Advanced Search Results

Sr. Divisional Commercial Manager Vs. Intelligence Officer

Court : Kerala

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 3(1), 3(1A), 5, 27, 28, 29, 29(2), 29A, 29A(4), 30, 30(1), 30A, 30B, 30C, 30E, 31, 31A(2), 32, 45A, 45A(1) and 46; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 61, 62, 64, 65, 66, 67, 74, 75, 80, 93 and 97; Kerala General Sales Tax Rules, 1963 - Rules 37 and 58; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 5, Rule 27; Railways Rules

Reported in : 2006(1)KLT834; (2007)8VST434(Ker)

under the Sales Tax Act. Carriage of goods by railway is dealt with in Chapter IX of the Railways Act, 1989. Section 61 states that every railway administration shall maintain, at each station and at such other places where goods … the Railways Act.2. Third petitioner in the Writ Petition was served with a notice dated 5.11.1998 under Section 46/45A of the Kerala General Salestax Act, 1963, for short 'the Sales Tax Act', by the Intelligence Officer, Squad

Lakshminarayanappa @ Moogappa Vs. M/s Royal Sundaram Allianz Ins Co Lt ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

2nd Method of determining compensation - 58 by applying the criteria for compensation awarded for accidents under the Railways Act, 1989. 11.1 Table 2 - lumpsum compensation 60 determined per the Railways Act by compounding the inflation rates.12. The … Samual, MAT.APPEAL No.782 of 2022.-. 21 - NC:2024. KHC:38401 MFA No.11440 of 2011 C/W MFA No.206 of 2018 Section 46. The maintenance contemplated under the 2007 Act includes a provision for food, clothing, residence and medical attendance, and

Ningesh Vs. Nanjegowda

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

2nd Method of determining compensation - 58 by applying the criteria for compensation awarded for accidents under the Railways Act, 1989. 11.1 Table 2 - lumpsum compensation 60 determined per the Railways Act by compounding the inflation rates.12. The … Samual, MAT.APPEAL No.782 of 2022.-. 21 - NC:2024. KHC:38401 MFA No.11440 of 2011 C/W MFA No.206 of 2018 Section 46. The maintenance contemplated under the 2007 Act includes a provision for food, clothing, residence and medical attendance, and

Bagadiya Brothers Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Land Acquisition

Central government under the Indian Railways Act, 1890. The Indian Railways Act, 1890 has been repealed by the Railways Act, 1989. Section 200 of the Railways Act, 1989 deals with repeal and saving. Section 200 of the Railways Act, 1989

Ramakrishna Steel Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 38, 83, 84 and 99; General Rules - Rule 152

Reported in : I(2001)ACC194

(d) and Clause (h) of Section 46-C'. 16. Section 99 is the corresponding provision under the present Indian Railways Act, 1989 and it is the same as Section 77 of the old Act, except for the omission of Sub-section

Nkgsb Cooperative Bank Limited Vs. Subir Chakravarty

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988; Section 93 (“by an officer or authority subordinate to the Central Government”) of the Railways Act, 1989; Section 6 (“such other officer subordinate to the Director General”) and Section 15 (“an officer subordinate to the Director … 15 (“an officer subordinate to the Director General”) of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992; Sections 46 and 328 (“an officer subordinate to him”) of the New Delhi Municipal Council Act, 1994; 20 16. The

Syed Muneer Raza Vs. Chairman, Railway Board, New Delhi and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ContractConstitution

Acts : Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 13(1), 56, 59, 65, 72, 73, 78 and 142; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 21 and 226; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 78, 79 and 105; IRCA - Rule 117; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Air Force Act, 1950; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 354; Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 78-B

Reported in : 2000(1)ALD689

Matched in: Advocate Mr. P. Radha Krishna, Adv. Mr. D. Srinivas, SC for Railways

Union of India (Uoi), South Central Railways Vs. Kurukundu Balakrishna ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 123(1), 123(2) and 124A; Constitution of India - Article 141; Evidence Act, 1872

Reported in : II(2004)ACC591; 2004ACJ529; 2004(1)ALD449; 2004(1)ALT100

was either injured or had died, was entitled to compensation from the Railways under Section 124-A of the Railways Act, 1989, (the Act) is the question that in substance arises for consideration in this reference. Incidentally whether wrongful, careless, … no assistance.20. In Director, Combat Vehicles and Research Establishment, Avadi v. Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Madras, 1995 LLR 460 it was held that an employee jumping from a running train to catch another train would not be

The Union of India Owning Southern Railway. Vs. the Addl. Registrar, R ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Section 123 (c)(2), 124-A, 2(29), 129; Code of Criminal Procedure(CrPC) - Section 174; Railway Rules 1990 - Rule 4, 124

accidental death, which is an 'untoward incident' as per Section 123 (c) (2) and Section 124-A of the Railways Act, 1989, respondents 2 and 3 as his dependents are entitled to the maximum compensation of Rs.4,00,000/-.7. According to Mr.T.S.Rajamohan,

Union of India (Uoi) Through General Manager Vs. Ashokbhai Govindbhai ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 123 and 127; Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 124(A); Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 3; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 140 and 163A; Public Liability Insurance Act, 1991; Interest Act, 1978 - Sections 3; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 34; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 9; Constitution of India - Article 38(1); Railway Accidents and Untoward Incidents (Compensation) Rules, 1990 - Rule 3

Reported in : (2009)3GLR1845

raised contention before this Court that claimant has not made out any case of amount under provisions of Railways Act, 1989. He also raised contention before this Court that incident is not covered as an untoward incident as defined … also raised contention before this Court that incident is not covered as an untoward incident as defined in Section 123(c)(2) of the Railways Act, 1989. Learned Advocate Mr. Shastri also submitted it was a negligence on part