potable Liquor Rules, 1966 - Rule 65; Maharashtra Manufacture of Beer and Wine Rules, 1966; Special Permits and Licence Rules, 1952; Bombay Foreign Liquor Rules, 1953; Maharashtra Country Liquor Rules, 1973; Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Rules, 1957 -

Reported in : 2008(5)BomCR396; [2008]14STT348; (2008)14VST69(Bom)

Union Government, any Department of any State Government, local authorities, the Railway Administration as defined under the Indian Railways Act, 1989, the Konkan Railway Corporation Limited and the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation constituted under the Road Transport Corporation … of the Advocates Act bars any other professional to practice in any court or before any authority etc. Section 49 of the Advocates Act gives general powers to the Bar Council of India to make such rules. Under

Union Of India Vs. M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

ANALYSIS .............................................................................................. 22 i. Relevant Statutory Scheme and Provisions .............................................. 22 ii. Scope of Section 106 of the Railways Act, 1989 ........................................ 29 a. What is meant by an “Overcharge”?. ....................................................... 35 b. Concept of an ‘Overcharge’ and an … on the case law, titled as Birla Cement Works v. G.M., Western Railways & Anr., 1995 SCC (2) 493. We have carefully perused the said case law and it supports the contention of the Respondent Railway. xxx

State of Kerala Represented by Its Chief Secretary vs Binu Sebastian

Court : Kerala

of India and Railway Board or their instrumentalities issue appropriate notification, as contemplated under the provisions of the Railways Act, 1989, for the ends of justice.6. The issues raised in the writ petitions are in relation toinstallation of survey … 2013, with the Central Government holding 51% share and State Government holding 49% share.11. In the counter affidavit filed by the appellant StateGovernment, the allegation … Kerala Survey and Boundaries Act, 1961, in order to undertake the Social Impact Assessment Study, as required under Section 4 of the LARR Act, 2013.4. Appellant in W.A No. 169/2022 is the 2 nd respondent in W.P.(C)

State of Kerala Represented by the Additional Chief Secretary to Gover ...

Court : Kerala

of India and Railway Board or their instrumentalities issue appropriate notification, as contemplated under the provisions of the Railways Act, 1989, for the ends of justice.6. The issues raised in the writ petitions are in relation toinstallation of survey … 2013, with the Central Government holding 51% share and State Government holding 49% share.11. In the counter affidavit filed by the appellant StateGovernment, the allegation … Kerala Survey and Boundaries Act, 1961, in order to undertake the Social Impact Assessment Study, as required under Section 4 of the LARR Act, 2013.4. Appellant in W.A No. 169/2022 is the 2 nd respondent in W.P.(C)

State of Kerala vs V.V Varma

Court : Kerala

of India and Railway Board or their instrumentalities issue appropriate notification, as contemplated under the provisions of the Railways Act, 1989, for the ends of justice.6. The issues raised in the writ petitions are in relation toinstallation of survey … 2013, with the Central Government holding 51% share and State Government holding 49% share.11. In the counter affidavit filed by the appellant StateGovernment, the allegation … Kerala Survey and Boundaries Act, 1961, in order to undertake the Social Impact Assessment Study, as required under Section 4 of the LARR Act, 2013.4. Appellant in W.A No. 169/2022 is the 2 nd respondent in W.P.(C)

State of Kerala Represented by Secretary to Government vs Sunil J Arac ...

Court : Kerala

of India and Railway Board or their instrumentalities issue appropriate notification, as contemplated under the provisions of the Railways Act, 1989, for the ends of justice.6. The issues raised in the writ petitions are in relation toinstallation of survey … 2013, with the Central Government holding 51% share and State Government holding 49% share.11. In the counter affidavit filed by the appellant StateGovernment, the allegation … Kerala Survey and Boundaries Act, 1961, in order to undertake the Social Impact Assessment Study, as required under Section 4 of the LARR Act, 2013.4. Appellant in W.A No. 169/2022 is the 2 nd respondent in W.P.(C)

Sudhir Kumar Srivastava Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through General Manag ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 2008(4)AWC3429

of India 2001 (2) TAC 250 and the purpose and object, with which the Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the Act for short) was introduced as per Railway (Amendment) Act, 28 of 1994,

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Property

State Government to exercise its power under the Assam Act, he urged. Referring to Section 13 of the Railways Act 1989, Mr. Choudhury, argued that the land being vested in the State Government, as is evidenced by the revenue

Apekshaben V. Shah Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1995)1GLR764

appropriate fares can be fixed by the Railways. The word 'fare' is defined in Section 2(14) of the Railways Act, 1989 so as to mean the charge levied for the carriage of passengers. Chapter VIII of the said Act … levied for the carriage of passengers. Chapter VIII of the said Act deals with carriage of passengers and Section 49 inter alia provides tables of fares to be exhibited. Section 50(1) of the Act provides that any person