Advanced Search Results

Divisional Engineer, Telecommunications, Palasa, Srikakulam Vs. I. San ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1925 - Sections 2(1and 2) and 30; Railway Act, 1989 - Sections 2

Reported in : I(1999)ACC602; 1998(6)ALT171; [1999(82)FLR25]; (1999)IILLJ1316AP

workman - Sections 2 (1), 2 (2) and 30 of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1925 and Section 2 of Railways Act, 1989 - Commissioner for Workmen Compensation after recording evidence awarded compensation to respondent-driver for injuries received in course of

C.P. Sundar Raj Vs. Nethravathy and Another

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Labour and Industrial

under the provisions of the Workmen's Act in the wake of the award passed under the provisions of Railways Act, 1989 (Act No.24 of 1989) by the Railway Claims Tribunal is tenable in law? 6. As per Section 128 … interest @ 7.5% from 07.06.2007.) 1. Appellant is employer of deceased Parameshwarappa. He has filed this appeal under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 challenging the order passed by the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation awarding compensation

S.K.L. and Company, Bangalore Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 30, 31 and 70; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : ILR1999KAR1623; 1999(3)KarLJ107

ORDER1. The Central Government is in terms of Section 30 of the Railways Act, 1989 empowered from time to time to fix by general or special order rates for the carriage of passengers

Bhagaban Dey Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 30, 33, 36, 37, 43, 48, 70, 72(2), 72(3), 72(4), 73, 78, 79, 82 and 83

Reported in : AIR2010Cal13

Mr. Das, Counsel for the respondents, in view of the provisions of Sections 33 and 36 of the Railways Act, 1989, against the demands the petitioner's remedy, if any, is only before the Tribunal. He has relied on Jagit … wharfage charges will be payable are to be fixed by the Central Government according to the provisions of Section 30. This means that the validity or reasonableness of the rates fixed by the Central Government in exercise of

Sr. Divisional Commercial Manager Vs. Intelligence Officer

Court : Kerala

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 3(1), 3(1A), 5, 27, 28, 29, 29(2), 29A, 29A(4), 30, 30(1), 30A, 30B, 30C, 30E, 31, 31A(2), 32, 45A, 45A(1) and 46; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 61, 62, 64, 65, 66, 67, 74, 75, 80, 93 and 97; Kerala General Sales Tax Rules, 1963 - Rules 37 and 58; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 5, Rule 27; Railways Rules

Reported in : 2006(1)KLT834; (2007)8VST434(Ker)

under the Sales Tax Act. Carriage of goods by railway is dealt with in Chapter IX of the Railways Act, 1989. Section 61 states that every railway administration shall maintain, at each station and at such other places where goods … of the Writ Petition with the following directions.1. The provisions of Section 29(2) of the KGST Act and Section 30 of the Act read with Rule 37 of the KGST Rules and all instructions issued by the Commissioner

C. Linge Gowda Vs. Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 2(30), 124, 129 and 200; Railway Accidents (Compensation) Rules, 1990 - Rule 3(3); Railway Accidents (Compensation) Rules, 1950; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6

Reported in : II(1998)ACC469; 1998ACJ701; 1998(6)KarLJ552

Acts/Rules/Orders:Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 2(30), 124, 129 and 200;Railway Accidents (Compensation) Rules, 1990 - Rule 3(3);Railway Accidents (Compensation) Rules, 1950;General … Gazette dated 7th June, 1990 and were made operative from the date of commencement of the Act of 1989. Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, provides with reference to the effect of repeal. It provided that a

Preet Comforts and Anr. Vs. Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation an ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 6 and 30; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 124, 124A, 128, 128(1) and 128(2); Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 167

Reported in : 2008ACJ2797; 2007(5)ALD824; [2007(115)FLR1015]

very petition in W.C. No. 52 of 1999 is not maintainable in view of Section 128 of the Railways Act, 1989. Secondly, assuming that such a petition is maintainable, in view of the fact that respondents 3 and 4 … Act in W.C. No. 52 of 1999, dated 30-1-2003, they could have filed an appeal as available under Section 30 of the said Act; instead of doing that, petitioners have filed review petition, which is not maintainable and

State of MaharashtrA. Vs. Kamal Ahmed Mohammed Vakil Ansari and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - 302, 307, 326, 427, 436, 20A, 120B, 123, 124, 34; ndian Explosives Act; Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act; Indian Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 151, 152, 153, 154; Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 - Sections 10, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 40; Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 - Sections 3(1)(i), 3(2), 3(4); Passports Act, 1967 - Section 12(1)(c); Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 6, 11, 5 to 16, 26, 30, 30(b), 31

the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984, read with Sections 151, 152, 153, 154 of the Railways Act, 1989, read with Section 12(1)(c) of the Passports Act, 1967.3. The prosecution case (in Special Case No.21 of 2006) … against person(s) other than the one who had made it. The aforesaid exception has been provided for in Section 30 of the Evidence Act, which is being extracted hereunder:-“30. Consideration of proved confession affecting person making it and

Krishna Ram Vs. Union of India Through the General Manager East Centra ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

and the incident does not come under the purview of untoward incident as defined in Section 123(c)(2) of Railways Act, 1989.2. The claim application was filed by two claimants: the first claimant namely Rampatiya Devi- the widow of … Jha & Chandra S. Singh, Advocates For the respondent:- Mr. Vijoy Kumar Sinha, A.S.C.(Railway) ----------- C.A.V. ON - 30.06.2016 PRONOUNCED ON-29/08/2016 The claimant has preferred this appeal under Section 23(1) of Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 against

Indian Iron and Steel Company Ltd. Vs. Bhim Maya Chettri

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act - Sections 2(1), 3 and 30; ;Railways Act, 1989 - Section 2; ;Factories Act, 1948 - Section 2; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 96

Reported in : 2009ACJ2133,2008(2)CHN1042,[2008(119)FLR22],(2009)ILLJ476Cal

means any person who is:(i) a railway servant as defined in Clause (34) of Section 2 of the Railways Act, 1989 (24 of 1989) not permanently employed in any administrative, district or sub-divisional office of a railway and not … Bhaskar Bhattacharya, J.1. This appeal under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) is at the instance of an employer