Advanced Search Results
Sanjay Sampatrao Gaikwad Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Mumbai
Jun-16-2005
Civil
Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 24A, 123, 123C, 123C(1), 123(1), 124, 124A, 124(2), 124(3), 124(4), 125, 125(1) and 126; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3(1) and 3(2); Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 82; Indian Railways Rules - Rule 3; Railway Accident (Compensation) Rules, 1989
II(2006)ACC424; 2006ACJ656; AIR2005Bom409
incident within the meaning of the said expression under Section 24A read with Section 123(C ) of the Railways Act, 1989, hereinafter called as 'the said Act'. The Tribunal had also awarded interest at the rate of 9% from … in appeal before the Apex Court by the claimants. While allowing the appeal, compensation was enhanced to Rs. 4,00,000/- instead of Rs. 2,00,000/-. Apart from that, there was no interference in the order of the High Court
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRathi Menon Vs. Union of India
Supreme Court of India
Mar-13-2001
Motor Vehicles
Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 19, 123, 124A, 126 and 129; Railway (Amendment) Act, 1994; Railway Accident Compensation Rules 1990 - Rule 3 (1); Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 4
I(2001)ACC453; 2001ACJ721; AIR2001SC1333; JT2001(3)SC457; 2001(2)KLT12(SC); (2001)3MLJ1(SC); 2001(2)SCALE432; (2001)3SCC714; [2001]2SCR365; 2001(2)LC1053(SC)
her by the Claims Tribunal. 13. Appellant's claim for the compensation was based on Section 124A of the Railways Act 1989 (for short 'the Act'). The said Section itself was introduced as per Railway (Amendment) Act 28 of 1994. … Railways Act. In the former, compensation payable is fixed in the Act itself through the schedule incorporated thereto. Section 4 of the W.C. Act shows that such compensation is to be linked with the monthly wages of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of MaharashtrA. Vs. Kamal Ahmed Mohammed Vakil Ansari and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Mar-14-2013
Constitution
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - 302, 307, 326, 427, 436, 20A, 120B, 123, 124, 34; ndian Explosives Act; Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act; Indian Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 151, 152, 153, 154; Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 - Sections 10, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 40; Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 - Sections 3(1)(i), 3(2), 3(4); Passports Act, 1967 - Section 12(1)(c); Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 6, 11, 5 to 16, 26, 30, 30(b), 31
the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984, read with Sections 151, 152, 153, 154 of the Railways Act, 1989, read with Section 12(1)(c) of the Passports Act, 1967.3. The prosecution case (in Special Case No.21 of 2006) … the accused in the controversy. Initially the accused-respondents were charged with offences punishable under Sections 302, 307, 326, 427, 436, 20A, 120B, 123 and 124 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 read with Section 34 of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Jagjit Cotton Textile Mills Vs. Chief Commercial Superintendent N.R. a ...
Supreme Court of India
Apr-21-1998
Civil
Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 19 and 23(1); Employees Provident Fund etc. Act, 1952; Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 3(13), 16, 29(1), 47(4), 53(1),(2), 54(1), 72(1), 72(2) and 73; Railways (Amendment) Act, 1954; Indian Railways Conference Association - Rules 6, 29 and 161A; Constitution of India - Article 14; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 27, 55(1), 72, 73, 74, 83 and 87; Indian Railway Board Act, 1905 - Sections 2; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 - 23(1); Customs Act, 1962
1998IVAD(SC)185; AIR1998SC1959; JT1998(3)SC297; 1998(3)SCALE209; (1998)5SCC126; [1998]2SCR1065
verified and noted in the forwarding note and in the railway receipt. The Railways Act, 1890 and the Railways Act, 1989 contain provisions which require that the 'average carrying capacity' of each wagon be marked on the wagon. Section … Court and from Railway Claims Tribunal (Lucknow Bench). Counsel have referred to the documents contained in T.C. No. 47 of 1997 (Eastern coalfield Ltd. v. Ashoka Silicate & Glass Works, Delhi) for convenience, apart from the pleadings
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) Vs. Rajkot Municipal Corporation
Gujarat
Sep-19-2002
Municipal Tax
Constitution of India - Article 285 and 285(1); Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 - Sections 127, 129, 130, 131 and 132; Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Rules - Rules 39, 40 and 45(1); ;Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 135, 135(1) and 135(4); Railways (Amendment) Act, 1989 - Sections 184(1) and 184(4)
AIR2003Guj87; (2002)3GLR904
the property occupied by the railway is concerned, there was no notification issued under Section 184(1) of the Railways Act, 1989, which corresponded to Section 135(1) of the Act of 1890. According to the petitioner, there was also no … warrant was issued in respect thereof for recovery of the aforesaid dues. The order was made under Rule 45(1) of Chapter 8 of the Schedule to the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949. The impugned bill at
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDurgesh Coal and Others Vs. Northern Railway, New Delhi and Others
Allahabad
Mar-03-2000
Miscellaneous
Indian Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 2, 2(37), 27, 64, 65(2), 72(1), (2) and (4), 73, 78 and 79; Railways (Punitive Charges for Overloading of Wagon) Rules, 1990 - Rule 3; Indian Railways Conference Association Tariff Rules - Rule 702; Constitution of India - Article 226
2000(2)AWC1682
the production of railway receipts, etc. Civil - over loading - Sections 73, 78 and 79 of Indian Railways Act, 1989, Rule 3 of Railways (Punitive Charges for Overloading of Wagon) Rules, 1990 and Rule 702 of Indian Railways … the petitioners, could not demand penal freight amounting to Rs. 55 lacs as they have not complied with Section 73 of Indian Railways Act. Support has also been sought to be derived from a judgment dated 20.9.1994 … (Railways) to allow reweighment of the entire coal consignment in question of 41 wagons and not to realise penal freight from them in respect of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) Vs. Nilkanth Tulsidas Bhatia and 7 ors.
Gujarat
Mar-20-2006
Civil
Indian Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 113, 114, 115, 119, 122, 141, 150 and 153; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 147, 148, 149, 153A, 164, 302, 307 and 436; Prevention of Terrorists Act, 2002 - Sections 32; Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 3(4), 5(2), 5(5) and 11; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 100; The Madras Agriculturists Relief Act, 1938; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881; Parent Act - Sections 119; Criminal Law; Constitution of India - Articles 73 and 226; Statutory Investigation into Railway Accidents Rules, 1998 - Rules 2(6) and 4
(2006)2GLR952
read with Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 141, 150 and 153 of the Indian Railways Act, 1989. Later on, the provisions of the Prevention of Terrorists Act, 2002 were also invoked and after filing of … the fire caused in the S-6 coach of Sabarmati Express near the Godhra Railway Station and more than 40 passengers sustained injuries. Criminal complaints came to be filed being CR Nos. 9 and 10 of 2002 at
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhagaban Dey Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Kolkata
Apr-29-2009
Civil
Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 30, 33, 36, 37, 43, 48, 70, 72(2), 72(3), 72(4), 73, 78, 79, 82 and 83
AIR2010Cal13
Mr. Das, Counsel for the respondents, in view of the provisions of Sections 33 and 36 of the Railways Act, 1989, against the demands the petitioner's remedy, if any, is only before the Tribunal. He has relied on Jagit … the Tribunal has jurisdiction.4. According to Mr. Das, Counsel for the respondents, in view of the provisions of Sections 33 and 36 of the Railways Act, 1989, against the demands the petitioner's remedy, if any, is only
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAgarwala and Co. and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Kolkata
Dec-20-2006
Civil
Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 65, 65(2), 69, 72(4), 73 and 79; ;Constitution of India - Article 226
AIR2007Cal90
of paragraph 1744 of the Indian Railway Commercial Manual-II read with the provisions of Section 79 of the Railways Act, 1989, it was not permissible for the respondent authority to sit tight over the matter. Mr. Samanta further submits … consignment of the salt. On October 30, 1991 the petitioners submitted representation to the respondent Nos. 2 to 4 with request for re-weighment of the consignment and or the alleged excess eight salt, bags in their presence
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi), by Its General Manager, Sc Railway Vs. Alapati V ...
Andhra Pradesh
Apr-06-2004
Civil
Railway Act, 1989 - Sections 77, 106, 106(1) and 106(2); Railway Administration Act - Sections 106
2006ACJ1014; 2004(4)ALD493; 2004(5)ALT500
to costs. Civil - non compliance of provision - Sections 77, 106, 106 (1) and 106 (2) of Railways Act, 1989 and Section 106 of Railway Administration Act - claimant purchased teak logs and entrusted to railway administration - … of facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal directed the appellant herein to pay sum of Rs. 4,55,000/- to the respondent-applicant towards compensation with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »