Advanced Search Results

Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Limited Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delh ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 2(20), 2(25), 2(31), 2(32) and 184; Metro Railways (Construction of Works) Act, 1978 - Sections 2(2) and 43; Delhi Metro Railway (Operation and Maintenance) Act, 2002 - Sections 2(2), 2(P) and 104; Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 3(4); General Clauses Act, 1879 - Sections 8(1); Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act - Sections 28(A); Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944

Reported in : 150(2008)DLT367; 2008(103)DRJ369

decide the question whether the petitioner is liable to pay tax in view of Section 184 of the Railways Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the 1989 Act, for short). After remand, the Additional Assessor and Collector passed another

ishwarbhai H. Parmar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ahmedabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2005)(2)SLJ49CAT

Notwithstanding anything contained in Rule 125(1)(b), on the Central Government issuing an order under Section 71(1)(b) of the Railways Act, 1989 that goods specified in the order can be carried and charged by a route specified therein or by … applicant was transferred as Goods Guard to Godhra on 10.11.1998.Chief Goods Supervisor, Maliya Miyana vide his letter dated 31.01.1999 informed the applicant that amounts shown in the error side have been taken into debit side and the

South Central Railway Vs. Suchi Singh and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

and other items in the theft that said to have taken place. By virtue of Section 2(32) of Railways Act, 1989 each zone of the railways has to be impleaded, and that complainant cannot claim deficiency in service on … was negligence and therefore deficiency in service, see Union of India v. Manoj H. Pathak, II (1996) CPJ 31 (NC). A railway passenger has a right to have his person and property protected by railways during journey.

G. Phalaguna and ors. Vs. the General Manager and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : ConstitutionCivil

Acts : Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971; ;Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 2(31), 147, 147(1) and 147(2); ;Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : (2005)3CALLT404(HC)

v. Union of India and Ors.).6. Advocate for the respondents says that in view of provisions of the Railways Act, 1989, Section 147 [or removing the petitioners and other occupants of the area which is admittedly a railway land, there

Sr. Divisional Commercial Manager Vs. Intelligence Officer

Court : Kerala

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 3(1), 3(1A), 5, 27, 28, 29, 29(2), 29A, 29A(4), 30, 30(1), 30A, 30B, 30C, 30E, 31, 31A(2), 32, 45A, 45A(1) and 46; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 61, 62, 64, 65, 66, 67, 74, 75, 80, 93 and 97; Kerala General Sales Tax Rules, 1963 - Rules 37 and 58; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 5, Rule 27; Railways Rules

Reported in : 2006(1)KLT834; (2007)8VST434(Ker)

under the Sales Tax Act. Carriage of goods by railway is dealt with in Chapter IX of the Railways Act, 1989. Section 61 states that every railway administration shall maintain, at each station and at such other places where goods … Third petitioner was also served with a notice for payment of penalty under Section 45A read with Section 31A(2). Similar notices were sent to officials of other railway stations as well.3. Railways and its officials are deeply

Dharmvir vs.union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the train amounting to an untoward incident within the meaning of section 123(c) r/w section 124-A of the Railways Act, 1989 (in short, ‘the Act’). FAO282016 Page 2 of 10 4. The appellants have placed on record a valid … Mazumdar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. This appeal impugns an order dated 31.08.2015 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Principal Bench, Delhi, dismissing the appellant's claim for compensation, which was sought

Mrinal Kanti Bose Vs. General Manager (Claims), N.F. Railways

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 13, 18 and 23; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 2(32) and 107

Section 78 B of the Indian Railways Act, which stands repealed and replaced by Section 106 of the Railways Act, 1989. The claim application thus, contends Mr. Singh, had no valid foundation and was liable to be dismissed. Continuing … appeal preferred under Section 23 of the Railways Claims Tribunal Act, 1987, against the judgment and order; dated 31.7.1998, passed, in application No. 329/96, by learned Railway Claims Tribunal, Guwahati Bench, Guwahati, dismissing the claim application of

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Roop Narayan and 19 ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 1997(2)WLC455; 1997(1)WLN339

to be paid since the claims had fallen within the exception Clause (f) of Section 93 of the Railways Act, 1989 as it was owing to the omission or negligence on the were of the consignor that the goods … Advice message to booking station in each case which is an admission of Railway 24 in accordance with Section 31 of the Evidence Act. Reliance has been placed on the following; (i) A.K.K. Nambiar v. U.O.I. : [1970]3SCR121

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Roop Narayan and Etc.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 64 and 65; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 17 and 114

Reported in : 1999ACJ413; AIR1997Raj123

to be paid since the claims had fallen within the exception Clause (f) of Section 93 of the Railways Act 1989 as it was owing to the omission or negligence on the part of the consignor that the goods … Deficiency Advice message to booking station in each case which is an admission of Railway in accordance with section 31 of the Evidence Act. Reliance has been placed on the following: (i) A. K. K. Nambiar v. U.

Smt. Nridhaniya Devi Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 2(31) and 124

the ground that the deceased died in a bus accident and not railway accident. Various provisions of the Railways Act 1989 hereinafter referred to as (The Act) have been referred to. It appears that the Tribunal thought that if … argued that the view of the Tribunal is correct. Learned counsel has with reference to the provisions of Sections 123 and 124 argued that the accident means an accident of the nature described in Section 124 of