Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: railways act 1989 section 33 · Page 1 of about 1,017 results (0.114 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 29 2009

Bhagaban Dey Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-29-2009

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 30, 33, 36, 37, 43, 48, 70, 72(2), 72(3), 72(4), 73, 78, 79, 82 and 83

Reported in : AIR2010Cal13

Mr. Das, Counsel for the respondents, in view of the provisions of Sections 33 and 36 of the Railways Act, 1989, against the demands the petitioner's remedy, if any, is only before the Tribunal. He has relied on Jagit … require recording of evidence by the tribunal.5. There is no dispute that in terms of the provisions of Section 33 of the Railways Act, 1989 the tribunal has been constituted, and that it was functioning at the date

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 16 2015

Project Engineer, Kerala Road Fund Board Vs. Thankappan and Others

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Oct-16-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

applicable to all lands except land, premises and trains owned and controlled by the Railways under the Railway Act, 1989, hence the land belonging to the National Highway is also included where the 2014 Act is applicable. Learned … authority or jurisdiction to direct removal/eviction of the bunk for construction of bus-bay? (ii). Whether by virtue of Section 33 of the 2014 Act, provisions of the 1999 Act shall be overridden and the State Highway Authority under

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 28 2008

The Sales Tax Practitioners' Association of Maharashtra and Tushar P. ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-28-2008

Subject : Sales Tax/VATConstitution

Acts : Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act - Sections 22, 22(1), 33, 61, 61(1), 82, 82(1) and 82(2); Societies Registration Act, 1960; Cost and Works Accountants Act, 1959; Chartered Accountants Act, 1949; Indian Railways Act, 1989; Road Transport Corporation Act, 1950; VAT Act, 2002; Companies Act - Sections 211, 226 and 226(2); Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 29, 33 and 49; Income Tax Act - Sections 44AB, 44AE, 44AF, 44BB, 44BBA, 288 and 288(2); Bombay Sales Tax Act - Sections 71; Maharashtra Distillation of Spirit and Manufacture of Potable Liquor Rules, 1966 - Rule 65; Maharashtra Manufacture of Beer and Wine Rules, 1966; Special Permits and Licence Rules, 1952; Bombay Foreign Liquor Rules, 1953; Maharashtra Country Liquor Rules, 1973; Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Rules, 1957 -

Reported in : 2008(5)BomCR396; [2008]14STT348; (2008)14VST69(Bom)

Union Government, any Department of any State Government, local authorities, the Railway Administration as defined under the Indian Railways Act, 1989, the Konkan Railway Corporation Limited and the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation constituted under the Road Transport Corporation … Act, 1961 provides that advocates would be the only class of persons to 'practice the profession of law'. Section 33 of the Advocates Act bars any other professional to practice in any court or before any authority etc.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 27 1993

Ratnakar Tanbaji Itankar Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-27-1993

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 3, 13, 17(2), 15, 33, 72, 73 and 74; Railways Acts, 1890 - Sections 80 and 82A; Railways Acts, 1989 - Sections 107, 109, 124 and 125; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5; Railway Claims Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1989

Reported in : 1994ACJ762; AIR1994Bom132; 1994(4)BomCR12

on the spot. The appellant thereafter filed the application before the Claims Tribunal under Section 109 of the Railways Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the 'new Railways Act) claiming compensation for the death of his wife Shakuntalabai whe … sub-clause (ii) of clause (a) of Section 13(1) of the Act should be read in the light of Section 33 of the Claims Tribunal Act or at any rate, it should be held that the said Section 80

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 27 2013

Jayakrishna Flour Mills Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Chairman of Railway Board

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-27-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

contention of the learned counsel for the respondents is that the learned Railway Rates Tribunal is constituted under Section 33 of the Railways Act, 1989 to discharge the functions under Chapter VII. Section 36 of the Railways Act, … Act, 1989, can only be filed if there is contravention of the provisions of Section 70 of the Railways Act, 1989. Section 70 of the Act prohibits undue preference.39. The railway administration is barred from giving unreasonable preference or advantage

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 12 2024

Lakshminarayanappa @ Moogappa Vs. M/s Royal Sundaram Allianz Ins Co Lt ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-12-2024

Subject : Land Acquisition

2nd Method of determining compensation - 58 by applying the criteria for compensation awarded for accidents under the Railways Act, 1989. 11.1 Table 2 - lumpsum compensation 60 determined per the Railways Act by compounding the inflation rates.12. The … (2014) 1 SCC244 11 Kajal v. Jagdish Chand, (2020) 4 SCC413 - 33 - NC:2024. KHC:38401 MFA No.11440 of 2011 C/W MFA No.206 of 2018 … …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. C.R.RAVISHANKAR., FOR SRI. K.SURYANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R-1; R-2 SERVED) THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION1731) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:24.09.2011 PASSED BY THE M.V.C.No.5467/2010 ON THE FILE OF XXII

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 12 2024

Ningesh Vs. Nanjegowda

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-12-2024

Subject : Land Acquisition

2nd Method of determining compensation - 58 by applying the criteria for compensation awarded for accidents under the Railways Act, 1989. 11.1 Table 2 - lumpsum compensation 60 determined per the Railways Act by compounding the inflation rates.12. The … (2014) 1 SCC244 11 Kajal v. Jagdish Chand, (2020) 4 SCC413 - 33 - NC:2024. KHC:38401 MFA No.11440 of 2011 C/W MFA No.206 of 2018 … …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. C.R.RAVISHANKAR., FOR SRI. K.SURYANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R-1; R-2 SERVED) THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION1731) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:24.09.2011 PASSED BY THE M.V.C.No.5467/2010 ON THE FILE OF XXII

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 27 2004

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Aruna Machine Tools Super B-iii

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-27-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 2(33), 65, 74, 106, 106(1) and 107; Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 3 and 13(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 19 and 20; Sale of Goods Act, 1930

Reported in : 2005(2)ALD356; 2005(2)ALT391

learned Tribunal came to the conclusion that the consignor issued a valid notice under Section 106 of the Railways Act, 1989 (the Act, for brevity), that the appellant herein is liable to pay the compensation for nondelivery of the … the decisions. They are: Shamsul Huq v. Secretary of State, ILR 57 Cal. 1286 = AIR 1930 Cal. 332; Mahadeva Ayyar v. S.I. Rly. Co., ILR 45 Mad 135 = AIR 1922 Mad. 362 (FB); Governor-General in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 07 2007

Union of India (Uoi) Thru G.M. Northern Railway Vs. Jagmohan Singh

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-07-2007

Subject : Service

Acts : Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 - Sections 2, 33, 47 and 47(2)

Reported in : [2008(116)FLR676]; 2008(3)SLJ80(Delhi)

respondent herein is an Orthopedically handicapped person having 55% disability. He was appointed as LDC in the Northern Railways on 16.6.1972. He got promotions from time to time and has risen to the rank of Office Superintendent … Para 231-A of the Indian Railway Establishment Manual Vol. I (Revised Edition 1989). Para 189-A reads as under:189A : Promotion of persons with disabilityThere shall … Sikri, J.1. The question that arises for consideration in these cases is as to whether 3% reservation under Section 33 of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 {hereinafter referred to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 12 1988

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. M. Thankaraj and Etc. Etc.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-12-1988

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 124A, 126 and 129; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 5, 22, 24 and 24A; Railways Accidents and Untoward Incidents (Compensation) Rules, 1990 - Rule 3(4); Railways Accidents and Untoward Incidents (Compensation) (Amendment) Rules, 1997; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 34

Reported in : 2000ACJ651; AIR2000Ker91

Claims Tribunal, Ernakulam Bench granting compensation for death or personal injuries of passengers under the provisions of the Railways Act, 1989 read with Rules issued thereunder. Except M.F.A. No. 915/98 all the other appeals are at the Instance of … consider the common question of law and thereafter deal with the factual contentions raised in each case separately.2. Section 124 of the Railways Act, 1989 provides for liability of Railway administration for loss occasioned by the death … had occasion to consider the question whether the provisions of the Order 33 of the C. P. C. would be applicable to the proceedings before

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial